Next.js is a popular tool for front-end web development that offers many benefits compared to other frameworks. It is fast, reliable, and easy to use, making it a great choice for developers who want to create web applications quickly and efficiently.
However, there are some drawbacks to using Next.js that should be considered before deciding if it is the right tool for your project.
React is a Javascript library for building user interfaces, while Next.js is a production framework for React that expands its capabilities and streamlines the development process.
React has a dedicated framework called Create React App (CRA), an application used to set up React projects that include tools like eslint.
Next.js is a React-based framework that builds server-side rendered apps. React is still the app's foundation, but the structure and navigational mechanisms - the architecture - are defined by Next.js.
Next.js moves the rendering aspect to the server, so the client doesn't have to process that information. This improves performance and SEO because the server pre-renders the pages and then sends the final HTML to the client, resulting in minimal JS, which means less code to load. Users can expect a faster website, but crawlers can also see your website more quickly and index it accordingly.
Pre-rendering has two approaches: Static Generation and Server-side rendering (SSR). Static Generation is and will always be the best performance-wise. Pre-rendering means the page is generated at build time and re-used for every request. In practice, static pages are usually served over a content delivery network (CDN), making it super fast.
SSR is preferable under certain circumstances, such as presenting frequently updated dynamic data: the page will be generated over each request and then sent to the client.
While SSR is still better than client-render apps, it has a lower performance than Static Generation, so it's important to know when to use SSR over Static Generation because otherwise, you won't be able to obtain the benefits of NextJS.
Next.js also allows hassle-free complex structures using a folder system, making the process more intuitive and simple. On the other hand, CRA builds single-page applications right out of the box, as long you are not concerned about routing. The main difference between CRA and NextJS is that NextJS will run on the server while CRA will run on the client's browser, which imposes significant changes to your code.
React has a lot of advantages that make it a great choice for front-end development. Here are some of the most notable:
Next.js is a JavaScript web application framework based on React.js. It is a lightweight framework that provides a way to quickly build server-rendered React applications. Next.js is also known for its ease of use and its ability to scale.
There are some key disadvantages of using Next.js that are worth noting:
If you're looking for a tool that will help you build applications that are fast, highly customizable, and easy to edit, with improved SEO capabilities, then you should consider Next.js. This tool is especially beneficial for development teams that already work with React and are open to applying a new tool to their workflow.
Next.js is a great tool for front-end web development that offers many benefits compared to other frameworks. It is fast, reliable, and easy to use, making it a great choice for developers who want to create web applications quickly and efficiently. However, there are some drawbacks to using Next.js that should be considered before deciding if it is the right tool for your project.
Also published here.