A wave of local bans and restrictions is sweeping across the United States, targeting Bitcoin ATMs amid a surge in fraud, particularly against elderly victims. The narrative is compelling, but a closer look reveals a more complex and frustrating picture about how we assign blame in the age of digital crime. A wave of local bans and restrictions is sweeping across the United States, targeting Bitcoin ATMs amid a surge in fraud, particularly against elderly victims. The narrative is compelling, but a closer look reveals a more complex and frustrating picture about how we assign blame in the age of digital crime. bans and restrictions The gleaming promise of the crypto ATM, once a bold symbol of a new financial era standing on street corners and in mall lobbies, is rapidly dimming. These kiosks, designed as bridges between the traditional world of cash and the digital frontier of blockchain, are now being dismantled, not by market forces but by municipal lawmakers. The reason? A wave of fraud has crashed onto their shores, and the response has been a swift and decisive crackdown that raises a troubling question: are we solving the problem, or just removing the most visible sign of it? It began with local stories of heartbreaking losses. In the small town of Stillwater, Minnesota, a place of just 20,000 people, police reported over 31 separate fraud cases since 2023 where crypto ATMs were the endpoint. The victims were often elderly; one lost over $5,000, another a devastating $29,000 to voice on the phone—confident, official-sounding voices claiming to be from the government or tech support. The local police, overwhelmed by the technical complexity of tracing blockchain transactions and stretched thin for resources, didn’t pursue complex crypto investigations. Their solution was simpler: remove the endpoint. The city council voted to ban the machines outright. This story didn’t stay in Stillwater. It became a blueprint. In Spokane, a city council member declared the ATMs “a favorite tool of scammers” as they moved to ban them in response to a similar spike in fraud. The most telling case emerged near Detroit, in Grosse Pointe Farms. Here, the town council passed preemptive restrictions capping ATM transactions, not because of any local incidents, but because of the fear of what could happen. The stunning part? The town doesn’t even have a crypto ATM. The machine had been convicted of a crime it hadn't even committed in the jurisdiction. could The narrative seems airtight. A tool is used for crime; you ban the tool. The logic is visceral and easy to grasp. But it starts to fray at the edges when you follow it to its conclusion. If we ban crypto ATMs because scammers used phones to trick people into using them, why not ban phones? The telephone is the indispensable instrument for these cons, yet no one would suggest that. And if the scale of the theft is the justification, then the focus on crypto ATMs becomes almost absurd. Last year, fraudsters stole $24.3 billion globally through traditional payment card fraud alone—$9.37 billion of that in the US. That’s billions, silently siphoned from bank accounts without a single phone call. Yet, we don’t see a movement to ban debit cards or shutter banks. Their systems are given a pass, their fraud written off as a manageable cost of business. This reveals the true nature of the crackdown. It’s not really about the money lost, but about the target. The established, trillion-dollar legacy financial system gets to fail upward, its security flaws patched over with insurance and customer service protocols. Crypto, the disruptive outsider, is held to a standard of perfection. Its machines are branded as inherent dangers the moment they are used for crime, while the tools of traditional finance enjoy a protected status. The problem was never the inert kiosk with a QR code reader. The problem is, and always has been, the sophisticated scammers exploiting human vulnerability and a massive gap in public understanding. Banning the ATM is like putting a bandage on a symptom while the disease—a lack of education and inadequate law enforcement training for the digital age—rages on. The machines are just the newest casualty in a war we're failing to fight intelligently. Crypto

Bitcoin

Is the Ban of Crypto ATMs Really About Protecting People—Or Protecting Banks?

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

Untitled Story

Bitcoin and Gold Are Duking It Out to Determine Which is The Ultimate Safe Haven in 2025

What Wall Street Won’t Admit: They Need Decentralized AI Infrastructure More Than Crypto Needs Them

I Tried Perplexity For a Week, And I Don't Think AI Search Engines Can Replace Google.. Yet

Skyrexio Launches BitMart Integration: Free All‑in‑One Crypto Trading Automation + 600 USDT Welcome

How To Secure Your Bank Account from Hackers

Bitcoin and Gold Are Duking It Out to Determine Which is The Ultimate Safe Haven in 2025

What Wall Street Won’t Admit: They Need Decentralized AI Infrastructure More Than Crypto Needs Them

I Tried Perplexity For a Week, And I Don't Think AI Search Engines Can Replace Google.. Yet

Skyrexio Launches BitMart Integration: Free All‑in‑One Crypto Trading Automation + 600 USDT Welcome

How To Secure Your Bank Account from Hackers

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps