For years, my team and I were locked in a cycle I’ve come to call "spreadsheet hell." Every audit season, we'd find ourselves manually poring over vast, unstructured datasets, cross-referencing information, and attempting to map it all to an ever-changing list of regulatory requirements. It was reactive, error-prone, and soul-crushing. I knew a different path was possible, one that leveraged AI to transform Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) from a reactive, cost-intensive function into a proactive, strategic capability. My team wasn't interested in an expensive, off-the-shelf solution with features we didn't need. Instead, we decided to build a custom AI tool tailored to our specific challenges. Here is the step-by-step process for escaping the spreadsheets and building an intelligent compliance system from the ground up. Step 1: Auditing Our Pain Points and Legacy Systems We had to confront our biggest hurdles before writing a single line of code. My first step was a deep dive into our existing IT infrastructure, which was built on a traditional, monolithic legacy GRC platform. I worked with my team to identify the most time-consuming and error-prone tasks. Our checklist included: *   Manual extraction of control requirements from dense regulatory documents. *   Manually updating internal policies to reflect new regulations. *   Cross-referencing legal filings with our internal audit trails. *   Generating compliance reports. This assessment revealed our major bottlenecks: outdated technology, performance issues, and the inability to integrate new tools easily. It confirmed our decision: we wouldn't replace the entire legacy system, but we would build a solution to sit on top of it, creating a new, intelligent layer. Step 2: Designing the Technical Architecture and Assembling the Team My vision was to create a tool to interpret regulatory text and automatically map it to our internal controls while building a secure and tamper-proof audit trail. Here's a look at the technical architecture and the team we assembled for this project: The Tech Stack: We opted for a custom-built solution, which provided the flexibility we needed but required a significant investment. We built a custom AI model, primarily leveraging Natural Language Processing (NLP) to parse and understand unstructured regulatory documents. This was paired with a machine learning component to learn from our internal data to flag potential non-compliance risks in real time. The Tech Stack: Connecting to Legacy Systems: Our biggest challenge was integrating with our old platform without a full-scale migration. We solved this by creating a custom middleware solution and a series of APIs. This middleware acted as a translator or a "software glue" between our new AI tool and the old GRC database. It allowed our AI to securely pull data from the legacy system and push back its findings and recommendations without altering the core database's integrity. This approach allowed us to digitise our workflows without the immense cost and risk of a complete system overhaul. Connecting to Legacy Systems The Manpower: Building this wasn't a one-person job. I assembled a small, agile team: The Manpower: *   One Data Scientist: Responsible for developing and training the AI model, ensuring data accuracy and mitigating bias. One Data Scientist: *   One Data Engineer: Tasked with building the data pipelines to clean, standardise, and unify data from our disparate legacy sources. One Data Engineer *   One DevOps Engineer: Crucial for building and maintaining the infrastructure, including our custom middleware and APIs. One DevOps Engineer We had our own internal team and budgeted for external GRC consultants. Their expertise was invaluable in ensuring our new tool adhered to local and international regulations. Step 3: The Build and Cost Breakdown Building an enterprise-level custom AI solution is a significant financial undertaking. It’s not just about the software but also about the data, infrastructure, and people. Here’s a rough breakdown of what our team and I budgeted for the project, which ultimately took us about nine months to build and deploy. *   Custom AI Development: An AI solution's minimum viable product (MVP) can cost at least $50,000. Our more complex, enterprise-grade platform for GRC functions landed in a much higher range, with similar projects costing anywhere from $700,000 to over $2,000,000. The final price highly depends on the number of features, complexity, and integration requirements. Custom AI Development *   Talent and Manpower: This was our single most significant expense. Salaries for AI professionals are high, often ranging from $100,000 to $300,000 annually. We had to account for these salaries and the cost of training our existing team, which can add another $10,000 to $50,000 per department. Talent and Manpower *   Hidden Costs: We learned to budget for several hidden costs, including integration fees ($5,000-$50,000 depending on complexity), data preparation and cleansing efforts, and ongoing maintenance and retraining of the model, which can cost tens of thousands annually. Hidden Costs: Step 4: The Pilot and Phased Rollout We started small. Our pilot project focused on automating a high-impact, repetitive task: manually extracting control requirements from regulatory documents. We fed the AI a set of historical documents and cross-referenced its outputs with the results of our manual analysis. The results were astounding. What used to take our analysts hours to read and interpret was reduced to minutes. The AI could automatically identify obligation statements, provide a rationale, and tag the content for the appropriate business unit. This success was our catalyst. We then moved into a phased rollout, implementing our AI solution department by department. We recognised that technology alone wasn't the answer. My team and I invested heavily in training and change management to get buy-in from our colleagues. We had to show them that AI wasn't replacing them; it freed them from the "grunt work" so they could focus on strategic analysis and human-centric tasks. Conclusion: From Control Function to Strategic Partner This journey transformed my GRC team. We shifted our focus from reactive, manual processes to a proactive, predictive approach. By leveraging AI to automate the mundane, we could dedicate our expertise to governance's strategic, ethical, and nuanced aspects. The key takeaway for any organisation looking to do the same is this: AI is not a substitute for GRC; it's an enabler. Your success hinges on maintaining a hybrid architecture that integrates intelligent automation with human intervention, judgment, and ethical guidelines. This is how you don't just stay compliant; you build a more resilient, adaptable, and innovative organisation. Following a structured, step-by-step process, you can move GRC from a cost centre to a competitive advantage, securing your business and empowering your team for whatever the future brings.

Every

The Digital House of Cards: A Cybersecurity Professional's Case for a Decentralised Internet


Read My Stories

Too Long; Didn't Read

Make resilience your competitive advantage

My AI-Driven GRC Toolkit: A Practical Guide to Building Intelligent Compliance Workflows

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

Untitled Story

The Digital House of Cards: A Cybersecurity Professional's Case for a Decentralised Internet

How Can Decentralized Systems Combat the Network Effect? Answer to Win from 15,000 USDT

The Illusion of Accuracy in AI Models

The Digital House of Cards: A Cybersecurity Professional's Case for a Decentralised Internet

The Noonification: Subjectivity and the Evolution of AI Philosophy (11/22/2023)

The Digital House of Cards: A Cybersecurity Professional's Case for a Decentralised Internet

How Can Decentralized Systems Combat the Network Effect? Answer to Win from 15,000 USDT

The Illusion of Accuracy in AI Models

The Digital House of Cards: A Cybersecurity Professional's Case for a Decentralised Internet

The Noonification: Subjectivity and the Evolution of AI Philosophy (11/22/2023)

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps