paint-brush
Musk breached a 'valid and enforceable contract' with Twitter, per lawsuit by@legalpdf
823 reads
823 reads

Musk breached a 'valid and enforceable contract' with Twitter, per lawsuit

by Legal PDF: Tech Court CasesNovember 26th, 2022
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story w/o Javascript

Too Long; Didn't Read

Twitter v. Elon Musk Court Filing July 12, 2022 is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. Part 30 of 31: CAUSE OF ACTION -Breach of Contract — Specific Performance

People Mentioned

Mention Thumbnail
Mention Thumbnail

Companies Mentioned

Mention Thumbnail
Mention Thumbnail
featured image - Musk breached a 'valid and enforceable contract' with Twitter, per lawsuit
Legal PDF: Tech Court Cases HackerNoon profile picture

Twitter v. Elon Musk Court Filing by Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, July 12, 2022 is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This is part 30 of 31.


Feature Image: HackerNoon’s Stable Diffusion AI, prompt “breach of contract”

CAUSE OF ACTION

Breach of Contract — Specific Performance & Injunction


148. Twitter repeats and incorporates by reference the allegations above.


149. The merger agreement is a valid and enforceable contract.


150. Twitter has fully performed all of its obligations under the merger agreement to date, and is ready, willing, and able to continue so performing.


151. Defendants have breached the merger agreement by, among other things, violating Sections 6.1, 6.3, 6.4, 6.8, and 6.10.


152. In Section 9.9(a), each of the parties agreed that, without posting bond or other undertaking, the other parties “shall be entitled to an injunction, specific performance and other equitable relief to prevent breaches of this Agreement and to enforce specifically the terms and provisions hereof, in addition to any other remedy to which they are entitled at law or in equity.”


153. In Section 9.9(b), the parties expressly “acknowledged and agreed that the Company shall be entitled to specific performance or other equitable remedy to enforce Parent and Acquisition Sub’s obligations to cause the Equity Investor to fund the Equity Financing, or to enforce the Equity Investor’s obligation to fund the Equity Financing directly, and to consummate the Closing” if three conditions are met: (i) all of the conditions set forth in Section 7.1 and Section 7.2 have or will be satisfied at the closing; (ii) the debt financing has been funded or will be funded at the closing if the equity financing is funded; and (iii) the company has confirmed that the closing will occur.


154. All of the conditions set forth in Sections 7.1 and 7.2 have been satisfied or waived, or are expected to be satisfied or waived at the closing, and the closing will occur if the debt and equity financing are funded, which funding is solely within the control of defendants.


155. Twitter has suffered and will continue to suffer irreparable harm as a result of defendants’ breaches.



Continue reading here