Incube Space enables commercial real estate owners and tenants to offer healthy, sustainable and productive spaces for occupiers

Incube Space

I recently traveled to Berlin to take part in Berlin Blockchain week. From many of the week’s events, I visited two of the largest: dAppcon and ETHBerlinZwei. On the second day of dAppcon, I decided to walk to the venue (about an hour’s walk away). I was lucky enough to stay at the iconic Kreuzberg. During the walk, I saw probably the best street art of my life. Since photos from conferences are usually pretty boring, I’ll just share what I saw on the streets of Berlin. There were around 800 participants at both the dAppcon and the hackathon. Props to the organizers for successfully herding the cats - the overall experience was quite seamless. The only real problem was the unintentioned digital detox - there was no internet connection at the Technical University where dAppcon was taking place. And I mean truly none - not wifi, not mobile data. Well, at least we in the audience had to pay sustained attention to the speakers, as they rightly deserved. Attendees had a chance to listen and talk to some of the biggest names in the industry, such as Vitalik Buterin, Vlad Zamfir, Joseph Lubin. There was a lot of talk about various DAOs and their toolboxes, ETH 2.0 and DeFi. The talks at the conference were mostly about projects that are already public (like or ) and attendees had a chance to discuss the progress with the CEOs. Incubed Centrifuge The toxic maximalist interlude One of the most entertaining discussion panels was the one with Ryan Selkis (Messari), Martin Koeppleman (Gnosis) and Udi Wertheimer (Reckless Review). Udi wore a Toxic Maximalist t-shirt, making his position quite clear: this was a debate on value and viability of cryptocurrency applications besides Bitcoin. The debate nicely illustrated the fundamental difference in mental models of the two communities (Bitcoin & Ethereum). For Udi, the only thing valuable in context of cryptocurrencies is the censorship resistant money with immutable monetary policy. For Martin, this is only the beginning and blockchains bring two main promises: 1) to make coordination among people much easier, and 2) to enjoy the benefits of monopoly without the disadvantages of monopoly. The second promise is about having a high quality scalable services without the market dominance and rent-seeking of global corporations. Although the debate was quite informative, the problem I have with such debates is that the usually talk past each other and aren’t really trying to “grok” the arguments of the other side. It would be hugely beneficial if Ethereum crowd understood the importance of sovereign money with little to none governance (which is Bitcoin) and if Bitcoin crowd understood the importance of building other permissionless services besides money itself. Bitcoin maximalist is like a paranoid prepper, while Ethereum enthusiast is like a Silicon Valley hippie. Both should pay more attention to the world around them and try to find synergies with each other. Meme driven development To illustrate the laid back nature of Ethereum, several guys from the Ethereum foundation dressed up in furry costumes and held a discussion panel on “Meme driven development”. So here is one exception and an actual photo from the conference: Apparently Ameen Soleimani from MolochDAO is a meme on his own and doesn’t need any further costume. Highlight of this panel was a Vitalik soundalike (in the fox costume) discussing the cultural importance of memes in Vitalik’s typical android voice. It’s nice to see Vitalik being made tasteful fun of, especially at the Ethereum conference. The worst thing that could happen is to build up an image of a flawless leader. We should doubt human judgement (yes, I make the assumption that Vitalik indeed is from this Earth) and if humor is what it takes to realize we all have flaws (and thus our work should always be not trusted, but verified), then let’s just fire up those memes. But jokes aside, memes were also discussed in more serious talks and panels during the conference. One line that stuck in my head is that Bitcoin’s 21 million coins and the store of value property is itself a sort of meme - just something the community agrees on. This kind of “social contract” reasoning seems misleading to me. The main difference between Bitcoin and fiat currencies are the cryptoeconomic assurances that the promise (monetary policy, max number of coins...) will be actually upheld, because there is no way to change them by the minority rule (e.g. central bank board). The killer feature of cryptocurrencies and the systems built on top of them is the immutability. All the talk about the immutable monetary policy being a meme and the calls for protocol governance - which will be inevitably subjective and politicizing - seems misguided to me. DeFinite progress Besides all the talk about DAOs and governance there was a lot of DeFi stuff going on, both at the dAppcon and at the hackathon. One thing I really appreciate about DeFi projects is the ability to actually measure the utilization - I can simply look up the onchain data and see how much capital is locked up in the smart contracts and how is the capital used. It’s quite impressive to look e.g. at 160M USD in supply and, more importantly, 46M USD in borrow - in less than a year since the money market’s launch! Decentralized Finance (DeFi) is a perfect fit for something like Ethereum, much more than security tokens or any other attempts to tokenize real world assets. DeFi serves crypto-native use cases, so there is no need to compromise on trustlessness or permissionlessness - which is impossible if you need to perform a custody of real world assets. If done right, it also serves as a great regulatory arbitrage - there is simply nothing to regulate, at least not by today’s rules. That’s because it’s users themselves who are doing all the necessary steps to enter financial contracts such as lending, borrowing or trading on margin. What previously required a trusted third party can be done in a trustless and transparent manner through smart contracts. So it’s no wonder that a lot of development teams would like to have a piece of the DeFi pie and contribute. At the dAppcon, Martin Koeppleman from Gnosis talked about their project of conditional markets, which are esentially bets contingent on related events (simple example: the multicollateral DAI goes live, will it overtake singlecollateral by a certain date?). Read more about conditional markets . Compound’s if here ETHBerlinZwei hackathon submissions My favourite projects submitted as a part of the hackathon (not necessarily winning any prize) are also mostly DeFi related: , - projects focusing on interest rate swaps and interest futures for Compound money market. DeFi gets a major facelift with such projects, as it becomes possible to construct predictable derivatives with fixed interest rates in place. RateLock, Cherry Swap LSDai - browser extension to pay with DAI for stuff, e.g. on Amazon. Cool and an obvious path to broader stablecoin adoption. PaiDai - this one nicely blends a need for better web3 UX with the power of DeFi. Yaw is a DAI wallet, where all the deposits are automatically supplied to Compound money market. The interest (in DAI) gets swapped to ETH after some time, and the resulting ETH is used for gas. All the user sees is his DAI balance and the number of “free” payments he can make. Yaw - this one isn’t a DeFi project, but I appreciate the simple yet powerful idea of representing word strings as integers, which greatly saves space and thus fees. WordDAO If you’d like to explore the conference & hackathon content more deeply, there is a recording of ETHberlin and , plus you can browse all the hackathon projects on . Day 1 Day 2 Devpost

Sweet Berlin Street Art, oh and some EthBerlinZwei reflections as well

Disproving any myth starts with statistics, so we have asked around the office and found out that the majority of our clients’ are not good at chess or don’t play at all. software engineers at NCube But what strikes us is that those who play chess turned out to be programmers by calling. These are the specialists who get things done, and more importantly, they love what they do. It is essential to understand that not all IT professionals, especially in outsourcing, are die-hard fans of coding. They do it because it pays their bills, supports their families or an expensive hobby like motorsports or going to a club. Although we didn’t see a direct connection between achievements in chess and , it’s still possible to compare and find something common between these activities. programming Can playing chess make you a better programmer? Chess helps achieve laser-like focus In today’s blip-culture, it’s easy to get distracted by a myriad of microtasks, social media and chats with coworkers. It takes 15–45 minutes for a programmer to get back into the productivity mode after a distraction. Playing chess trains the kind of focus one needs for a match game that can last for hours and see it through. Adaptation to tedious work What can be tedious about programming? Someone will say that it’s exciting to learn new frameworks and libraries. But let’s be honest — for those seeking adventure, there are plenty of other careers that are by far more thrilling. Programming is all about remembering and applying hundreds of similar tasks. At the same time, playing chess requires learning hundreds of typical variations and openings. Skills needed to achieve long-term goals On average, it takes 5 years to achieve meaningful results in programming. To become a dab hand at chess, many players start practicing at an early age. A child gets used to the fact that becoming a champion requires years of consistent practice. Professionals with this kind of a mindset are not likely to easily give up when faced with hardships. A sense of purpose helps them on their long journey to success. Programming is a great option for successful chess players who want to make a career change. All of chess skills can be put to good use in data processing, high load systems, and machine learning or any other IT field with a high barrier of entry. Rewards like a high-paying job and plenty of exciting projects await those who dare to make the switch. Mind training Like any other strategy game, chess trains the executive function of the brain — deductive and analogical reasoning, including memory and attention. In addition to these skills, programming requires logic, mathematics, abstraction and language skills, namely visualization, semantical, and syntactical analysis of textual constructions. Starting to play chess at an early age brings more tangible results from the effort. In fact, my school included chess into the curriculum as a mandatory subject in the first grade. A downside of playing chess Chess can be a waste of time. It’s better to exercise Chess takes a lot of time. The skillset of a typical senior software engineer grows with every day. It’s is a true arms race where chess can be a distraction from sharpening your coding skills. If you have a few hours to spare, it’s better to spend them in the gym. Lack of socializing and a strong community Besides work, there are plenty of activities that help build career and . You can go camping, play PC games with coworkers during a break or go cycling in the park. The chess community is too small — it’s even outnumbered by the Universe. network “Warhammer 40,000” First place is already taken In 1996, world chess champion Garry Kasparov lost the game to Deep Blue, an IBM computer capable of evaluating 200M mover a second. This means that the champion has been already predefined — men won’t be able to beat machine at chess without significant technology upgrades like brain implants. The question is whether you are willing to devote years to mastering chess only to have a chance to compete for second place? Impossible to make a living playing chess Famous chess players do make good livings, but compared to Silicon Valley or India based programmers, their number is extremely small. Programming in fact has changed the lives of millions of people. It’s a social elevator accessible to everyone. Many great chess players have changed a career because they had to provide for their families. Programmers, on the other hand, tend to remain active professionally before retirement and become advisors, analytics or managers. Final thoughts If you are a good chess player, it would be easier for you to become good at programming. This being said, chess skills should not be overestimated — if you don’t know how to play chess, waste no time learning how to and go straight to working on your coding skills. This way has proven the most reliable and effective. And the best way to start as a software developer — try to develop your own chess game.

INCUBE SPACE

incube.space

-- employees

Since n.d.

COMPANY RANKING

INCUBE SPACE

EVERGREEN INDEX #5948

Representing this company? Click here to claim and customize this page!

Incube Space WIKI

Apply to get your Tech Company News Page live on HackerNoon.com today!

INCUBE SPACE

incube.space

-- employees

Since n.d.

COMPANY RANKING

INCUBE SPACE

EVERGREEN INDEX #5948

RELATED COMPANIESRANK

STORIES ABOUT INCUBE SPACE

Representing this company? Click here to claim and customize this page!

Incube Space WIKI

Apply to get your Tech Company News Page live on HackerNoon.com today!