Unified Representation for Class Allegations in DOE vs. Github
by Legal PDF: Tech Court CasesAugust 31st, 2023
Too Long; Didn't Read
Plaintiffs, experiencing parallel harms to the Class, are set to provide effective representation. Supported by accomplished Class Counsel, versed in diverse legal realms, they're poised to champion this class action spanning intellectual property, competition, contracts, and privacy issues across the nation.
DOE vs. Github (amended complaint) Court Filing (Redacted), June 8, 2023 is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This is part 11 of 38.
VI. CLASS ALLEGATIONS
E. Adequacy
43. Plaintiffs will fairly and adequately represent the interests of the Class because they have experienced the same harms as the Class and have no conflicts with any other members of the Class. Furthermore, Plaintiffs have retained sophisticated and competent counsel (“Class Counsel”) who are experienced in prosecuting Federal and state class actions throughout the United States and other complex litigation and have extensive experience advising clients and litigating intellectual property, competition, contract, and privacy matters.
Continue Reading Here.
About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.
This court case 4:22-cv-06823-JST retrieved on August 26, 2023, from Storage Courtlistener is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction.
L O A D I N G
. . . comments & more!
. . . comments & more!
