DOE vs. Github (amended complaint) Court Filing (Redacted), June 8, 2023 is part of . You can jump to any part in this filing . This is part 2 of 38. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 16. Plaintiffs bring this action on their own behalf as well as representatives of a Class of similarly situated individuals and entities. They seek to recover injunctive relief and damages as a result and consequence of Defendants’ unlawful conduct. 17. Jurisdiction and venue are proper in this judicial district under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pursuant to Defendants’ violation of Section 1202(b) of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. §§ 1201–1205; and because a substantial part of the events giving rise to Plaintiffs’ claims occurred in this District, a substantial portion of the affected interstate trade and commerce was carried out in this District, and three or more of the Defendants reside in this District and/or are licensed to do business in this District. Each Defendant has transacted business, maintained substantial contacts, and/or committed overt acts in furtherance of the illegal scheme and conspiracy throughout the United States, including in this District. Defendants’ conduct has had the intended and foreseeable effect of causing injury to persons residing in, located in, or doing business throughout the United States, including in this District. Continue Reading Here . About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case 4:22-cv-06823-JST retrieved on August 26, 2023, from is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. Storage Courtlistener

Jurisdictional Landscape in the Case of DOE vs. Github

Too Long; Didn't Read

@legalpdf

RELATED STORIES