Despite some iniial assumptions from beginners, let’s remember that most crypto networks aren’t really private by default. Bitcoin, Ethereum, Polygon, Obyte —you can see a very transparent transaction history with full details online. Some people, as expected, need to protect their financial privacy, so they use crypto mixers or tumblers for that matter, when they’re available. Crypto mixers are tools designed to make cryptocurrency transactions more private, especially for those coins that aren’t by default (privacy coins are a different thing). They take coins from different people, mix them all together, and then send out new coins, hiding where the money originally came from. If a crypto mixer was a physical object, we could imagine something like a giant blender in which people would throw their coins to be mixed and shuffled with those of others. This way, identifying the origin of any individual coin would be nearly impossible. Crypto mixers are tools designed to make cryptocurrency transactions more private, especially for those coins that aren’t by default privacy coins Several companies dedicated to tracing crypto transactions could still do it with dedicated tools, in some cases. However, crypto mixers are a good way to obscure transactions. Enough for it to be legally concerning. in some cases in some cases Legal Challenges Crypto mixers exist in a legal gray area, as most jurisdictions don’t explicitly ban them. Yet, regulatory bodies like the U.S. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) impose strict rules on custodial mixing services, requiring registration, anti-money laundering (AML) compliance, and know-your-customer (KYC) procedures. Since privacy is a primary reason for using mixers, these requirements often conflict with their purpose, making compliance rare. Additionally, sanctions against mixers—such as those imposed on Tornado Cash and Blender.io—further complicate their legality, as even decentralized, non-custodial tools can face restrictions if linked to illicit activities. Since privacy is a primary reason for using mixers, these requirements often conflict with their purpose, making compliance rare. Tornado Cash Tornado Cash Blender.io Blender.io Authorities have targeted crypto mixers through server seizures, criminal charges, and sanctions. For example, Bitcoin Fog’s operator was convicted of money laundering, while Tornado Cash faced OFAC sanctions for allegedly laundering funds stolen by North Korean hackers. These cases highlight the risks for mixer operators, even if their tools are decentralized. The arrest of Tornado Cash developers and the legal battles surrounding Bitcoin Fog demonstrate how regulators are aggressively pursuing mixer-related activities, raising concerns about the precedent it sets for open-source privacy tools. was convicted was convicted While mixers like Tornado Cash can enhance financial privacy—useful for avoiding surveillance or protecting sensitive transactions—their association with illicit activities increases risks. U.S. sanctions make it illegal for their citizens to interact with certain mixers, and exchanges may freeze funds linked to them. At the very least, US sanctions against Tornado Cash were declared void in November 2024. While mixers like Tornado Cash can enhance financial privacy—useful for avoiding surveillance or protecting sensitive transactions—their association with illicit activities increases risks. were declared Still, decentralized alternatives, such as accessing Tornado Cash via IPFS or using non-censored RPC providers, allowed users to bypass restrictions since the beginning. Despite these workarounds, users may still face censorship inside the crypto network itself. Also, they must weigh the legal and financial risks, as authorities increasingly employ blockchain forensics to trace mixed transactions, potentially exposing individuals to scrutiny. face censorship face censorship Some Solutions for Privacy Crypto mixers aim to improve transaction privacy by breaking the link between senders and receivers, but on many chains, they face serious risks. Systems like Ethereum depend on middlemen — builders, relayers, and “validators” — who can block or ignore transactions tied to mixers if they feel legal pressure. They can also refuse to build on top of blocks that include such transactions. This means that even if a mixer works properly, its transactions could be censored before they are ever confirmed. Systems like Ethereum depend on middlemen — builders, relayers, and “validators” — who can block or ignore transactions tied to mixers if they feel legal pressure. A different approach comes from Obyte, a crypto network that doesn’t rely on block production. Built on a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG), Obyte lets users attach their own transactions without needing approval from miners or “validators”. Since no intermediaries are deciding which transactions are valid, privacy services could operate without fear of censorship. The network is truly decentralized. Obyte Obyte DAG DAG To strengthen privacy even further, Obyte includes Blackbytes, a digital asset designed for private peer-to-peer payments. Blackbytes never exposes recipient or amount details on the public ledger, so there’s no public data to analyze. Instead, the sensitive information is sent directly between users. Without needing centralized exchanges or third-party servers, Blackbytes creates a safer way to keep transactions hidden, offering users more control over their financial privacy. Blackbytes Blackbytes Featured Vector Image by storyset / Freepik Featured Vector Image by storyset / Freepik Freepik Freepik
