Find out who will play and who is out in today’s injury report for the Los Angeles Lakers vs. Los Angeles Clippers game on November 1.

Lakers vs. Clippers Injury Report Today - November 1

Analyzing Wednesday’s Los Angeles Clippers at Los Angeles Lakers odds and lines, with NBA expert picks, predictions and best bets.

Los Angeles Clippers at Los Angeles Lakers odds, picks and predictions

Norman Powell and Bones Hyland's fantasy values were enhanced in the immediate aftermath of the James Harden trade, and they made the most of their opportunities on Tuesday.

Basketball Pickups: Powell, Hyland shine for shorthanded Clippers

E_Walker. LOB_Texas 51, Arizona 49. 2B_Jankowski, Jung, Carter 2, Seager, Lowe, Pham 3, Rivera, Walker 2, Marte 2, Thomas. 3B_Semien, Carroll. HR_García, Semien ...

Texas leads series 3-1

E_Walker (1). DP_Texas 1, Arizona 1. LOB_Texas 3, Arizona 6. 2B_Jung (1), Jankowski (1), Seager (1), Marte (2), Walker (2). 3B_Semien (1). HR_Seager (3), Semien (1 ...

Texas 11, Arizona 7

While Eastern Conference powerhouses Boston and Milwaukee made bold pickups in the summer, the 76ers instead learned that Harden desired a trade to the Clippers.

76ers trade disgruntled guard James Harden to Clippers, AP source says

Former NBA All-Star Kenyon Martin reacts to his son, KJ, being traded to the Philadelphia 76ers in the James Harden deal.

Former star Kenyon Martin reacts to son, KJ, being traded to Sixers

What if that Houston team, which went out in the bubble starting Harden and Westbrook next to Eric Gordon, Covington and Tucker, could have swapped two of its supporting characters for Kawhi Leonard and Paul George?

James Harden trade: Clippers give star guard everything he could ever ask for ... and one year to make it work

The trade we’ve been talking about since July but had dragged on so long that it became the boy who cried wolf of transactions has finally happened: James Harden is going to be a Los Angeles Clipper. On the surface everyone can save face with this trade ...

Winners, losers from blockbuster James Harden trade to Clippers

James Harden is finally going to the Clippers, ending a saga that began when Harden opted into the final year of his 76ers contract in late June. The deal was first reported by ESPN.

With James Harden trade, Clippers go for it and 76ers move on

Get the most recent info and news about Lob on HackerNoon, where 10k+ technologists publish stories for 4M+ monthly readers.

Lob is the only direct mail automation platform that enables businesses to transform campaign ROI and employee productivity.  The Lob platform simplifies workflows by automating the entire direct mail process - from creation, printing, postage, delivery, and sustainability with end-to-end analytics and campaign attribution. Over 10,000 businesses rely on Lob to send more than 700 million pieces of mail through the platform.

Founded in 2013 and based in San Francisco, Lob is venture-backed by Y Combinator, Polaris Partners, Floodgate, and First Round Capital.

Find out more about Lob on our website: https://lob.com.

Curious what it's like to work at Lob? Learn more about life as a Lobster on Glassdoor: https://bit.ly/3xN3HQK

Our company was started because two college kids had a problem: Our founder has said he’s in the business of giving developers superpowers because APIs can help you solve business problems faster, to both accelerate your career, but also to save time. The faster you automate your job, the more time you can spend doing what you love (like playing NBA Jam, which was pretty important to him at the time ;). they needed to send out physical mail, but they weren’t design or marketing experts, they were developers. Was there a way to do this programmatically? The solution: APIs. That was over 10 years ago, and while we’ve grown a lot, and our product offering has expanded, we still consider ourselves an API-first company offering direct mail automation, designed for developers. We are bringing physical mail into the digital age Direct mail continues to be an integral part of any outreach whether the goal is to inform, attract, retain, or win back customers (or heck, send out holiday cards). 👩‍💻  We provide easy-to-use APIs to automate sending letters, checks, and postcards—creating a personalized mail piece is as easy as creating an email or webpage 📫  We improve address integrity with autocomplete and address verification APIs 🖨  We have a nationwide network of on-demand printers 🔍  We track every single mail piece from creation to delivery We provide APIs that integrate with your favorite programming languages, user-friendly templates, and other digital tools. If “Elixir” sounds like something only Alice would drink, we also have a simple UI to enable almost anyone – technical or not – to create postcards, letters, checks, and more (whether it’s 1 or 1 million). Our network of printers gets your mailpieces printed and in the mail, and we’ll provide visibility along the way. You’ll know exactly what’s working, and what isn’t. That’s why we say we say direct mail: it’s connected, personalized, and measurable. intelligent You mean snail mail? Yup! But our automation transforms legacy manual processes; what used to take months, can now occur in a week. Bringing sexy (direct mail) back It’s not unusual to receive a hundred emails in a single day; email is the new junk mail. But 72% of consumers read direct mail immediately or on the same day they bring it inside their residence ( ), and direct mail has 13x higher response rate than email ( ). source source The tide is shifting and you don’t have to have a full-scale marketing department or direct mail SME on staff to ride the wave. Learn more Engineers, check out & our www.lob.com/Developers API docs Marketers, learn more about automating your direct mail campaigns here Direct Mail Operators, learn more here

Meet Lob

We got a lot of eyeballs on our article last fall about autocomplete and address verify with React. Since Lob recently migrated some of our front-end projects from Angular to Vue, we wanted to present a similar We’ll be creating a Vue app that demos both a single-line address field and an address form. solution for Vue developers to clean up both domestic and international addresses with component. Lob’s Vue Address Autocomplete Let’s get started! Getting Started We’ll use to quickly set up a Vue app and install @lob/vue-address-autocomplete: Vite npm create vite@latest
# Follow the prompts given by vite
cd my-demo-app
npm install @lob/vue-address-autocomplete
npm run dev After that last command visit to see your demo app in action. http://localhost:3000/ We’ll need a Lob API key in order to use Vue Address Autocomplete. Create an account at (it’s free) then follow to obtain your API key. For our demo app I recommend using your test public key to avoid any charges to your account and prevent any malicious activity. (These keys start with test_pub_xxxxxxxx) lob.com these instructions Address verification is disabled for test API keys. When we are ready to verify an address we’ll switch to our . NOTE: live public key Adding Autocomplete Replace the contents of the App.vue file generated by vite with the following code: <script setup>
import AddressAutocomplete from '@lob/vue-address-autocomplete'
import '@lob/vue-address-autocomplete/dist/styles.css'
</script>

<template>
  <main>
    <AddressAutocomplete
      apiKey="YOUR_API_KEY_HERE"
    />
  </main>
</template> In addition to importing AddressAutocomplete , you must also import the stylesheet that it uses (line 3). This could be done in your root component file or in only the file using AddressAutocomplete. Voilà! Our app now suggests addresses as input is entered. …But what if we want to autocomplete international addresses? International Autocomplete International autocomplete and verification work the same as the U.S. version with the addition of a couple props - isInternationaland country. Here’s what that looks like (only a couple of countries being used for simplicity): <script setup>
import AddressAutocomplete from '@lob/vue-address-autocomplete'
import '@lob/vue-address-autocomplete/dist/styles.css'
</script>

<template>
  <main>
    <label for="country" style="margin-right: 1em">Country</label>
    <select name="country" id="country" v-model="countryCode" style="margin-bottom: 1em">
      <option value="MX">Mexico</option>
      <option value="CA">Canada</option>
      <option value="FR">France</option>
      <option value="CN">China</option>
    </select>
    <AddressAutocomplete
      apiKey="YOUR_API_KEY_HERE"
      isInternational=true
      :country="countryCode"
    />
  </main>
</template>

<script>
  export default {
    data() {
      return {
        countryCode: ""
      }
    }
  }
</script> Although localities may vary by country (e.g. states, provinces, districts, etc.), the address suggestion objects for international addresses use the same keys as the U.S. with the addition of country. For example, Alberta is a province in Canada however Lob will respond with state: AB in its suggested addresses. This way your code doesn’t have to change when switching between domestic and international use cases. A couple of other things worth noting about international autocomplete: International autocomplete will not work for addresses from the U.S. or U.S. territories, please default back isInternational = false when autocompleting and verifying domestic addresses. countryCode must be a 2 letter country short-name code ( ). ISO 3166 Vue Address Autocomplete will call the Lob Address Verification (AV) API when the input has three or more characters. Let’s return to our initial U.S. autocomplete code for the remainder of this guide. Address Verification Lob’s address verification (AV) API checks the validity and deliverability of a physical mailing address in the U.S. or internationally. It also standardizes addresses, corrects typos, and provides analytics about the address being verified (e.g. coordinates, building type, type of delivery route, etc.). Just like with our react address autocomplete, our Vue component library includes the same verification function. <script setup>
import AddressAutocomplete, { verify } from '@lob/vue-address-autocomplete'
import '@lob/vue-address-autocomplete/dist/styles.css'
</script>

<template>
  <main>
    <AddressAutocomplete
      :apiKey="lobApiKey"
      @onInput="handleInput"
      @onSelect="handleSelect"
    />
    <button @click="handleSubmit">Verify</button>
    <p>
      {{verificationResult}}
    </p>
  </main>
</template>

<script>
export default {
  data() {
    return {
      address: '',
      lobApiKey: 'YOUR_LOB_API_KEY',
      verificationResult: null
    }
  },
  methods: {
    handleInput(userInput) {
      this.address = userInput
    },
    handleSelect(selectedAddress) {
      this.address = selectedAddress.value
    },
    handleSubmit() {
      verify(this.lobApiKey, this.address)
        .then((result) => {
          // Simplify response into something readable to the user
          const summary = `This address is ${result.deliverability}`
          this.verificationResult = summary
        })
        .catch((errorData) => this.verificationResult = errorData.message)
    }
  }
}
</script>

<style scoped>
  button {
    margin-top: 1em;
  }
</style> We’ve added address verification to our app by doing two things 1) by tracking the most recent autocomplete selection and 2) using verify to call Lob’s AV API and displaying the results. In this example, address can be both a suggested address object or the user’s input string. verify accepts both options which is useful in the event that a user verifies his/her address without selecting one of Lob’s suggestions. International address verification uses the function verifyInternational which requires an additional parameter countryCode. This is the same 2-letter country code passed into the AddressAutocomplete component for international. Displaying an Address Form At the moment there is no AddressForm component like there is in our React Address Autocomplete however building one is easy. Let’s extend our app to include multiple fields for each address component: <script setup>
import AddressAutocomplete, { verify } from '@lob/vue-address-autocomplete'
import '@lob/vue-address-autocomplete/dist/styles.css'
</script>

<template>
  <main>
    <div class="field">
      <label for='primary_line'>Address</label>
      <AddressAutocomplete
        :apiKey="lobApiKey"
        primaryLineOnly=true
        @onInput="handleInput"
        @onSelect="handleSelect"
        class="address-autocomplete"
      />
    </div>
    <div class="field">
      <label for='secondary_line'>Apt, Suite</label>
      <input id='secondary_line' v-model="address.secondary_line" />
    </div>
    <div class="field">
      <label for='city'>City</label>
      <input id='city' v-model="address.city" />
    </div>
    <div class="field">
      <label for='state'>State</label>
      <input id='state' v-model="address.state" />
    </div>
    <div class="field">
      <label for='zip_code'>Zip</label>
      <input id='zip_code' v-model="address.zip_code" />
    </div>

    <button @click="handleSubmit">Verify</button>
    <p>
      {{verificationResult}}
    </p>
  </main>
</template>

<script>
export default {
  data() {
    return {
      address: {
        primary_line: '',
        secondary_line: '',
        city: '',
        state: '',
        zip_code: '',
      },
      lobApiKey: 'YOUR_API_KEY_HERE',
      verificationResult: null
    }
  },
  methods: {
    handleInput(userInput) {
      this.address.primary_line = userInput
    },
    handleSelect(selectedAddress) {
      this.address = selectedAddress.value
    },
    handleSubmit() {
      verify(this.lobApiKey, this.address)
        .then((result) => {
          // Simplify response into something readable to the user
          const summary = `This primary_line is ${result.deliverability}`
          this.verificationResult = summary
        })
        .catch((errorData) => this.verificationResult = errorData.message)
    }
  }
}
</script>

<style scoped>
  .address-autocomplete {
    width: 100%
  }
  button {
    margin-top: 1em;
    align-self: flex-end;
  }
  .field {
    display: flex;
    flex-direction: row;
    justify-content: flex-end;
    margin: 0.5em 0em;
  }
  .field label {
    margin-right: 1em;
  }
  .field input {
    flex-grow: 1;
  }
</style> `address` becomes an object for each address component that are then bound to our new address fields. There is also a new prop passed to AddressAutocomplete called `primaryLineOnly,` when set to true the input’s value will only update to the suggested address’ primary_line instead of a complete single-line address. From there, the rest of our code operates the same. Styling AddressAutocomplete Simply override the classes used by AddressAutocomplete and/or the CSS variables it uses for a custom appearance. Here is a list of what can be customized: Style Variables
--lob-header-text-color
--lob-input-background-color
--lob-input-text-color
--lob-label-text-color
--lob-suggestion-item-active-background-color
--lob-suggestion-item-background-color
--lob-suggestion-item-text-color

Classes
lob-header
lob-label
lob-typeahead-root
lob-typeahead-input
lob-typeahead-input:focus-visible
lob-typeahead-input::placeholder
lob-typeahead-input-with-label
lob-typeahead-label
lob-typeahead-list
lob-typeahead-list-item
lob-typeahead-list-item-active Summary Address autocomplete and address verification has become a standard across many websites online. Vue fans can add this functionality to your web app easily and without giving up control of appearance or functionality. Plus Lob’s Address Verification product provides additional delivery data to enhance your app’s user experience such as coordinates, county, and delivery info. If you’d like to work with Lob’s Address Verification API directly check out the . API documentation here Additional resources @lob/vue-address-autocomplete repo Video tutorial available here Content courtesy of Lob Software Engineer Muhammad Martinez

How to add Address Autocomplete and Verification Using Lob’s Vue Component Library

Cómo agregar autocompletado de direcciones y verificación usando la biblioteca de componentes Vue de Lob

Alice in Wonderland by Lewis Carroll, is part of the HackerNoon Books Series. You can jump to any chapter in this book . The Lobster Quadrille here CHAPTER X. The Lobster Quadrille The Mock Turtle sighed deeply, and drew the back of one flapper across his eyes. He looked at Alice, and tried to speak, but for a minute or two sobs choked his voice. “Same as if he had a bone in his throat,” said the Gryphon: and it set to work shaking him and punching him in the back. At last the Mock Turtle recovered his voice, and, with tears running down his cheeks, he went on again:— “You may not have lived much under the sea—” (“I haven’t,” said Alice)—“and perhaps you were never even introduced to a lobster—” (Alice began to say “I once tasted—” but checked herself hastily, and said “No, never”) “—so you can have no idea what a delightful thing a Lobster Quadrille is!” “No, indeed,” said Alice. “What sort of a dance is it?” “Why,” said the Gryphon, “you first form into a line along the sea-shore—” “Two lines!” cried the Mock Turtle. “Seals, turtles, salmon, and so on; then, when you’ve cleared all the jelly-fish out of the way—” “ generally takes some time,” interrupted the Gryphon. That “—you advance twice—” “Each with a lobster as a partner!” cried the Gryphon. “Of course,” the Mock Turtle said: “advance twice, set to partners—” “—change lobsters, and retire in same order,” continued the Gryphon. “Then, you know,” the Mock Turtle went on, “you throw the—” “The lobsters!” shouted the Gryphon, with a bound into the air. “—as far out to sea as you can—” “Swim after them!” screamed the Gryphon. “Turn a somersault in the sea!” cried the Mock Turtle, capering wildly about. “Change lobsters again!” yelled the Gryphon at the top of its voice. “Back to land again, and that’s all the first figure,” said the Mock Turtle, suddenly dropping his voice; and the two creatures, who had been jumping about like mad things all this time, sat down again very sadly and quietly, and looked at Alice. “It must be a very pretty dance,” said Alice timidly. “Would you like to see a little of it?” said the Mock Turtle. “Very much indeed,” said Alice. “Come, let’s try the first figure!” said the Mock Turtle to the Gryphon. “We can do without lobsters, you know. Which shall sing?” “Oh, sing,” said the Gryphon. “I’ve forgotten the words.” you So they began solemnly dancing round and round Alice, every now and then treading on her toes when they passed too close, and waving their forepaws to mark the time, while the Mock Turtle sang this, very slowly and sadly:— “Will you walk a little faster?” said a whiting to a snail. “There’s a porpoise close behind us, and he’s treading on my tail. See how eagerly the lobsters and the turtles all advance! They are waiting on the shingle—will you come and join the dance? Will you, won’t you, will you, won’t you, will you join the dance? Will you, won’t you, will you, won’t you, won’t you join the dance? “You can really have no notion how delightful it will be When they take us up and throw us, with the lobsters, out to sea!” But the snail replied “Too far, too far!” and gave a look askance— Said he thanked the whiting kindly, but he would not join the dance. Would not, could not, would not, could not, would not join the dance. Would not, could not, would not, could not, could not join the dance. “What matters it how far we go?” his scaly friend replied. “There is another shore, you know, upon the other side. The further off from England the nearer is to France— Then turn not pale, beloved snail, but come and join the dance. Will you, won’t you, will you, won’t you, will you join the dance? Will you, won’t you, will you, won’t you, won’t you join the dance?” “Thank you, it’s a very interesting dance to watch,” said Alice, feeling very glad that it was over at last: “and I do so like that curious song about the whiting!” “Oh, as to the whiting,” said the Mock Turtle, “they—you’ve seen them, of course?” “Yes,” said Alice, “I’ve often seen them at dinn—” she checked herself hastily. “I don’t know where Dinn may be,” said the Mock Turtle, “but if you’ve seen them so often, of course you know what they’re like.” “I believe so,” Alice replied thoughtfully. “They have their tails in their mouths—and they’re all over crumbs.” “You’re wrong about the crumbs,” said the Mock Turtle: “crumbs would all wash off in the sea. But they their tails in their mouths; and the reason is—” here the Mock Turtle yawned and shut his eyes.—“Tell her about the reason and all that,” he said to the Gryphon. have “The reason is,” said the Gryphon, “that they go with the lobsters to the dance. So they got thrown out to sea. So they had to fall a long way. So they got their tails fast in their mouths. So they couldn’t get them out again. That’s all.” would “Thank you,” said Alice, “it’s very interesting. I never knew so much about a whiting before.” “I can tell you more than that, if you like,” said the Gryphon. “Do you know why it’s called a whiting?” “I never thought about it,” said Alice. “Why?” “ ,” the Gryphon replied very solemnly. It does the boots and shoes Alice was thoroughly puzzled. “Does the boots and shoes!” she repeated in a wondering tone. “Why, what are shoes done with?” said the Gryphon. “I mean, what makes them so shiny?” your Alice looked down at them, and considered a little before she gave her answer. “They’re done with blacking, I believe.” “Boots and shoes under the sea,” the Gryphon went on in a deep voice, “are done with a whiting. Now you know.” “And what are they made of?” Alice asked in a tone of great curiosity. “Soles and eels, of course,” the Gryphon replied rather impatiently: “any shrimp could have told you that.” “If I’d been the whiting,” said Alice, whose thoughts were still running on the song, “I’d have said to the porpoise, ‘Keep back, please: we don’t want with us!’” you “They were obliged to have him with them,” the Mock Turtle said: “no wise fish would go anywhere without a porpoise.” “Wouldn’t it really?” said Alice in a tone of great surprise. “Of course not,” said the Mock Turtle: “why, if a fish came to , and told me he was going a journey, I should say ‘With what porpoise?’” me “Don’t you mean ‘purpose’?” said Alice. “I mean what I say,” the Mock Turtle replied in an offended tone. And the Gryphon added “Come, let’s hear some of adventures.” your “I could tell you my adventures—beginning from this morning,” said Alice a little timidly: “but it’s no use going back to yesterday, because I was a different person then.” “Explain all that,” said the Mock Turtle. “No, no! The adventures first,” said the Gryphon in an impatient tone: “explanations take such a dreadful time.” So Alice began telling them her adventures from the time when she first saw the White Rabbit. She was a little nervous about it just at first, the two creatures got so close to her, one on each side, and opened their eyes and mouths so wide, but she gained courage as she went on. Her listeners were perfectly quiet till she got to the part about her repeating “ ,” to the Caterpillar, and the words all coming different, and then the Mock Turtle drew a long breath, and said “That’s very curious.” very You are old, Father William “It’s all about as curious as it can be,” said the Gryphon. “It all came different!” the Mock Turtle repeated thoughtfully. “I should like to hear her try and repeat something now. Tell her to begin.” He looked at the Gryphon as if he thought it had some kind of authority over Alice. “Stand up and repeat ‘’ ,’” said the Gryphon. Tis the voice of the sluggard “How the creatures order one about, and make one repeat lessons!” thought Alice; “I might as well be at school at once.” However, she got up, and began to repeat it, but her head was so full of the Lobster Quadrille, that she hardly knew what she was saying, and the words came very queer indeed:— “’Tis the voice of the Lobster; I heard him declare, “You have baked me too brown, I must sugar my hair.” As a duck with its eyelids, so he with his nose Trims his belt and his buttons, and turns out his toes.” [later editions continued as follows When the sands are all dry, he is gay as a lark, And will talk in contemptuous tones of the Shark, But, when the tide rises and sharks are around, His voice has a timid and tremulous sound.] “That’s different from what used to say when I was a child,” said the Gryphon. I “Well, I never heard it before,” said the Mock Turtle; “but it sounds uncommon nonsense.” Alice said nothing; she had sat down with her face in her hands, wondering if anything would happen in a natural way again. ever “I should like to have it explained,” said the Mock Turtle. “She can’t explain it,” said the Gryphon hastily. “Go on with the next verse.” “But about his toes?” the Mock Turtle persisted. “How he turn them out with his nose, you know?” could “It’s the first position in dancing.” Alice said; but was dreadfully puzzled by the whole thing, and longed to change the subject. “Go on with the next verse,” the Gryphon repeated impatiently: “it begins ‘ .’” I passed by his garden Alice did not dare to disobey, though she felt sure it would all come wrong, and she went on in a trembling voice:— “I passed by his garden, and marked, with one eye, How the Owl and the Panther were sharing a pie—” [later editions continued as follows The Panther took pie-crust, and gravy, and meat, While the Owl had the dish as its share of the treat. When the pie was all finished, the Owl, as a boon, Was kindly permitted to pocket the spoon: While the Panther received knife and fork with a growl, And concluded the banquet—] “What the use of repeating all that stuff,” the Mock Turtle interrupted, “if you don’t explain it as you go on? It’s by far the most confusing thing ever heard!” is I “Yes, I think you’d better leave off,” said the Gryphon: and Alice was only too glad to do so. “Shall we try another figure of the Lobster Quadrille?” the Gryphon went on. “Or would you like the Mock Turtle to sing you a song?” “Oh, a song, please, if the Mock Turtle would be so kind,” Alice replied, so eagerly that the Gryphon said, in a rather offended tone, “Hm! No accounting for tastes! Sing her ‘ ,’ will you, old fellow?” Turtle Soup The Mock Turtle sighed deeply, and began, in a voice sometimes choked with sobs, to sing this:— “Beautiful Soup, so rich and green, Waiting in a hot tureen! Who for such dainties would not stoop? Soup of the evening, beautiful Soup! Soup of the evening, beautiful Soup! Beau—ootiful Soo—oop! Beau—ootiful Soo—oop! Soo—oop of the e—e—evening, Beautiful, beautiful Soup! “Beautiful Soup! Who cares for fish, Game, or any other dish? Who would not give all else for two p ennyworth only of beautiful Soup? Pennyworth only of beautiful Soup? Beau—ootiful Soo—oop! Beau—ootiful Soo—oop! Soo—oop of the e—e—evening, Beautiful, beauti—FUL SOUP!” “Chorus again!” cried the Gryphon, and the Mock Turtle had just begun to repeat it, when a cry of “The trial’s beginning!” was heard in the distance. “Come on!” cried the Gryphon, and, taking Alice by the hand, it hurried off, without waiting for the end of the song. “What trial is it?” Alice panted as she ran; but the Gryphon only answered “Come on!” and ran the faster, while more and more faintly came, carried on the breeze that followed them, the melancholy words:— “Soo—oop of the e—e—evening, Beautiful, beautiful Soup!” About HackerNoon Book Series: We bring you the most important technical, scientific, and insightful public domain books. This book is part of the public domain. Lewis Carroll (2008). Alice in Wonderland. Urbana, Illinois: Project Gutenberg. Retrieved https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/11/pg11-images.html This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at , located at www.gutenberg.org https://www.gutenberg.org/policy/license.html.

The Lobster Quadrille

The idea of building a community has always been a romantic one in the business world. What if your revolutionary startup concept could bring together a group of like-minded and passionate people? It’s easy to see which companies have successfully drawn a crowd with their innovative ways — think of Apple’s avid devotees, or the many thousands of Peloton junkies. But the best communities don’t always form after the fact. Some of the most successful businesses today set out to build a community right from the get-go; their entire business model is based not around commodity, but community. HubSpot, for example, wouldn’t be where it is today without its community-first growth model. I recently sat down with Lloyed Lobo on my podcast. He’s the co-chair of , a community of over 100k+ founders and tech professionals. Our conversation made me realize that building a community can be just as important to success as the product itself — so that’s what we’re talking about today. Traction Commodity vs. Community: What’s the Difference? The traditional business model is a pretty straightforward one: your business sells a product or service, and then you charge customers for it. This is a commodity-based model on the idea of providing value through an object or experience. But there’s a new model on the scene, and it’s being used to incredible success by the likes of HubSpot, Harley-Davidson, Salesforce, and more. The operates on a different principle: providing value through relationships. community-based business model It’s not about selling products or services — it’s about connecting people with shared interests to create meaningful experiences that go beyond what could be achieved individually. This is the basis of any good social network, but in this case, those connections are made for economic and social purposes. Great Examples of Community-Based Businesses So how does the community-based business model actually work? I browsed around to see which companies are doing it right, and found some pretty incredible examples. H.O.G. Local Chapters One of the most obvious is . When the company booted up almost 120 years ago, it was your classic commodity-based business. But as a fanbase began to grow, a culture formed — and the brand became infamous, as we know. Even people with absolutely zero interest in motorcycles know what a Harley is these days. Harley-Davidson Harley-Davidson’s community is called ‘H.O.G. Local Chapters’, and the letters stand for . The word ‘HOG’ was being thrown around way back in the roaring ’20s when Harley owners dominated racing events. Now, though, the brand has made it an official part of its identity — and being a H.O.G. member has plenty of perks. Harley Owners Group For just $49 per year, Harley owners get access to things like exclusive magazines, roadside assistance, event access tickets, Visa points, merch, and a whole list of other benefits. Family members can even join for a slightly lower fee. Most importantly, members join their local Chapter; they can rally and ride alongside other passionate Harley owners. I’m not a motorcycle fanatic, but even as I was looking through the H.O.G. website, I could feel the energy of the community — and that’s exactly what makes it so powerful for Harley-Davidson as a business. They’re profiting off of the joy and camaraderie shared between fellow riders. And they certainly treat their members well! LEGO Ideas Toys are toys — and like it or not, they cycle through phases. No one plays with Polly Pocket anymore. LEGO has found a way to make itself immortal, though, which I have great respect for. The LEGO business strategy has always struck me as one of the very best. In a nutshell, LEGO has built a community around collection and nostalgia. You can join the and post your designs for everyone else to see — and if your designs are particularly great (meaning you get lots of votes from the community), your design might make it onto LEGO shelves. LEGO Ideas community Looking through the LEGO Ideas profiles, it was clear that most of the community grew up playing with LEGO and are relishing the opportunity to use their old skills on new tricks. Just look at these bios from some of its community members: “I love lego and have since I was a child and I got my first lego set. I have been hooked ever since. Now I share the joy of lego with my daughter and my nieces and nephews. I love to spread the joy of lego. I think it’s the most amazing toy or even just the best product in the world. It changes lives for the better.” — Vonbrikenstein “Since 2014 I have been gripped by Lego fever again. With the Ideas set “Ghostbusters Ecto-1” (21108) I found my way back to the small bricks.” — Hob72 “I’m a lifelong fan of LEGO who has been lucky enough to translate a childhood passion for design into a fulfilling career as an Architect. My LEGO passion was re-ignited when playing with my children and now includes collecting, construction in real life, and digital LEGO design (primarily in Stud.io).” — Jeffy-O “Rediscovered the joy of being creative with Lego and being completely absorbed into the building process.” — Leg0flow Heartwarming stuff, right? But I bet you’re wondering how this all gets monetized. To be blunt, most of the LEGO profits come from their toy sales. However, there’s a definite business strategy to all of this. Here’s how it works: Within the LEGO Ideas community, new competitions and challenges are run pretty much every week. The company posts exercises to help its members level up their brick skills.Members can sign up for free and post their designs. They can also support other creators by voting. For the particularly talented builders, their designs go in the running to be made into real-life LEGO sets (like this awesome typewriter you might have seen floating around the internet!) So, how does it all make money? Well, with thousands of members and avid builders… they’re going to need a of LEGO. The community keeps people buying more bricks to fuel their creative passions. It’s perfect, really. lot Traction Since Lloyed Lobo is the inspiration for today’s newsletter, it’s only right that I mention , of which he’s the co-chair. Traction If you haven’t heard of Boast.ai before, it’s an innovative software that helps companies get the most out of R&D tax credits minus the usual rigmarole. Traction is its community of over 110,000 members — tech heads, business owners, investors, and innovators. The whole community is based around this idea of innovation in entrepreneurship. With industry icons like Jeff Lawson of Twilio, Kip Bodnar of HubSpot, and Julia Hartz of Eventbrite, it’s bursting with the most inventive and hardworking minds. Conferences, podcasts, and webinars deliver high-caliber education to thousands upon thousands of members each year. One of their most recent webinars was run by Vinay Hiremath, co-founder of Loom — so they’ve got some impressive names contributing to the community. It’s a simple monetization process; I imagine there’s a fee to attend conferences and webinars, which provides funds for the company and value to the community members. The members themselves seem to absolutely love the experience: “Traction is THE community to supercharge your business by learning from thought-leaders of the fastest-growing companies in the world!” — Daniel Saks, AppDirect Salesforce and have a very similar setup in which they bring together like-minded people to share their ideas and expertise. If you look around at some of the most successful companies today, you often don’t need to dig too far to find an adjoining community. HubSpot How To Monetize Your Community It’s pretty standard for the community model to use monetization strategies like paid events, subscriptions, and product add-ons. But really, it’s up to the individual business to find out what works best for them. Here are some of the most convincing strategies I found while researching: It’s rarely a good idea to charge a membership fee; usually customers just won’t bother, since they have no proof it’ll be worth their cash. Make the membership free, but lock certain pieces of valuable content (webinars, templates, etc.) behind a paywall. Restricted access. Slashing prices for your members is often the best way to get more sales through the community. Plus, it makes people feel special — which is invaluable when it comes to customer loyalty. Discounts, coupons, and other deals. Offer opportunities for relevant businesses to advertise or showcase their products in forums and other areas of the community. Ads and product placement. This is one strategy that can help if you’re charging membership fees. On the H.O.G. website, there’s a huge list of all the extra benefits you get with a Harley-Davidson membership. It’s certainly impressive, even to an outsider looking in. Make sure your members know what they’re getting for their money. Make your perks obvious. Have you got a product that members can, and would like to, trade among themselves? You can monetize that by adding a small fee for each transaction. Create a trading space. This works particularly well if you’ve got a figurehead within your community who people look up to. Sell tickets to exclusive webinars or even one-on-one consulting sessions with that person. Leverage exclusivity. You can get pretty creative with this. Just keep in mind that the money won’t always flow straight away; community building doesn’t happen overnight. But Is It Worth The Hassle? This is a great question because, let’s face it — community building isn’t easy. Businesses that naturally gather a crowd of engaged users are fortunate, since they can set up a monetized structure around the pre-existing group. But even then, it’s hard to give your community something of value they’ll actually pay for. That being said, the benefits of a community-based business model are enormous. You’re not just relying on a product to garner and maintain popularity; you’re benefiting from the collective energy of people who actively use and advocate for your product or services. It’s a self-sustaining system that can bring an extra layer of profits to your business. Think about LEGO Ideas, for example. They’ve got billions of dollars coming in from toy sales, LegoLand tickets, online stores, and so on. But on top of that, they’ve managed to dredge up an entirely new stream of revenue just by setting up a community for nostalgic builders. Never underestimate the power of nostalgia! And, of course, there’s the added bonus of increased customer loyalty. People who are part of a thriving and engaged community will naturally be more loyal to your brand than those who just buy a product off the shelf. We’ve all seen — customers value human connection much more than they used to. The community-based model provides that connection in spades. the statistics What Will The Future Hold? I truly believe — as does Lloyed Lobo — that future businesses are going to be increasingly more community-based. It’s impossible to look away from the success of initiatives like Traction and LEGO Ideas, and it’s only a matter of time before other companies start to adopt the model. That being said, there are some caveats. It’s important to remember that communities don’t just appear out of thin air; they have to be nurtured with care and attention. You’ve got to give your customers something special — whether that’s exclusive deals or insider knowledge — that’s worth their time. Lloyed also mentioned to me that he only recommends this model to people if they have a desire to bring people together. That’s the only way it works — if you’re passionate about your product and care enough to provide value to a community of users, then this model should work for you. Are you a business-driven innovator? Could ? I’d love to hear your thoughts on the community-based business model in the comments! community be your new currency Also Published Here

Lloyed Lobo Talks About the Community-Based Business Model

Amazon spent over $20 million on federal lobbying in 2021. In a close second place came MetaFacebook. The world's largest social media platform only spent a couple $100k less than Amazon on promoting their agenda in Washington. That’s an increase of around 7% for both of them on the year before and the most either of them have spent on lobbying. The point is... "Amazon and Meta are the top 2 lobbying spenders amongst individual companies." By comparison, Google ( ) spent $10 million on lobbying, which was still a 27% increase over 2020, as did Microsoft. The rest of BigTech dwarfed Apple’s lobbying spend at a mere $6.5 million ( ). only maybe that's because Apple's spending is directed towards their most important market, China The data comes from filings submitted to Congress at a time when the huffing and puffing continues by US lawmakers.  There's lots of talking of a crackdown on BigTech's monopolization of markets and imposing its sheer scale and dominance to crowd out competition and innovation. But so far, little concrete action. The BigTech giants are currently focused on the American Innovation and Choice Online Act, known as AICO. This is legislation introduced by Senators Amy Klobuchar and Chuck Grassley. The point of AICO is that it is narrowly targeted at the very biggest in BigTech. It will only apply to tech firms that have at least 50 million US-based monthly active users or 100 million US-based business users. This specifically means Google, Apple, Amazon, Facebook and Microsoft. And the bill, if passed, would block the BigTech giants from giving preference to their own products or discriminating against rivals on their platforms. Critics of AICO says that it doesn't go far enough in protecting consumers and is more directed at curbing the way BigTech stifles competition by buying up smaller players. Punch Bowl News reported that Apple CEO Tim Cook just met with Senators to ask them to oppose the American Innovation and Choice Online Act. As have all the CEOs of the 5 BigTech firms impacted by AICO. According to various reports, the tech giants and their trade associations have " " with warnings that the bill would hurt American consumers and disadvantage US companies’ ability to compete with their Chinese counterparts. Interesting, these same warnings have been repeated by several Senators this week. blitzed Capitol Hill Amazon, Microsoft and Google's 2021 buying spree Microsoft, Amazon and Alphabet (Google) have announced more deals in 2021 than any other year in the past decade, according to data compiled by Dealogic. To many, the pace of new acquisitions being signed signals that BigTech is trying to get in front of an upcoming antitrust crackdown led by the new head of the FTC, Lina Khan. Khan has started as she means to go and be on the front foot when it comes to her agency aggressively enforcing antitrust policy. She has already of Instagram and WhatsApp contributed to its current status as a social networking monopoly. filed an amended complaint against Facebook claiming its acquisitions Meanwhile, she’s drawn criticism from both Facebook and Amazon that her prior writings and statements about Amazon’s abuses of market power and her work as a White House staffer make her unfit to fairly judge issues of consequence relating to that company. On top of all this, Microsoft’s announcement of a $68 billion deal to buy Activision Blizzard is going to add to the challenges for regulators. In anticipation, Microsoft has given itself a 2-year runway to complete the acquisition given the scrutiny that will come from both the US and EU. This follows several large deals from 2021, including of Nuance Communications and . video game maker Microsoft’s $19 billion purchase Amazon’s $8.5 billion deal for MGM Studios Last year, Google's parent company Alphabet made 22 deals at a value of $22 billion. Microsoft did 56 deals totalling $25.7 billion. And Amazon had 29 deals, spending $15.7 billion. These were 10-year record spending highs for Google and Microsoft. And for Amazon, it was their second-highest spending year, coming behind 2017 when they bought Whole Foods for $13.7 billion. The amount spent on political lobbying by just Amazon and MetaFacebook alone is more than 10% of the entire FTC budget (that’s the Government body charged with overseeing fair competition). Add in the rest of BigTech and you can see how the tech industry alone can overwhelm the organisation charged with keeping a check on market activity across the entire US economy. But there's nothing new here. The US regs that curb the excesses of BigTech and protect the public and businesses were written back in 1999. They are, by any stretch of the imagination, woefully out of date and overdue an update. However, BigTech has successfully played the lobbying game in Washington for years to delay, deflect and diffuse any attempts by US lawmakers to address some of the fundamental issues with the business models that maintain BigTech's dominant hold over their own section of the Tech Economy. The balance of power is skewed heavily in favor of the BigPockets of BigTech. Until something changes, I see little chance of any meaningful regulations coming out of the US to curtail the Tech giants, and nowhere near as far as China has gone with their crackdown. The Wiser! Newsletter is a free weekly publication that provides insight, analysis and information for the Tech Economy, covering Big Tech, Brand Strategy, Crypto, the Metaverse, AI and Social Media. and join the 110,000 people across social media that follow me for Insights and Information. Add your email address here The Wiser! Newsletter relies on donations from readers like you. If you enjoyed this article, consider donating €2 here. Further Reading from Rick Huckstep Also Published Here

BigTech Spent Big Money in 2021 on Lobbying, Buying Up Competition

Image by: Sébastien Thibault Data brokers’ millions of dollars in lobbying spending in 2020 rivaled that of some Big Tech firms By Alfred Ng and Maddy Varner The data brokers who’ve made fortunes from collecting and sharing millions of people’s personal information tend to fly under the radar. Names like LiveRamp or RELX might not be familiar to most Americans, but they’re making themselves known on Capitol Hill. Collectively, data broker spending on lobbying in 2020 rivaled the spending of individual Big Tech firms like Facebook and Google. The Markup searched lobbying disclosures in the U.S. Senate’s database and the watchdog Center for Responsive Politics’ tool for the names of companies that registered as data brokers in or . Those states are the only two that require companies to annually disclose that they collect, sell, or share people’s personal information without having a direct relationship to them. Lobbying Disclosure Act OpenSecrets Vermont California All in all, we found 25 companies whose combined spending on federal lobbying totaled $29 million in 2020. Many of the top spenders were not pure data brokers but companies that nonetheless have massive data operations. Oracle, which has spent the past decade acquiring companies that collect data, spent the most by far, with disclosure documents showing $9,570,000 spent on federal lobbying. For comparison, of the Big Tech firms with heavy lobbying presences, Facebook spent $19,680,000, Amazon $18,725,000, and Google $8,850,000 in the same period, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. Public Citizen, a consumer advocacy group, found that Big Tech spent . $108 million collectively on lobbying in 2020 Oracle has its own data collection arm but has also built its portfolio by buying up companies like , Compendium, and Crosswise. The companies, which were acquired in 2012, 2013, and 2016, respectively, take data from a variety of sources. DataRaker gets data from millions of smart meters and sensors for utilities companies, while Compendium delivers targeted ads. Crosswise allows Oracle to track people across devices, claiming to process data from billions of devices every month. DataRaker Oracle also acquired , in 2014, which connected offline purchases to online profiles. Additionally, Oracle combines datasets from more than 75 other data brokers, which it calls “the world’s largest collection of third-party data.” Datalogix Our report comes as the data broker industry is not only growing but also facing scrutiny for the first time. California recently passed a statewide privacy law that establishes an agency focused on regulating data privacy issues. Virginia and Maine have also passed regulations to protect people’s online information. California’s and Virginia’s privacy laws hit at the core of what data brokers do by requiring companies to delete data collected about people upon request and allowing people to prevent their personal information from being used for targeted advertising. Maine’s privacy law prevents internet service providers from sharing personal information with data brokers until people give “express, affirmative consent.” And the past year also saw concerns raised about how well these brokers protect their massive troves of data—Oracle, for instance, after security researchers found were left exposed on a server. suffered a data breach billions of records from its BlueKai data collection The Markup contacted all 25 companies for comment on their lobbying activities. Several companies, like Inmar Intelligence and LiveRamp denied being data brokers, though they had self-identified as such to California and/or Vermont regulators. “Inmar Intelligence does not generally consider itself a data broker though one of our entities, Inmar-OIQ, LLC, is registered as such in a couple of states,” Holly Pavlika, a corporate marketing senior vice president for Inmar Intelligence, said. The industry itself is hard to define—many companies, including tech giants, make money off of personal data, though the technical details of how they use that data vary. So The Markup relied on companies that self-reported to and as members of the industry. The list, 480 companies long, shows just how pervasive it has become for companies to traffic in personal information. Vermont California The list includes businesses that are primarily data brokers, like CoreLogic, which claims to have collected data on 99 percent of property and homeowners in the U.S. and spent $215,000 on lobbying in 2020; and Acxiom, which spent $360,000 on lobbying in 2020 for issues related to data security and privacy. Acxiom’s InfoBase boasts of datasets on more than 250 million people and collects information including location data, purchases, interests, life events, and behaviors, according to its marketing material. Our list also includes credit monitoring services like TransUnion, Equifax, and Experian, which each spent about $1.4 million lobbying in 2020 on issues related to credit score reform, like the of 2020, the Credit Access and Inclusion Act of 2019, and the of 2019. TransUnion also owns subsidiaries like Callcredit, Iovation, and Signal, which has been used for collecting and profiling users for gambling apps, . Protecting Your Credit Score Act Clarity in Credit Score Formation Act according to The New York Times Notably, our tally also does not include lobbying by trade associations that data brokers are a part of, such as the Interactive Advertising Bureau and the Digital Advertising Alliance. Of the data brokers who spent the most on lobbying, Oracle far outspent its peers Oracle, the biggest spender, used lobbyists to advocate on issues like annual defense and intelligence budgets and “competition and antitrust in the mobile telecommunications and digital advertising industries,” according to . public records The company didn’t respond to requests for comment. The second largest spender was Accenture—a technology and consulting company that boasts a marketing and analytics branch called . According to its , the company can combine datasets from sources including people’s purchase history and location to help its clients build customer profiles for advertising. Accenture Interactive marketing materials In 2020, the company spent $3,250,000 lobbying on issues like artificial intelligence, the , and COVID-19 contact tracing, according to public records. Digital Dollar When The Markup reached out to Accenture, the company pointed us to two statements CEO Julie Sweet made on data privacy legislation in 2018. The statements called for a federal privacy law that would preempt state laws. PricewaterhouseCoopers, a major accounting firm, spent $2,820,000 lobbying the federal government in 2020, third most among registered data brokers. The total amount 25 data brokers spent on federal lobbying in 2020. $29M PWC collects data from advertising networks and data analytics partners including personal information like names and addresses, which it uses to help clients personalize advertising campaigns, . according to the company’s privacy statement Spending went to monitoring privacy legislation and accounting and auditing issues. PWC didn’t respond to a request for comment. Other big spenders included Deloitte, which was awarded a $106 million contract to build a development environment for the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center this summer. The company spent $2,400,000 on federal lobbying in 2020, including on bills like the and the . Department of Defense Artificial Intelligence in Government Act Artificial Intelligence Initiative Act Deloitte is an auditing and advisory company but provides services like , which uses information including people’s hobbies, interests, and financial data to generate a health risk prediction score and help life insurance companies figure out how likely people are to buy their products. PredictRisk provided by data brokers And RELX, which spent $2,375,000 on federal lobbying in 2020, including on data privacy bills like the , the , and the ; and on bills related to data privacy and COVID-19, including the and the . Data Accountability and Trust Act Information Transparency & Personal Data Control Act Data Broker Accountability and Transparency Act Covid-19 Consumer Data Protection Act Exposure Notification Privacy Act RELX is a major data broker that owns companies like LexisNexis and ThreatMetrix, which has customers in law enforcement, insurance, and financial services. ThreatMetrix alone boasts tracking on 4.5 billion devices, from RELX in 2018. according to a statement Deloitte and RELX didn’t respond to a request for comment. In addition, many other data brokers spent lower amounts on lobbying efforts An Industry Increasingly Under Fire Some of the bills targeted by lobbyists would have regulated the data broker industry, though disclosures do not specify whether they lobbied for or against the bills. The Data Accountability and Trust Act looked to establish security standards and require postbreach audits for data brokers and also prohibit collecting information under false pretenses. The Information Transparency & Personal Data Control Act would have required data brokers to get consent to collect sensitive data and go through an annual privacy audit. The Data Broker Accountability and Transparency Act of 2020 wanted to mandate opt-outs from data brokers and for the FTC to create a national list of data brokers. While lobbying records don’t always list specific bills, filings show that RELX paid lobbyists to address all three bills. Deloitte records show that some of its lobbying efforts went toward addressing the Data Accountability and Trust Act. Both COVID-19 data privacy bills looked to provide stronger controls over data related to contact tracing. None of the bills named in this story passed Congress, except for the National Defense Authorization Act, which was enacted. Some of the companies that showed up in lobbying records faced other sorts of pressure during 2020. For instance, Apple and Google from their app stores last December following a series of reports from on how the location data broker was providing information to contractors who passed that information to the U.S. military. X-Mode spent $30,000 on lobbying in the last quarter of 2020, during the height of the public pressure. banned X-Mode’s trackers Motherboard Both and , another location data broker, which spent $160,000 on lobbying, are facing scrutiny from Congress over their location data sales. Sen. Ron Wyden, a Democrat from Oregon who signed on to , called the data broker industry “out of control,” in a statement to The Markup. X-Mode Venntel a letter calling for an investigation on Venntel “Americans are learning more every day about the secretive and shady data broker industry and they’re demanding new laws to protect our privacy,” Wyden said in the email to The Markup. “It’s no surprise data brokers are trying every avenue they can think of to ward off the common sense protections Americans desperately need.” -Sen. Ron Wyden X-Mode and Venntel didn’t respond to a request for comment. Some companies said they were lobbying to have a voice on legislation, including potential federal laws on privacy. “With increased momentum, attention and legislative activity in multiple states, we support a federal data privacy law that can rebalance the system and set standards that rebuild trust with the people providing the data—consumers,” Christine Travis, a senior communications director for LiveRamp, said in an email. “A federal approach to data privacy and security is better than a patchwork of state laws for all stakeholders.” When somebody shows up on the lobbying records, it just tells me they see a real threat to their business model. -Hayley Tsukayama, Electronic Frontier Foundation LiveRamp was the top lobbying spender among companies whose for advertising purposes. The company, which connects people’s activity across the web and from offline purchases for advertisers, spent $630,000 on lobbying in 2020 on issues such as the and Privacy Shield. primary focus is collecting data Augmenting Compatibility and Competition by Enabling Service Switching (ACCESS) Act Privacy Shield was a framework for transferring data between the European Union and the U.S. but was declared . invalid last July for failing to meet the EU’s privacy regulations Travis denied that LiveRamp is a data broker despite being listed on , insisting instead that the company is a “data connectivity platform.” California’s data broker registry Experts said scrutiny and oversight is fairly new to the data broker industry. “When somebody shows up on the lobbying records, or in meetings or in trade associations, it just tells me they’ve probably recently woken up to this issue and they see a real threat to their business model by privacy regulations,” Hayley Tsukayama, a legislative activist for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, said. Others, however, said Congress is not doing nearly enough to regulate the unwieldy industry. “What is widely understood now in Congress and among independent agencies like the FTC are the ways in which large tech companies like Facebook and Google are extracting data from consumers and using that to monopolize markets like the advertising industry,” Jane Chung, a Big Tech accountability advocate at the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, said. “What a lot of people don’t understand is how data brokers fit into that ecosystem.” Originally published as " “ with the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license The Little-Known Data Broker Industry Is Spending Big Bucks LobbyingCongress

Who are the Data Brokers Spending Big Bucks to Lobby Congress?

Some Bitcoin projects are fundamentally incompatible with democratic structures and can never be incorporated in them intact. Recently we’ve learned that a Bitcoin privacy software project has joined an alliance of lobbyists tasked with “explaining” Bitcoin to the US government. This project seeks to make Bitcoin so that nothing can be known about the participants in any Bitcoin message session (what people characterize as “transactions”). This project brings to Bitcoin, the same privacy that you get with a completely legal, First Amendment of the Constitution protected GPG encrypted message; no one can know the important details of the message. This very strange joining of opposing forces is going to shine a light on the limits of the State and expose the lobbyist’s fundamental misunderstanding of what Bitcoin is for and why it was created. If they did not fundamentally misunderstand Bitcoin, they would never have asked this project to join them in the first place. completely anonymous Any lobbying group that tries to smooth the path to the state accepting Bitcoin has a hard task in front of them. First, they have to make computer illiterates understand a class of software that even seasoned developers have either a hard time understanding or no experience of. Then they have to explain the economic arguments; how can a money with a permanently limited supply ever work? How can a money without a central issuer work at all leaving aside the incomprehensible “tech details”? For the sake of argument, lets suppose that the lobbyists have managed to spark a glimmer of broad overview understanding on these people by using analogy and a hands on demonstration of a wallet. In the case of Bitcoin, the lobbyist can calm the fears of the legislators by saying KYC/AML can make Bitcoin “safe”; exchange owners must be subjected to vetting that includes fingerprinting, huge surety bonds, mandatory insurance, embedded Compliance Officers and all the other trappings of the old world that makes them feel safe. But then, something happens. A New Challenger Arrives A new addition to the protocol enters the scene, that offers putting it beyond the reach of any government. How can a lobbyist sell this, even with the developers of the software on board? 100% anonymous Bitcoin transactions possibly This horse will never stop being a horse. Assuming the software developers are men of integrity and have no intention of adding back doors or any other crippleware features to their tool, there is nothing that the lobbyist can say to them to make them corrupt their software. When the lobbyist goes for a hearing in front of a panel of law makers, all they can do is throw their hands up and say, “We can’t change the software, but at least now you know about it”. The legislators will cry, “SOMETHING MUST BE DONE TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC!”. The lobbyist will go back to the developer, with a list of crippling features who will say something along the lines of, “No”. We can say for sure that this outcome is . The people working on privacy software are motivated by principle, not expedience. They will corrupt, cripple, weaken, back door, subvert or in any way spoil their software on the advice or pleading of a robotic lobbyist “for the good of society”, because of course, they are making anonymity enabling software . And here is the problem; absolutely inevitable never for the good of society both of these groups believe that what they are doing is for the good of society, they just don’t agree on what that means. By all means, you can create a lobbying group, spend a million dollars a year on it, write shabby and misleading reports and lobby legislators; in the end, this will not have any effect on the software that is written. If software really is “eating the world” it makes no sense to fight against it, and incorporating its developers into worthless, toothless structures can’t stem its flow either. Software is being written everywhere on Earth. It can be sent and executed anywhere without permission, and this cannot ever be stopped. The world works well precisely because software can flow where it is needed and be improved upon without permission. Any attempt to interfere with this flow will have catastrophic consequences for the jurisdiction insane enough to try it, and in the case of The Bitcoin Network, interference in it will have catastrophic economic consequences. We have a foretaste of what this will look like by examining the online Poker industry and how countries that disallow this form of gaming do not collect revenues from that activity, the captive citizens playing online through proxy servers to free countries where the taxes are collected. This will happen with Bitcoin with amounts of money measured in hundreds of billions of dollars. but on a global scale Bitcoin GitHub History Visualized You can’t stop The Bitcoin Network and the advance of anonymity by bringing the developers of the tools “on board”. Nothing you can do will stop the inevitable global embrace of Bitcoin on its own terms. The experience of other softwares shows this assessment to be correct; any attempt to stop it is completely fruitless and illogical in addition to being profoundly unethical. Software is not about personal relationships, forming cleverly named groups, attending public hearings or publishing policy statements. It is about one thing, and one thing only; the running binaries. Eat, or do not eat. It’s binary.I choose eat.Grilled monkfish, mash, house white↴

Bitcoin, Lobbying and Anonymity

It’s Holiday Card season! But my hand hurts just thinking about addressing all those envelopes, and I can’t remember the last time I bought stamps…let’s be real, ain’t nobody got time for that. Fortunately, I happen to work for a company that sends direct mail programmatically. Many developers using one of our SDKs in their preferred programming language, but we recently launched our low-code and I thought I’d give it a whirl. integrate with Lob Campaigns ‍ The following is a step-by-step tutorial so you too can create personalized full-color 6”x9” holiday postcards—to be printed and mailed by Lob. For under a dollar each (inclusive of printing and postage) send season greetings to your loved ones. We’ll use the sample shown below, but those with more HTML knowledge can customize all they wish! Select and Prep Your Photos Choose two of your favorite photos: one landscape (for the front) and one portrait (for the back). Use your photo editing tool of choice to format each correctly; I used Preview on my Mac. To ensure they print at the highest quality they should be: 5x7 inches (1500 pixels x 2100 pixels in portrait and 2100 pixels x 1500 pixels in landscape), at a resolution of 300 pixels per inch, and saved in an RGB color profile. (If you are snagging photos from your iPhone, see the Appendix for a cheat sheet.) Label each clearly FRONT and BACK. ; I used a free account at . You will then need to host your images somewhere imgbb.com Prep Your Data 1. You will then need to snag the HTML for the and of the postcard (we’ll use it in a later step). front back 2. Next, you will prep your address data. and input your data: Make a copy of this spreadsheet Do not modify or add any column headers! Add the full name in the `name` column Add the address data (make sure that leading zeroes aren’t being dropped and that the state code is used) Replace the “Lorem ipsum” in the `message` column with your own personalized message. Make sure that the message fits within the space by being shorter than the placeholder examples (about 65 characters). You can test your holiday card messaging . HERE Add the links to your front and back images to every row in the `image_front` and `image_back` columns (links should look something like this: ) https://i.ibb.co/fpJ84Js/front.png 3. Download your address file . as a .csv Create Your HTML Templates Now, you are ready to create your postcards in the Lob dashboard. 1. First, you will need to . sign up for a free Lob account 2. Once you have registered, you will be taken to the dashboard. In the Developer tier, there is no cost to test out the Print & Mail APIs, but Payment information will need to be entered : Your name (top right) -> Settings -> Payment if you want to send live requests—and have a postcard printed and mailed—it will currently run you $0.896 a postcard (inclusive of printing and postage). here 3. Create & save HTML templates for the Front and Back of your postcard: On the left menu bar, Navigate to . HTML Templates Make sure Live is highlighted! Click on ‘Create’. Name this ‘Front Template’ and paste in the HTML code for the front. Click ‘Create’ to save. On the left menu, click HTML Templates to go back to the main template screen (You should see your new Front template there under Live templates.) Once again, ensuring Live is highlighted, click ‘Create’ again. Name this ‘Back Template’ and paste in the HTML code for the back. Click 'Create' to save. Click HTML templates to go back to the main template screen; you should see your new Back template there under Live templates. ** Make sure you see both templates are listed when Live is highlighted before proceeding.** Create and Send Your Postcards On the left menu bar, navigate to ; click on “Create Campaign” Campaigns Step 1: Configure Campaign 1. Enter a Name and Description 2. Campaign Type: Marketing 3. Mail Type: Postcard; Size: 6x9 4. Postage references: Return address is not required; Select postage: Up to you, ‍ note the listed expected delivery times 5. Cancellation Window: This is set at 5 minutes; you will not have the option to edit on the free Developer plan 6. Campaign-Level Metadata: Optional Step 2: Add Audience 1. Upload your CSV file (created during prep stages), or drag and drop it into the dashboard 2. Map required address variable: These are mapped automatically Step 3: Choose Creative 1. Under ‘Postcard Front’, select the HTML Template you created from the dropdown menu (note the previews will not show your images or messages as they are not mapped yet) 2. Under ‘Postcard Back’, select the HTML Template you created from the dropdown menu (note the previews will not show your images or messages as they are not mapped yet) 3. Connect your creative to your audience: Merge variable strictness: Ignore Connect/map your merge Variable from HTML to the appropriate column in the CSV: {{img_front}} to {{img_back}} to {{message}} to img_front, img_back, message Step 4: Review Campaign Review carefully, If something is not correct, click ‘Previous Step’ to edit. once you place your order, after 5 minutes, the live request will be sent to Lob; your postcards will be created and mailed, and you will be charged. If everything looks good, click ‘Place Order’ and your holiday cards will be on their way! You can view your postcards under Campaigns or Postcards (Live) in the Lob dashboard. Wrap up Lob was started by two developers who needed to solve a problem, and were the answer; the goal was to make sending mail just as easy as sending an email. direct mail APIs This is a fun personal use case, but Just like email, each mailpiece can be highly personalized, and automated. Lob is meant to automate direct mail—postcards, letters, checks, self-mailers, and more—at scale. For advanced tiers, Mail Analytics is available for each mailpiece to track each postcard along its journey to delivery (and if you included a QR code, you could even track the open rate). Appendix: How to Prep a Photo Not every developer is a designer, nor do they have commercial printing experience, so this part can be tricky. Email/Download a photo from your iPhone on your computer. The following steps are shown in the Preview app (Mac) but are a good guideline for any editing program. Select your back photo (portrait orientation). Under , select . Tools Adjust Size Change Resolution to . 300 pixels/inch For this photo (portrait orientation): Change the Width to 5 inches, and the Height will automatically change. Alternatively, update the Height to 7, and the Width will change. ; you will crop in the next step). It’s highly likely you won’t end up with a perfect 5x7; that’s ok: Change the field that results in one of the measurements being slightly too big Under , Drag the dotted line to pixels (as you move the line, the measurements will display; exaggerated below). Edit Select All. crop the image to the necessary 1500x2100 Under , select Generic RGB. (Photos must be saved in RGB.) Tools Assign Profile Make sure your photo is named clearly as the BACK. Save! Repeat these steps for the FRONT photo but in landscape orientation (7” wide x 5” high, 2100 pixels x 1500 pixels). ‍

LOB

lob-assets.com

201-500 employees

Since 2013

COMPANY RANKING

LOB

EVERGREEN INDEX #6624

Representing this company? Click here to claim and customize this page!

Lob WIKI

Apply to get your Tech Company News Page live on HackerNoon.com today!

LOB