Authors: (1) Nowshin Nawar Arony; (2) Ze Shi Li; (3) Bowen Xu; (4) Daniela Damian. Table of Links Abstract & Introduction Motivation Related Work Methodology A Taxonomy of Inclusiveness Inclusiveness Concerns in Different Types of Apps Inclusiveness Across Different Sources of User Feedback Automated Identification of Inclusiveness User Feedback Discussion Conclusion & References 6 INCLUSIVENESS CONCERNS IN DIFFERENT TYPES OF APPS To answer our second research question, How does inclusiveness related user feedback differ for different types of apps?, we analyzed the distribution of the six major categories in our taxonomy across the fifty apps in our dataset, which consisted of five types of software: business, entertainment, financial, e-commerce, and social media (with ten apps in each type of software). Table 2 illustrates the total number of inclusiveness related user feedback in the five types of apps from across the three sources. We found that 633 out of 1,211 of the inclusiveness related user feedback emerged from social media apps. This is followed by financial apps (212) and entertainment apps (196). Whereas e-commerce (99) and business (71) software contain the least number of inclusiveness posts. The distribution of the inclusiveness categories is shown in Figure 5.Fairness-related concerns represent the most frequently discussed (355 out of 1,211) category and is more prominent for social media, financial, and e-commerce apps. On the contrary, technology is the more dominant category in business and entertainment software and a close second for social media apps. consists of a significant number of user feedback from the 6 categories, particularly for fairness, technology, and usability. These three from social media surpass even the most popular categories for the other app types. However, we note that the other three categories, privacy, demography, and other human values, are still more frequently occurring than in the other apps. Social media We also observed varying levels of popularity for each category depending on the type of app. For example, 45 out of 121 inclusiveness concerns for financial apps are about privacy, which is to be expected as financial apps obtain confidential information from users, and it is their responsibility to adequately safeguard this data. Similarly, we find demography to be a popular category for entertainment type of software. Demography being popular in this context appears reasonable, given that location, language, and socioeconomic status may impact the content provided or suggested in entertainment apps. For business apps, we found technology as the most popular. Since productivity is critical for business apps, technological restrictions that prevent users from completing their tasks and work would definitely be a high area of concern. This paper is under CC 4.0 license. available on arxiv

Augmentastic || Augmented Reality

Inclusiveness Across Different Sources of User Feedback

A Taxonomy of Inclusiveness

FeedbackLoop.TECH

Read My Stories

Too Long; Didn't Read

Get Free Unlimited IP Geo Data With IPinfo Lite

Inclusiveness Concerns in Different Types of Apps

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

Untitled Story

A Detailed Analysis of Inter-Annotator Agreement

It Is Okay If You Don't Know What You Like. We Do (feat. Deep Recommendation Algorithms)

10 Machine Learning, Data Science, and Deep Learning Courses for Programmers in 2020

10 Computer Vision Startups on Product Hunt with the Most Upvotes

10 Best Entry Level Machine Learning Tutorials

A Detailed Analysis of Inter-Annotator Agreement

It Is Okay If You Don't Know What You Like. We Do (feat. Deep Recommendation Algorithms)

10 Machine Learning, Data Science, and Deep Learning Courses for Programmers in 2020

10 Computer Vision Startups on Product Hunt with the Most Upvotes

10 Best Entry Level Machine Learning Tutorials

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps