paint-brush
Washington Takes Aim at Meta for Violating Consumer Protection Lawsby@legalpdf

Washington Takes Aim at Meta for Violating Consumer Protection Laws

by Legal PDF: Tech Court CasesFebruary 8th, 2024
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story w/o Javascript
tldt arrow

Too Long; Didn't Read

Washington alleges Meta engaged in deceptive acts under the state's Consumer Protection Act, impacting consumers, especially young users. Allegations range from false safety assurances to deceptive user data practices, prompting legal action.

People Mentioned

Mention Thumbnail
featured image - Washington Takes Aim at Meta for Violating Consumer Protection Laws
Legal PDF: Tech Court Cases HackerNoon profile picture

The United States v Meta Platforms Court Filing October 24, 2023 is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This is part 97 of 100.

COUNT LII: DECEPTIVE ACTS OR PRACTICES IN VIOLATION OF THE WASHINGTON CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, WASH. REV. CODE § 19.86.020

1157. Washington realleges and incorporates herein by reference each of the allegations contained in the preceding paragraph 1 through 850 as though fully alleged in this cause of action.


1158. Meta engaged in deceptive acts or practices affecting Washington consumers, including young users, parents of young users, and Meta advertisers, and in violation of Wash. Rev. Code. § 19.86.020 by making representations, directly or indirectly, expressly or by implication, regarding its Social Media Platforms, including but not limited to the following: (a) that Meta’s Social Media Platforms are not psychologically or physically harmful for young users and children and are not designed to induce compulsive and extended use by young users and children; (b) that Meta’s Social Media Platforms are not addictive and/or are unlikely to result in psychological or physical harm for young users and children; (c) that the incidence or prevalence of negative or harmful user experiences on Meta’s Social Media Platforms is lower than it actually is; (d) that Meta prioritized young users’ and children’s health and safety over maximizing profits; (e) that Meta does not allow the promotion of harmful material on its Social Media Platforms; (f) that under-13 users are effectively excluded by Meta from using Instagram and/or Facebook; (g) that Meta’s collection of user data was not for the purpose of increasing users’ use of the Social Media Platforms; and (h) other deceptive representations.


1159. Meta’s conduct as described herein occurred in trade or commerce within the meaning of the Washington Consumer Protection Act, Wash. Rev. Code. § 19.86.010(2), directly or indirectly affecting the people of the State of Washington.


1160. Meta’s deceptive acts or practices affected the public interest in that they impacted numerous Washington consumers and other consumers.


1161. Meta’s deceptive acts or practices are likely to continue without relief from this Court.


1162. Based on the above deceptive acts or practices, the State of Washington is entitled to relief under the Washington Consumer Protection Act including injunctive relief and restitution pursuant to Wash. Rev. Code. § 19.86.080, civil penalties pursuant to Wash. Rev. Code. § 19.86.140 for each and every violation of Wash. Rev. Code. § 19.86.020, and reimbursement of the costs of this action, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, pursuant to Wash. Rev. Code. § 19.86.080.



Continue Reading Here.


About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.


This court case 4:23-cv-05448 retrieved on October 25, 2023, from Washingtonpost.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction.