paint-brush
Binance's Alleged Violations of Commodity Exchange Laws by@legalpdf

Binance's Alleged Violations of Commodity Exchange Laws

by Legal PDF: Tech Court CasesSeptember 8th, 2023
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story w/o Javascript
tldt arrow

Too Long; Didn't Read

Binance, accused of operating without proper registration, faces allegations of violating the Commodity Exchange Act and regulations. This legal battle involves claims against key individuals within the organization, shedding light on their alleged roles in these violations.

People Mentioned

Mention Thumbnail
featured image - Binance's Alleged Violations of Commodity Exchange Laws
Legal PDF: Tech Court Cases HackerNoon profile picture

FTC v. Binance Court Filing, retrieved on March 27, 2023 is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This is part 26 of 31.

VI. VIOLATIONS OF THE COMMODITY EXCHANGE ACT AND REGULATIONS

COUNT IV


Violations of Section 5h(a)(1) of the Act, 7 U.S.C. § 7b-3(1), and Regulation 37.3(a)(1), 17 C.F.R. § 37.3(a)(1) (2022)


Failure to Register as a Designated Contract Market or Swap Execution Facility


210. Paragraphs 1 through 186 of this Complaint are re-alleged and incorporated herein by reference.


211. During the Relevant Period, Defendants Binance Holdings, Binance IE, and Binance Services, all acting as a common enterprise and doing business as Binance, and through their officers, employees, and agents, violated and are continuing to violate 7 U.S.C. § 7b-3 and 17 C.F.R. § 37.3(a)(1) by operating a facility for the trading of swaps on digital assets that are commodities including BTC, ETH and LTC without registering with the CFTC as a DCM or a SEF.


212. Binance has operated and is continuing to operate a trading system or platform in which more than one market participant has the ability to execute or trade swaps with more than one other market participant on the system or platform, including the trading or processing of swap on digital assets that are commodities without being registered as a DCM or SEF.


213. Certain products that have traded on Binance, including “perpetual futures” or “perpetual contracts” on BTC, ETH and/or LTC are swaps as defined by 7 U.S.C. § 1a(47).


214. Each act in violation of 7 U.S.C. § 7b-3 and 17 C.F.R. § 37.3, including, but not limited to, those specifically alleged herein, is alleged as a separate and distinct violation.


215. During the Relevant Period, Zhao directly or indirectly controlled Binance, and did not act in good faith or knowingly induced, directly or indirectly, the acts constituting Binance’s violations described in this Count. Therefore, pursuant to 7 U.S.C. § 13c(b), Zhao is liable as a control person for Binance’s violations described in this Count.


216. The acts and omissions of Zhao, Lim, and other officers, employees, or agents acting for Binance described in this Complaint were done within the scope of their office, employment, or agency with Binance. Therefore, pursuant to 7 U.S.C. § 2(a)(1)(B) and 17 C.F.R. § 1.2, Binance is liable as a principal for each act, omission, or failure of the other officers, employees, or agents acting for Binance, constituting violations of 7 U.S.C. § 7b-3 and 17 C.F.R. § 37.3.


217. From July 2019 through at least January 2022 and while acting as Binance’s Chief Compliance Officer, Lim willfully aided, abetted, counseled, commanded, induced, or procured the acts constituting Binance’s violations described in this Count, or acted in combination or concert with any other person in any such violation, or willfully caused an act to be done or omitted which if directly performed or omitted by Lim or another would constitute a violation described in this Count. Pursuant to 7 U.S.C. § 13c(a), Lim is therefore liable for Binance’s violations described in this Count to the same extent as Binance.



Continue Reading Here.


About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.


This court case 1:23-cv-01887 retrieved on September 4, 2023, from docdroid.net is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction.