DOE vs. Github (amended complaint) Court Filing (Redacted), June 8, 2023 is part of . You can jump to any part in this filing . This is part 4 of 38. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here IV. PARTIES A. Plaintiffs 19. Plaintiff J. Doe 1, , is a resident of the State of New Hampshire. Plaintiff Doe 1 published Licensed Materials they owned a copyright interest in to at least one GitHub repository under one of the Suggested Licenses. Specifically, Doe 1 has published Licensed Materials they claim a copyright interest in under the following Suggested Licenses: MIT License and GNU General Public License version 3.0. Plaintiff was, and continues to be, injured during the Class Period as a result of Defendants’ unlawful conduct alleged herein. 20. Plaintiff J. Doe 2, , is a resident of the State of Illinois. Plaintiff Doe 2 published Licensed Materials they owned a copyright interest in to at least one GitHub repository under one of the Suggested Licenses. Specifically, Doe 2 has published Licensed Materials they claim a copyright interest in under the following Suggested Licenses: MIT License; GNU General Public License version 3.0; GNU Affero General Public License version 3.0; The 3- Clause BSD License; and Apache License 2.0. Plaintiff was, and continues to be, injured during the Class Period as a result of Defendants’ unlawful conduct alleged herein. 21. Plaintiff J. Doe 3, , is a resident of the State of Idaho. Plaintiff Doe 3 published Licensed Materials they owned a copyright interest in to at least one GitHub repository under one of the Suggested Licenses. Specifically, Doe 3 has published Licensed Materials they claim a copyright interest in under the following Suggested Licenses: MIT License; GNU General Public License version 3.0; and GNU Affero General Public License version 3.0. Plaintiff was, and continues to be, injured during the Class Period as a result of Defendants’ unlawful conduct alleged herein. 22. Plaintiff J. Doe 4, , is a resident of the State of South Carolina. Plaintiff Doe 4 published Licensed Materials they owned a copyright interest in to at least one GitHub repository under one of the Suggested Licenses. Specifically, Doe 4 has published Licensed Materials they claim a copyright interest in under the following Suggested Licenses: GNU General Public License v2.0 and GNU General Public License v3.0. Plaintiff was, and continues to be, injured during the Class Period as a result of Defendants’ unlawful conduct alleged herein. 23. Plaintiff J. Doe 5, , is a resident of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Plaintiff Doe 5 published Licensed Materials they owned a copyright interest in to at least one GitHub repository under one of the Suggested Licenses. Specifically, Doe 5 has published Licensed Materials they claim a copyright interest in under the following Suggested Licenses: MIT License; Apache License 2.0; and GNU General Public License v3.0. Continue Reading Here . About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case 4:22-cv-06823-JST retrieved on August 26, 2023, from is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. Storage Courtlistener

Unified Representation for Class Allegations in DOE vs. Github

DOE vs. Github: Intradistrict Assignment 

Too Long; Didn't Read

Make resilience your competitive advantage

Plaintiffs in the Case of DOE vs. Github

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

Untitled Story

20% of All General Searches in the U.S. Go Through the Default on User-Downloaded Version of Chrome

A History of OpenAI's Relationship With Microsoft

A Third Example of GitHub Copilot (Allegedly) Reproducing the Code of Others

AI-Generated Code and Copyright Infringement: Codex’s Attribution Problem

Allegations of Copyright Infringement by GitHub Copilot

20% of All General Searches in the U.S. Go Through the Default on User-Downloaded Version of Chrome

A History of OpenAI's Relationship With Microsoft

A Third Example of GitHub Copilot (Allegedly) Reproducing the Code of Others

AI-Generated Code and Copyright Infringement: Codex’s Attribution Problem

Allegations of Copyright Infringement by GitHub Copilot

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps