Welcome,
I'm sure you have come across something like, you don't need Lodash
, Underscore
or Ramda
, but this is the opposite
.
When ES6
came, people got excited and started using native JS methods instead of using utility lib functions for various reasons like performance, size reduction, dependencies-free, etc.
I recommend you check out this post, Introducing Our New JavaScript Standard Library, to learn more about the JS library @opentf/std, which we will be using throughout this article.
Let us explain why again you need to reverse it when using a standard library like @opentf/std.
Let us compare some native
methods vs @opentf/std
functions.
✅ Browsers: Baseline 2023
✅ Node.js: 20.0.0
import { reverse } from "@opentf/std";
const items = [1, 2, 3];
items.toReversed(); //=> [3, 2, 1]
reverse(items); //=> [3, 2, 1]
✅ Browsers: Baseline 2023
✅ Node.js: 20.0.0
import { sort } from "@opentf/std";
const values = [1, 10, 21, 2];
values.toSorted((a, b) => b - a); //=> [ 21, 10, 2, 1 ]
sort(values, "desc"); //=> [ 21, 10, 2, 1 ]
✅ Browsers: Baseline 2023
✅ Node.js: 20.0.0
import { arrIns, arrRm, arrReplace } from "@opentf/std";
const months = ["Jan", "Mar", "Apr", "May"];
// Inserting an element at index 1
const months2 = months.toSpliced(1, 0, "Feb");
//=> ["Jan", "Feb", "Mar", "Apr", "May"]
const m2 = arrIns(months, 1, "Feb");
//=> ["Jan", "Feb", "Mar", "Apr", "May"]
// Deleting two elements starting from index 2
const months3 = months2.toSpliced(2, 2);
//=> ["Jan", "Feb", "May"]
const m3 = arrRm(m2, 2, 2);
//=> ["Jan", "Feb", "May"]
// Replacing one element at index 1 with two new elements
const months4 = months3.toSpliced(1, 1, "Feb", "Mar");
//=> ["Jan", "Feb", "Mar", "May"]
const m4 = arrReplace(m3, 1, 1, "Feb", "Mar");
//=> ["Jan", "Feb", "Mar", "May"]
✅ Browsers: Baseline 2024
✅ Node.js: 21.0.0
import { groupBy } from "@opentf/std";
const inventory = [
{ name: "asparagus", type: "vegetables", quantity: 5 },
{ name: "bananas", type: "fruit", quantity: 0 },
{ name: "goat", type: "meat", quantity: 23 },
{ name: "cherries", type: "fruit", quantity: 5 },
{ name: "fish", type: "meat", quantity: 22 },
];
Object.groupBy(inventory, ({ type }) => type);
/*
{
vegetables: [
{ name: 'asparagus', type: 'vegetables', quantity: 5 },
],
fruit: [
{ name: "bananas", type: "fruit", quantity: 0 },
{ name: "cherries", type: "fruit", quantity: 5 }
],
meat: [
{ name: "goat", type: "meat", quantity: 23 },
{ name: "fish", type: "meat", quantity: 22 }
]
}
*/
groupBy(inventory, "type");
/*
{
vegetables: [
{ name: 'asparagus', type: 'vegetables', quantity: 5 },
],
fruit: [
{ name: "bananas", type: "fruit", quantity: 0 },
{ name: "cherries", type: "fruit", quantity: 5 }
],
meat: [
{ name: "goat", type: "meat", quantity: 23 },
{ name: "fish", type: "meat", quantity: 22 }
]
}
*/
import { uniq } from "@opentf/std";
const arr = [2, 1, 2];
[...new Set(arr)]; //=> [2, 1]
uniq(arr); //=> [2, 1]
Here we need Set
intersection method for finding intersecting values in arrays.
⚠️ Browsers: Limited availability
❌ Node.js: Not available
import { intersection } from "@opentf/std";
const odds = [1, 3, 5, 7, 9];
const squares = [1, 4, 9];
const result = new Set(odds).intersection(new Set(squares));
[...result]; //=> [1, 9]
intersection([odds, squares]); //=> [1, 9]
import { aMap } from "@opentf/std";
const arr = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5];
function multiply(n, i) {
return Promise.resolve(n * i);
}
async function main(params) {
// Using Promise, runs in parallel
let result = await Promise.all(arr.map((e, i) => multiply(e, i)));
console.log(result); //=> [ 0, 2, 6, 12, 20 ]
// Using for...of, runs in sequence
result = [];
let i = 0;
for (const n of arr) {
result.push(await multiply(n, i));
i++;
}
console.log(result); //=> [ 0, 2, 6, 12, 20 ]
// Using aMap, runs in sequence
result = await aMap(arr, async (n, i) => await multiply(n, i));
console.log(result); //=> [ 0, 2, 6, 12, 20 ]
}
main();
✅ Browsers: Baseline 2022
✅ Node.js: 17.0.0
import { clone } from "@opentf/std";
const obj = {
arr: [1, 2, 3],
obj: {
a: "abc",
b: new Map([
["a", 1],
["b", 2],
]),
},
date: new Date(),
};
structuredClone(obj); // Returns a deeply clone value
clone(obj); // Returns a deeply clone value
import { has } from "@opentf/std";
const foo = Object.create(null);
foo.prop = "exists";
foo.a = { b: 1 };
foo.hasOwnProperty("prop"); // Uncaught TypeError: foo.hasOwnProperty is not a function
Object.hasOwn(foo, "prop"); //=> true
Object.hasOwn(foo, "a.b"); //=> false
has(foo, "prop"); //=> true
has(foo, "a.b"); //=> true
has(foo, "a.c"); //=> false
import { isNum } from "@opentf/std";
Number.isFinite(Infinity); // false
Number.isFinite(NaN); // false
Number.isFinite(-Infinity); // false
Number.isFinite(0); // true
Number.isFinite(2e64); // true
Number.isFinite("0"); // false
isFinite("0"); // true; coerced to number 0
isNum(Infinity); // false
isNum(NaN); // false
isNum(-Infinity); // false
isNum(0); // true
isNum(2e64); // true
isNum("0"); // false
isNum("0", true); // true; coerced to number 0
In this exploration of JavaScript native methods and their alternatives, we’ve discovered the power of the @opentf/std library.
By replacing native functions with well-tested alternatives, developers can achieve cleaner, more efficient code.
If you need to find out the performance of the lib, please check out these benchmarks.
Note: Here we don't say you should stop using regular array map
, filter
, or reduce
methods, but the external library is not bad at all and will give you some benefits from using it.
As you continue your coding journey, consider adopting these alternatives and contributing to the open-source ecosystem.
Remember that collaboration and community involvement play a crucial role in advancing our collective knowledge.
Happy coding! 🚀
🙏 Thanks for reading.