paint-brush
BAM Management and BAM Trading Charged for "Making Materially False Statements and Omissions"by@secagainsttheworld
125 reads

BAM Management and BAM Trading Charged for "Making Materially False Statements and Omissions"

by SEC vs. the WorldOctober 1st, 2023
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story w/o Javascript
tldt arrow

Too Long; Didn't Read

The SEC has accused BAM Management and BAM Trading of violating Securities Act Sections 17(a)(2) and (a)(3) through deceptive practices involving materially false statements and omissions in securities sales. This legal action seeks to address these alleged violations and their potential consequences.

People Mentioned

Mention Thumbnail
featured image - BAM Management and BAM Trading Charged for "Making Materially False Statements and Omissions"
SEC vs. the World HackerNoon profile picture

SEC v. Binance Court Filing, retrieved on June 5, 2023 is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This is part 67 of 69.

FACTS

IX. BINANCE AND BAM TRADING WERE REQUIRED TO BUT DID NOT REGISTER AS AN EXCHANGE, BROKER-DEALER, OR CLEARING AGENCY.


THIRTEENTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

Violations of Securities Act Sections 17(a)(2) and (a)(3)

(Against BAM Management and BAM Trading)


554. The Commission realleges and incorporates by reference herein the allegations in Paragraphs 1-35, 110-324, and 352-513


555. At all relevant times, by engaging in the conduct alleged in this Complaint, specifically by making materially false and misleading statements to investors and engaging in acts and practices that operated as a fraud upon purchasers, BAM Management and BAM Trading have, in the offer or sale of securities by the use of the means and instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by use of the mails, directly or indirectly, obtained money or property by means of one or more untrue statements of a material fact or omissions of a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading, and engaged in one or more transactions, practices, or courses of business which operated or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser.


556. By reasons of the foregoing, BAM Management and BAM Trading, directly or indirectly, singly or in concert, have violated, and unless enjoined will again violate, Securities Act Section 17(a)(2)-(3) [15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)(2) and 77q(a)(3)].



Continue Reading Here.


About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.


This court case 1:23-cv-01599 retrieved on September 6, 2023, from docdroid.net is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction.