DOE vs. Github (amended complaint) Court Filing (Redacted), June 8, 2023 is part of . You can jump to any part of this filing . This is the table of links with all parts. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here : 4:22-cv-06823-JST Case Number : DOE Plaintiff : Github (amended complaint) Defendant : June 8, 2023 Filing Date : UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION Location TABLE OF CONTENTS I. OVERVIEW: A BRAVE NEW WORLD OF SOFTWARE PIRACY: II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE III. INTRADISTRICT ASSIGNMENT IV. PARTIES A. Plaintiffs B. Defendants V. AGENTS AND CO-CONSPIRATORS VI. CLASS ALLEGATIONS A. Class Definitions B. Numerosity C. Typicality D. Commonality & Predominance E. Adequacy F. Other Class Considerations VII. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS A. Introduction B. Codex Outputs Copyrighted Materials Without Following the Terms of the Applicable Licenses C. Copilot Outputs Copyrighted Materials Without Following the Terms of the Applicable Licenses D. Codex and Copilot Were Trained on Copyrighted Materials Offered Under Licenses E. Copilot Was Launched Despite Its Propensity for Producing Unlawful Outputs F. Copilot Reproduces the Code of the Named Plaintiffs Without Attribution Example: Copilot Outputs the Code of Doe 2 Essentially Verbatim Example: Copilot Outputs the Code of Doe 1 in Modified Format Example: Copilot Outputs the Code of Doe 5 In Modified Format Example: Copilot Outputs Code of Doe 5 Essentially Verbatim G. Codex and Copilot Were Designed to Withhold Attribution, Copyright Notices, and License Terms from Their Users H. Open-Source Licenses Began to Appear in the Early 1990s I. Microsoft Has a History of Flouting Open-Source License Requirements J. GitHub Was Designed to Cater to Open-Source Projects K. OpenAI Is Intertwined with Microsoft and GitHub L. Conclusion of Factual Allegations VIII. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF Count 1 Count 2 Count 3 Count 4 Count 5 Count 6 Count 7 Count 8 IX. DEMAND FOR JUDGMENT X. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case 4:22-cv-06823-JST retrieved on [insert date], from is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. Storage Courtlistener

DOE vs. Github: A Brave New World of Software Piracy

Sun's Java Implementation and the Quest for Cross-platform Applications

Too Long; Didn't Read

Boost your HackerNoon story @ $159.99! 🚀

DOE vs. Github: Amended Complaints on Copyright Infringement, Open Source Licenses & More

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

Untitled Story

Judge Rules Anthropic’s Use of Books for AI Training Was Legal, but Pirated Copies Raise Liability

A Majority of Aussies Not Motivated to Pursue Content Further After Facing Blocked Pirate Sites

A Third Example of GitHub Copilot (Allegedly) Reproducing the Code of Others

Adult Site Furious Over Popping Delisting Cherry

AI-Generated Code and Copyright Infringement: Codex’s Attribution Problem

Judge Rules Anthropic’s Use of Books for AI Training Was Legal, but Pirated Copies Raise Liability

A Majority of Aussies Not Motivated to Pursue Content Further After Facing Blocked Pirate Sites

A Third Example of GitHub Copilot (Allegedly) Reproducing the Code of Others

Adult Site Furious Over Popping Delisting Cherry

AI-Generated Code and Copyright Infringement: Codex’s Attribution Problem

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps