The crypto industry spent the last year celebrating every institutional adoption milestone like conquering heroes. BlackRock launching a Bitcoin ETF. Goldman Sachs disclosing $2 billion in crypto holdings. Jamie Dimon stops calling Bitcoin a fraud. Is the battle over? Goldman Sachs disclosing $2 billion in crypto holdings Goldman Sachs disclosing $2 billion in crypto holdings Not at all. Here's the uncomfortable truth that TradFi doesn't want to acknowledge: Wall Street needs crypto's decentralized infrastructure far more than crypto needs Wall Street's validation. And they know it. JPMorgan's COIN AI platform processes 360,000 legal hours of work annually. Goldman Sachs uses machine learning for everything from trade execution to risk management. Bank of America deploys AI across 300,000 employees. These aren't experiments—they're operational necessities. Miss the AI revolution, and you're Blockbuster in the Netflix era. JPMorgan's COIN AI platform processes 360,000 legal hours of work annually JPMorgan's COIN AI platform processes 360,000 legal hours of work annually Here's what they won’t admit: every major bank is dependent on the same three AI providers that their Big Tech competitors use. Imagine Goldman Sachs' angst when realizing their AI-powered trading strategies run on the same Google infrastructure that Alphabet's own trading desk uses. It's like both boxers training in the same gym, except that one owns the gym and controls the equipment. The numbers are staggering. Financial services will spend $130 billion on AI by 2028, according to IDC. That's $130 billion flowing directly into the coffers of companies that increasingly compete with traditional finance. Apple offers credit cards. Google provides payment services. Amazon contemplates checking accounts. Every dollar Wall Street spends on AI infrastructure strengthens their direct competitors. Financial services will spend $130 billion on AI by 2028, according to IDC Financial services will spend $130 billion on AI by 2028, according to IDC This explains the sudden institutional fascination with "DeFi infrastructure" and "tokenization platforms." It's not about 24/7 settlement or programmable money—those are nice benefits. It's about survival. Wall Street desperately needs AI infrastructure that Big Tech doesn't control, and crypto built exactly that. Consider the stablecoin legislation in the GENIUS Act. The headlines focus on regulatory clarity, but buried in the details is a poison pill for Big Tech: they can't issue stablecoins without partnering with regulated financial institutions. Translation: the payment rails for the AI agent economy must flow through traditional finance, not around it. It sure looks like Wall Street lobbyists earning their fees. The convergence is already happening. SharpLink Gaming raised $425 million for an "Ethereum treasury strategy," but read between the lines—they're building AI-powered gaming infrastructure that needs decentralized compute and settlement. Sol Strategies delivered 2,336% returns not by holding Solana, but by building infrastructure for others to access Solana's capabilities. These aren't treasury strategies; they're infrastructure plays masked as speculation. SharpLink Gaming raised $425 million for an "Ethereum treasury strategy," SharpLink Gaming raised $425 million for an "Ethereum treasury strategy," Sol Strategies delivered 2,336% returns Sol Strategies delivered 2,336% returns The real tell? Five crypto unicorns are expected to IPO in 2025. Wall Street doesn't take companies public out of charity. They do it because they need liquid access to critical infrastructure. Every crypto IPO represents traditional finance admitting they need capabilities that they can't build internally. Five crypto unicorns are expected to IPO in 2025 Five crypto unicorns are expected to IPO in 2025 The agent economy accelerates this dynamic. When AI agents start transacting autonomously—hiring other agents, purchasing compute resources, trading assets—they need neutral infrastructure. No agent will accept another agent's currency if it's controlled by a potential competitor. They need trustless, permissionless, decentralized rails. Does this sound familiar? Stablecoin assets doubling to $400 billion isn't about crypto adoption. It's about creating the monetary base for agent-to-agent transactions. When your AI lawyer needs to pay an AI accountant who needs to pay an AI analyst, they're not using ACH transfers that take three days to clear. They're using instant, programmable money that settles in seconds. Stablecoin assets doubling to $400 billion Stablecoin assets doubling to $400 billion This creates a prisoner's dilemma for Wall Street. Every bank knows they need decentralized AI infrastructure to remain competitive. But being first means admitting weakness. So they hide behind "blockchain initiatives" and "digital asset strategies" while desperately building bridges to the decentralized future they claim to merely investigate. The smart money sees through the charade. Why do you think Consensys, Pantera, and Galaxy Digital led SharpLink's funding round? They're not betting on Ethereum appreciation. They're betting on traditional finance's desperate need for infrastructure they don't control. Every bank that (inevitably) joins helps legitimize the technology and increase its value. Here's the kicker: Wall Street can't build this infrastructure themselves. They spent decades optimizing for centralized control, regulatory compliance, and risk minimization. Asking them to build decentralized, permissionless, risk-embracing infrastructure is like asking a fish to climb a tree. They need crypto natives to build it for them. This reverses the traditional dynamic. Crypto doesn't need to beg for institutional adoption. Traditional finance needs to ensure decentralized infrastructure develops fast enough to save them from Big Tech dominance. Every delay in building cross-chain AI infrastructure is another month of competitive advantage lost to Google and Microsoft. The 2025 crypto IPO wave isn't crypto's victory lap—it's Wall Street acknowledging what it needs. They need liquid markets to access infrastructure. They need traditional structures to interact with decentralized systems. Wall Street isn't a kingmaker validating crypto; they're scrambling to access capabilities that they can't create and can't survive without. The power is shifting. The only question is whether web3 will build the infrastructure fast enough to save them from the Big Tech barbarians at the gate.

The is an opinion piece based on the author’s POV and does not necessarily reflect the views of HackerNoon.

The writer is smart, but don't just like, take their word for it. #DoYourOwnResearch before making any investment decisions or decisions regarding your health or security. (Do not regard any of this content as professional investment advice, or health advice)

Gala

Ethereum

Solana

Every

Amazon

BlackRock

Too Long; Didn't Read

Make resilience your competitive advantage

What Wall Street Won’t Admit: They Need Decentralized AI Infrastructure More Than Crypto Needs Them

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

Untitled Story

What You Need to Know About Machine Learning (and How to Begin)

Why Most Token Launches Fail and How Blubird Is Fixing It

Lemonade is Sweetening Web3 in a Unique Way

The Noonification: Use This 7-Step McKinsey Framework to Solve Any Problem (1/10/2023)

The Noonification: A Taxonomy of Inclusiveness (1/11/2024)

What You Need to Know About Machine Learning (and How to Begin)

Why Most Token Launches Fail and How Blubird Is Fixing It

Lemonade is Sweetening Web3 in a Unique Way

The Noonification: Use This 7-Step McKinsey Framework to Solve Any Problem (1/10/2023)

The Noonification: A Taxonomy of Inclusiveness (1/11/2024)

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps