paint-brush
DOE vs. Github: Intradistrict Assignment by@legalpdf
117 reads

DOE vs. Github: Intradistrict Assignment

by Legal PDF: Tech Court CasesAugust 31st, 2023
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story w/o Javascript
tldt arrow

Too Long; Didn't Read

The filing underscores the relationship between the development of Copilot, interstate trade dynamics, and the central involvement of Defendants GitHub and OpenAI entities. This public domain court document, available through Courtlistener, offers valuable insights into the tech industry's legal landscape.
featured image - DOE vs. Github: Intradistrict Assignment
Legal PDF: Tech Court Cases HackerNoon profile picture

DOE vs. Github (amended complaint) Court Filing (Redacted), June 8, 2023 is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This is part 3 of 38.

III. INTRADISTRICT ASSIGNMENT

18. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3.2 (c) and (e), assignment of this case to the San Francisco Division of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California is proper because a substantial amount of the development of the Copilot product as well as of the interstate trade and commerce involved and affected by Defendants’ conduct giving rise to the claims herein occurred in this Division. Furthermore, Defendants GitHub and all the OpenAI entities are headquartered within this Division.



Continue Reading Here.


About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.


This court case 4:22-cv-06823-JST retrieved on August 26, 2023, from Storage Courtlistener is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction.