Twitter v. Elon Musk Court Filing by Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, July 12, 2022 is part of . You can jump to any part in this filing . This is part 30 of 31. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here Feature Image: HackerNoon’s Stable Diffusion AI, prompt “breach of contract” CAUSE OF ACTION Breach of Contract — Specific Performance & Injunction 148. Twitter repeats and incorporates by reference the allegations above. 149. The merger agreement is a valid and enforceable contract. 150. Twitter has fully performed all of its obligations under the merger agreement to date, and is ready, willing, and able to continue so performing. 151. Defendants have breached the merger agreement by, among other things, violating Sections 6.1, 6.3, 6.4, 6.8, and 6.10. 152. In Section 9.9(a), each of the parties agreed that, without posting bond or other undertaking, the other parties “shall be entitled to an injunction, specific performance and other equitable relief to prevent breaches of this Agreement and to enforce specifically the terms and provisions hereof, in addition to any other remedy to which they are entitled at law or in equity.” 153. In Section 9.9(b), the parties expressly “acknowledged and agreed that the Company shall be entitled to specific performance or other equitable remedy to enforce Parent and Acquisition Sub’s obligations to cause the Equity Investor to fund the Equity Financing, or to enforce the Equity Investor’s obligation to fund the Equity Financing directly, and to consummate the Closing” if three conditions are met: (i) all of the conditions set forth in Section 7.1 and Section 7.2 have or will be satisfied at the closing; (ii) the debt financing has been funded or will be funded at the closing if the equity financing is funded; and (iii) the company has confirmed that the closing will occur. 154. All of the conditions set forth in Sections 7.1 and 7.2 have been satisfied or waived, or are expected to be satisfied or waived at the closing, and the closing will occur if the debt and equity financing are funded, which funding is solely within the control of defendants. 155. Twitter has suffered and will continue to suffer irreparable harm as a result of defendants’ breaches. Continue reading here

Funding

Twitter

Twitter's final ask to Delaware Court was simple: Musk was at fault; he now had to buy Twitter

'Twitter faces irreparable harm' due to Musk's actions, per lawsuit 

Too Long; Didn't Read

Boost your HackerNoon story @ $159.99! 🚀

Musk breached a 'valid and enforceable contract' with Twitter, per lawsuit

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

Untitled Story

20% of All General Searches in the U.S. Go Through the Default on User-Downloaded Version of Chrome

Accused of breaching Merger Contract with Musk, Twitter showed receipt that it did not

Musk Attempted to Abandon Twitter Deal via Text Threats

Musk blamed Twitter on employees attrition, while intending to do just that behind closed doors

Musk Risked Breaching Legally Binding Contract Trying to Back Out of Twitter Deal

20% of All General Searches in the U.S. Go Through the Default on User-Downloaded Version of Chrome

Accused of breaching Merger Contract with Musk, Twitter showed receipt that it did not

Musk Attempted to Abandon Twitter Deal via Text Threats

Musk blamed Twitter on employees attrition, while intending to do just that behind closed doors

Musk Risked Breaching Legally Binding Contract Trying to Back Out of Twitter Deal

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps