In TypeScript, you might have noticed that you can declare custom types in two different ways. One is with the interface
keyword, and the other is with the type
keyword. As such, you may find yourself wondering why there are two ways to do one thing - and you're not alone. I already covered how to use interfaces and types - but let's look a little bit more into how they differ.
If we define a type in TypeScript, it is not extendable after the fact. For example, consider this custom type I just made up:
type user = {
name: string,
age: number
}
If, after its been defined, I suddenly realise I want to add an address too, I can do this using the following syntax:
type userWithAddress = user & {
address: string
}
With interfaces, we can do the same, but the syntax remains slightly different:
interface user {
name: string;
age: number;
}
interface userWithAddress extends user {
address: string
}
Now userWithAddress
contains all the properties of user
, plus one additional property - that being address
.
The only difference between these two ways of extending types is how they handle conflicts. For example, if you extend an interface and mention a property that has already been defined, an error will be thrown. For example, this will not work:
interface user {
name: string;
}
interface newUser extends user {
name: number;
}
Meanwhile, with type
, you can do this:
type user = {
name: string
}
type newUser = user & {
name: number
}
While this will not throw an error, it may result in some unexpected results - so you should avoid it where necessary. For example, above, the name
property is reduced to type never
- since a type can never
be both string
and number
at the same time. :)
Along the same lines, types
cannot be merged, while interfaces
can if you declare them multiple times. For example, if we have a type, we can't do something like this:
type cat = {
name: string
}
type cat = {
color: string
}
In fact, the above code will throw an error. Meanwhile, with interface
, we can do that - and it'll merge both declarations. So the example below will create a type called cat
with both name
and color
properties:
interface cat {
name: string;
}
interface cat {
color: string;
}
While we can create a type that can be an alias for a primitive type like string
, interface
cannot do this. For example, if you want to create a type called myName
, which is always of type string, we can do it like this:
type myName = string;
Here, myName
becomes an alias for string
- so we can write myName
instead of string
, essentially, anywhere. Meanwhile, interface
does not have this ability. The following cannot and will not work:
interface myName extends string {
}
We can create union types with the type
keyword, but we can't do that with an interface. For example, here, userId
can be a string
or number
:
type userId = string | number
Meanwhile, the above cannot be achieved with an interface
, since the interface defines the shape or type of an object.
If you are using classes in your TypeScript code, they can implement interfaces, but not types. That means the class has to conform to the interface itself. If you define a type
, you cannot use it with a class. For example:
interface user {
name: string;
age: number;
}
class createUser implements user {
name = "John";
age = 143;
}
This makes interface
quite handy if you decide to use classes in your TypeScript code - but as we know, a lot of TypeScript code tends to be functional rather than code based. So this benefit will depend on your codebase.
As you can see, the main differences between type
and interface
kind of depend on the circumstances you use them in. Almost all the features of interface
are available in type
, which means you might find yourself more frequently going to type
. Typically, though, it tends to be based on preference or what works best in your codebase (i.e., using the additional implement
feature of interface
).
In any case, rest assured that it isn't as confusing as you might first think - with both interface
and type
effectively being two ways to do the same thing!
Also published here.