SEC v. Binance Court Filing, retrieved on June 5, 2023 is part of . You can jump to any part in this filing . This is part 66 of 69. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here FACTS IX. BINANCE AND BAM TRADING WERE REQUIRED TO BUT DID NOT REGISTER AS AN EXCHANGE, BROKER-DEALER, OR CLEARING AGENCY. TWELFTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF Violations of Exchange Act Sections 5, 15(a), and 17A(b) (Against Zhao as Control Person over Binance and BAM Trading for the Binance.US Platform Violations) 549. The Commission realleges and incorporates by reference herein the allegations in Paragraphs 1-35 and 80-513. 550. As alleged above, Binance and BAM Trading violated Exchange Act Sections 5, and 17A(b), and BAM Trading violated Exchange Act 15(a) [15 U.S.C. §§ 78e, 78o(a), and 78q1(b)] in connection with their operation of the Binance.US Platform. 551. At all relevant times, Zhao was a control person of Binance and BAM Trading for purposes of Exchange Act Section 20(a) [15 U.S.C. § 78t(a)]. 552. At all relevant times, Zhao exercised power and control over Binance and BAM Trading, including by managing and directing Binance and BAM Trading, and by directing and participating in the acts constituting Binance’s and BAM Trading’s violations of the securities laws. 553. By reason of the foregoing, Zhao is liable as a control person under Exchange Act Section 20(a) [15 U.S.C. § 78t(a)] for Binance’s and BAM Trading’s violations of Exchange Act Sections 5, 15(a), and 17A(b) [15 U.S.C. §§ 78e, 78o(a), and 78q-1(b)]. Continue Reading . Here About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case 1:23-cv-01599 retrieved on September 6, 2023, from is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. docdroid.net

BAM Management and BAM Trading Charged for "Making Materially False Statements and Omissions"

SEC Accuses CZ of Liability as Control Person for Binance's Regulatory Violations

Read My Stories

Too Long; Didn't Read

CTA: Download the FREE AI Productivity Shift report

SEC Claims that CZ's Control of Binance and BAM Trading Led to Regulatory Violations

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

Untitled Story

SEC Seeks Over $1.7 Billion in Penalties from Ripple Labs for Alleged XRP Securities Law Violations

BAM Management and BAM Trading Charged for "Making Materially False Statements and Omissions"

BAM Trading Accused of Operating as an Unregistered Broker on Binance.US Platform

BAM Trading and Binance in the Heart of Crypto Trading Amid Regulatory Challenges

BAM Trading in the Hot Seat for Selling Staking Program As Unregistered Security

SEC Seeks Over $1.7 Billion in Penalties from Ripple Labs for Alleged XRP Securities Law Violations

BAM Management and BAM Trading Charged for "Making Materially False Statements and Omissions"

BAM Trading Accused of Operating as an Unregistered Broker on Binance.US Platform

BAM Trading and Binance in the Heart of Crypto Trading Amid Regulatory Challenges

BAM Trading in the Hot Seat for Selling Staking Program As Unregistered Security

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps