As of late, if I’m watching a presentation, and someone is writing code in an editor, that editor is almost always VSCode.
Something’s up, and I’m going to get to the bottom of it. People rave about this thing.
I’ll answer some questions for myself — and, with luck, maybe I can save the JetBrains-faithful some time and energy. I aim to discover:
I’m certainly interested in how VSCode handles Python and C/C++, but I’m not going to explore it in this post.
I used Homebrew Cask to install it:
$ brew cask install visual-studio-code
==> Satisfying dependencies
==> Downloading https://az764295.vo.msecnd.net/stable/f88bbf9137d24d36d968ea6b2911786bfe103002/VSCode-darwin-stable.zip
==> Verifying checksum for Cask visual-studio-code
==> Installing Cask visual-studio-code
==> Moving App 'Visual Studio Code.app' to '/Users/boneskull/Applications/Visual Studio Code.app'.
==> Linking Binary 'code' to '/usr/local/bin/code'.
🍺 visual-studio-code was successfully installed!
This takes ~4s on my 2016 MBP — but I don’t have any extensions installed yet.
I’m greeted with this:
It has also opened a web page in Chrome:
I ignore the web page (thanks, but no thanks) and click a few of the “Install support for…” links under Tools and languages to get some basic extensions installed. I want to avoid customizing too much at the outset. Since C/C++ isn’t listed on the “Welcome Page”, I dig into to the extensions and … can’t help myself from installing a bunch of extensions. Oops.
I am, however, elated to report that the JetBrains IDE Keymap is a thing, and it works great.
I go ahead and open up my Mocha working copy…
OK, so I want to edit Mocha’s
CHANGELOG.md. But I know
origin has changes I need to pull.
Happily, VSCode understands this is, in fact, a working copy. To pull, I found a little “refresh” button in my status bar, and clicked it. I think it worked? It said “sync.” What’s a “sync”?
I’m unsure what just happened. Which changesets did Git pull? I want to look at the history. After searching in vain, I realize that there is no built-in support for Git history, and I’m going to need to grab an extension for this.
GitLens seems to solve this problem (and others). But there are many Git-related extensions for VSCode. This is a drawback of the “small core” philosophy of VSCode (this reminds me of the Node.js ecosystem). To VSCode’s credit, it aids discovery with tags, filters and sorting.
GitLens does some oddball things like “inline blame” and “code lens” (which is another view into “blame”? I don’t get it). I want to turn this noisy stuff off.
GitLens: Toggle Code Lens and
GitLens: Toggle Line Blame Annotations from the Command Palette.
GitLens then provides Git history in the left sidebar. The presentation of the repo is a little disorienting (there are so many trees, it’s like a forest), but I do see the pulled changesets.
I’ve made my changes to
CHANGELOG.md, and it’s time to commit. VSCode helpfully marks the file with a big
M in the file list. +1.
Git: Commit via the Command Palette, and realize I could have used my trusty
⌘-K. But I’m prompted that the stage is empty.
If you only use WebStorm’s built-in version control client (I don’t), this will be culture shock. VSCode uses the stage, like literally every other Git client except WebStorm’s.
I go ahead and commit everything (including unstaged changes; this would be
Git: Commit All if I wanted to avoid the prompt), and push.
Not the nicest initial experience, but I’m confident it’ll be smoother sailing from here.
Next, I’ll run Mocha’s test suites to prepare for publishing.
I think a “Task” is perhaps a “Run Configuration” or “External Tool”.
“Tasks” are not the same as “Tasks” in a WebStorm, which is WebStorm’s (leaky) abstraction around issues, staged changes and branching.
Let’s see what “Configure Tasks” does…
Ooook. that needs some further explanation, but sure. Is it trying to automatically detect my npm scripts? For reference, Mocha’s
scripts in its
package.json is literally just:
"prepublishOnly": "nps test clean build",
"test": "nps test"
I’ll roll the dice with
VSCode creates and opens a
Fascinating. I click the link and learn about this file. It’s unclear whether VSCode intends for the user to commit
.vscode/ to VCS (I don’t do so; in fact, I add
.vscode/ to my
VSCode likely didn’t need me to “configure” the Task — it discovered the script itself. I execute
Run Task…, choose
npm: test, and the output opens in a terminal, as you’d expect.
I’m now certain “Tasks” are analogous to “External Tools”. Like in WebStorm, the user (seemingly) cannot debug a Task, and there’s little integration. VSCode ships with some helpers for common build tools (unfortunately, nps is not one of them). Like WebStorm, the user has free rein to create a “shell”-based Task.
I’m still looking for the analog of a “Run Configuration,” which appears to be a “Debug Configuration,” though it’s just called “Configuration” under VSCode’s “Debug” menu. Next, I’ll take it for a test-drive. Whatever the hell it’s called.
.vscode/to VCS. I’ve never had success committing any sliver of
.idea/to VCS, but maybe the story is different here. Don’t look at me; find some other guinea pig.
Trivia: VSCode recognizes the filetype of
tasks.jsonas “JSON with Comments”, which, AFAIK, is unadulterated, imaginary nonsense. Is it JSON5 or not?
First, I install the Node.js Extension Pack, since I figure I’ll need it to debug properly.
From VSCode’s menu, I open
Debug > Open Configurations. I’m presented with a new file,
tasks.json, this is my config file.
This menu item inexplicably corresponds to the command
Debug: Open launch.json.
Do you want the good news or bad news first? I don’t care.
The bad news is, I can’t just throw
npm test in
launch.json and expect my breakpoints to get hit. Why not? Because
nps, which spawns ten different
mocha processes in series, each which spawn
_mocha, and many of which spawn
This is by no means VSCode’s fault, but the story around debugging subprocesses in Node.js is a sad one. I’d be foolish to expect a miracle.
The good news is that if I choose some subset of the tests to run with
bin/_mocha, debugging works well (unless I want to debug more child processes). It’s a solid debugging experience, though lacking some of the bells & whistles of WebStorm’s debugger.
Debugging tests with Karma, awkward is.
In a WebStorm, you create Karma-based run configuration, point it to your config file, specify any particular browsers or other extra options, and push the button. It works well, even if you happen to be bundling your code with karma-browserify, which Mocha is.
This is the VSCode experience:
chromedebug configuration identical to:
"name": "Attach to Karma",
karma.conf.js(ugh, really?) to add a custom launcher to your setup object. The port below must be the same port as above. Hope it’s not in use!
karma start —-browsers ChromeDebug --auto-watch --no-single-run. Leave it running.
At this point, you can set breakpoint(s) by clicking in the editor’s gutter, though they will not immediately be enabled.
There appears a small, odd, quasi-movable toolbar near the top of the window. Within this impish toolbar is a “refresh”-looking button; click it to re-run the tests. VSCode will then be able to discover which scripts/files Karma loaded. If you’re lucky, it’ll even hit your breakpoint!
The above took a solid hour to figure out, even with a few scattered examples out there.
The last thing I want to evaluate is VSCode’s “IntelliSense” capabilities.
Assuming you use ESLint, install the ESLint extension.
The ESLint extension “just works,” and the user sees the same type of inline inspections as from ESLint within WebStorm, right down to the intentions, like “Fix file with ESLint”.
The Node.js Extension Pack provides some npm-related “IntelliSense,” which knows important stuff about
package.json, like if a package is missing or extraneous, will tell you so, and automatically fix it for you via an intention.
Is “IntelliSense” a trademark or something? It’s a Microsoft-ism, right? I am pretty sure I hate this word.
A “deep dive” into this would be an excellent source of information for WebStorm users (think: CSS, HTML, TypeScript, template languages, etc.), but is unfortunately out-of-scope. I’ll end with my final thoughts below.
Visual Studio Code is better than I expected. It’s comparable with WebStorm — by way of extensions — in terms of feature set. It has a couple notable advantages over WebStorm, however:
Notable disadvantages include:
As a developer, my code editor my most important tool. Having spent many years with JetBrains and WebStorm — and having very little dissatisfaction — a different tool must be incredibly compelling for me to want to pick up.
My advice for WebStorm users? Don’t try VSCode unless you are prepared to switch.