paint-brush
Did Microsoft Violate the Sherman Act? Findings of Factby@legalpdf

Did Microsoft Violate the Sherman Act? Findings of Fact

by Legal PDF: Tech Court CasesAugust 25th, 2023
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story w/o Javascript
tldt arrow

Too Long; Didn't Read

United States Of America v. Microsoft Corporation Court Filing by Thomas Penfield Jackson, November 5, 1999, is part of Hackernoon.com's Legal PDF series. This is part 1 of 57.

People Mentioned

Mention Thumbnail
featured image - Did Microsoft Violate the Sherman Act? Findings of Fact
Legal PDF: Tech Court Cases HackerNoon profile picture

United States Of America. v. Microsoft Corporation Court Filing by Thomas Penfield Jackson, November 5, 1999, is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This is part 1 of 58.

FINDINGS OF FACT

These consolidated civil antitrust actions alleging violations of the Sherman Act, §§ 1 and 2, and various state statutes by the defendant Microsoft Corporation, were tried to the Court, sitting without a jury, between October 19, 1998, and June 24, 1999.


The Court has considered the record evidence submitted by the parties, made determinations as to its relevancy and materiality, assessed the credibility of the testimony of the witnesses, both written and oral, and 2 ascertained for its purposes the probative significance of the documentary and visual evidence presented.


Upon the record before the Court as of July 28, 1999, at the close of the admission of evidence, pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 52(a), the Court finds the following facts to have been proved by a preponderance of the evidence. The Court shall state the conclusions of law to be drawn therefrom in a separate Memorandum and Order to be filed in due course.

Continue reading here.


About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.


This court case Civil Action No. 98-1232 (TPJ) and Civil Action No. 98-1233 (TPJ) retrieved on 01-19-2023, from justice.gov is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction.