Consensus algorithms are the protocols that govern how a blockchain is secured and how transactions are validated within the network. Bitcoin is well known for its Proof-of-Work algorithm that requires users to set up large mining rigs, while Proof-of-Stake is known for its token staking system. Proof-of-Time is another algorithm that looks at a user's reputation and time within the network, amongst other factors. We'll look at the difference between these three algorithms and how they compare. You can also view a video comparison below: Keep reading below for a readable comparison. Proof-of-Stake (PoS) Proof-of-Stake (PoS) is a mining algorithm and consensus mechanism that relies on nodes within the network staking their tokens to secure the blockchain and validate transactions. Proof-of-Stake works by incentivizing nodes (computers that downloaded a copy of the blockchain) to stake their tokens with a chance of being chosen to verify the next block. This is because each block contains several transactions, and nodes with larger stakes are more likely to be chosen to validate the next block. If a node is chosen to validate a block of transactions, they are rewarded with additional tokens. However, if a node has been caught acting maliciously, it will lose the tokens they have staked. Proof-of-Work (PoW) Proof-of-Work (PoW) is a mining algorithm and consensus mechanism that relies on a miner's computing power to secure the network and validate transactions. Proof-of-Work was the first mining algorithm used to secure the Bitcoin network and was the initial algorithm used by Ethereum before they switched to Proof-of-Work. Proof-of-Work uses a miner's computing power to solve complex mathematical problems, with multiple miners competing to solve them. The more computing power a miner has, the better their chance of solving the puzzle. The successful miner gets to validate the next block of transactions and receive Bitcoins as a reward. However, if the miner is caught acting maliciously, they won't be able to validate the block, meaning their computing power has been wasted. The mining difficulty for Proof-of-Work also changes based on the number of miners on the network. In Bitcoin's early days, anyone could mine BTC using a laptop or computer. However, nowadays, Bitcoin mining requires multiple dedicated graphics cards to provide the computing power needed for the PoW protocol. This is due to the many miners on the Bitcoin network today. Proof-of-Time (PoT) Proof-of-Time (PoT) is a consensus protocol that looks at a node's reputation and time within the network. Analog developed the algorithm, and nodes have to be voted in before they can validate any transactions. Whereas most consensus algorithms work within blockchains, the Proof-of-Time algorithm uses a "Timechain." that assigns a score to a node based on their previous actions and time within the network. Network validators are chosen via a ranking system The nodes staked tokens are also taken into account during this process. The longer a node operates within the Timechain, the more trustworthy it is and the better its chance of being selected. Once a node is selected, it confirms the transactions, generates a VDF proof, and submits the data to the other nodes within the network. 1,000-time electors then double-check the data, and if they agree to accept the transaction, it is added to the network. How the algorithms compare Proof-of-Stake differs from Proof-of-Work and Proof-of-Time since a user's stake is the main determining factor in being chosen to validate the next block. When choosing a node, the protocol does not rely on a validator's energy expenditure, its time within the network, or reputation. Instead, multiple nodes decide who can validate the next block of transactions by randomly selecting from a pool of nodes. Nodes with larger stakes are more likely to be selected in this process. Proof-of-Work differs from Proof-of-Stake and Proof-of-Time since energy use is the determining factor when selecting a miner to validate the next block of transactions. The more energy a miner uses, the better chance they have of solving the mathematical puzzle and being chosen to mine the next block. As mentioned earlier, mining requires physical hardware, and popular networks like Bitcoin require users to invest in expensive hardware to gain a chance at being selected. Proof-of-Time differs from Proof-of-Stake and Proof-of-Work since it considers a node's reputation and time within the network to determine who gets to validate the next block. Nodes are more likely to be selected if they have been active for a long time and have good reputations. A verifiable delay function (or VDF) is used to randomly select nodes while considering the nodes ranking score. Proof-of-Time does share some similarities with Proof-of-Stake since nodes are required to deposit or "stake" tokens. However, nodes within the Timechain use a fixed stake system where every node deposits an equal amount of tokens to be staked. This system is set up to make the process fairer since priority is not given to a node based on the number of staked tokens. Instead, a node's reputation and time in the network are valued more, and the selection process is still randomized. Conclusion Proof-of-Stake is a consensus algorithm that selects nodes based on their staked tokens, with larger stakes improving their chances of being selected. Proof-of-Work relies on a miner's energy output to secure the network, and the more energy and miner uses, the better chances they have of being selected. Proof-of-Time considers a user's reputation, ranking score, and time within the network when selecting a node to validate transactions. The protocol also uses a fixed stake mechanism, so nodes are not selected based on how many tokens they have staked. Instead, once a node is selected, they validate the transactions, generate a VDF proof, and send it to other nodes to be double-checked before being added to the Timechain.

The writer is smart, but don't just like, take their word for it. #DoYourOwnResearch

Ethereum

Can Mass Adoption Be a Reality for Web3 Soon?

How and Why Mango Markets Was Able to Be Exploited by Attackers

Nominated for 2022 - HackerNoon Contributor of the Year - Fintech

Nominated for 2022 - HackerNoon Contributor of the Year - Tokenization

Nominated for 2022 - HackerNoon Contributor of the Year - Future Of Finance

Nominated for 2022 - HackerNoon Contributor of the Year - Data Privacy

Nominated for 2022 - HackerNoon Contributor of the Year - Crypto Adoption

Nominated for 2022 - HackerNoon Contributor of the Year - Privacy

Nominated for 2022 - HackerNoon Contributor of the Year - Economics

Nominated for 2022 - HackerNoon Contributor of the Year - Big Data

Too Long; Didn't Read

Proof-of-Stake vs Proof-of-Work vs Proof-of-Time: What’s the Difference?

Proof-of-Stake vs Proof-of-Work vs Proof-of-Time: What’s the Difference?

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

2 Truly Unique Use Cases of the Metaverse

The Noonification: 2023 Was the Best Time to Accumulate Crypto (1/1/2024)

The Noonification: The Bitcoin Mining Writing Contest by GoMining (1/14/2024)

The Noonification: A Taxonomy of Inclusiveness (1/11/2024)

08/06/2018: Biggest Stories in the Cryptosphere

The Noonification: Much Ado About Bitcoin Halving (1/6/2024)

2 Truly Unique Use Cases of the Metaverse

The Noonification: 2023 Was the Best Time to Accumulate Crypto (1/1/2024)

The Noonification: The Bitcoin Mining Writing Contest by GoMining (1/14/2024)

The Noonification: A Taxonomy of Inclusiveness (1/11/2024)

08/06/2018: Biggest Stories in the Cryptosphere

The Noonification: Much Ado About Bitcoin Halving (1/6/2024)

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Minty

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps