PARAG AGRAWAL VIJAYA GADDE, and NED SEGAL v. twitter Court Filing, retrieved on April 10, 2023 is part of . You can jump to any part in this filing . This is part 32 of 38. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here EXHIBIT I - UNDERTAKING TO REPAY ADVANCEMENT OF EXPENSES Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103 Attn: Chief Executive Officer; General Counsel/ Legal Department Re: Undertaking to Repay Advancement of Expenses This undertaking is being provided pursuant to that certain Indemnification Agreement, entered into on or about October 1, 2013 by and between Twitter, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and the undersigned as Indemnitee (the "Indemnification Agreement"). Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed in the Indemnification Agreement. I became party to a lawsuit captioned D'Ambly v. Exoo et al., No. 2-20-cv-12880 (JMV) (D.N.J.) (the "D'Ambly Lawsuit"). Additionally, I received a formal request from the House Committee on Oversight and Reform to testify at a public hearing regarding "Big Tech's" control of free discourse and information sharing during the 118th Congress, and the leaders of other House and Senate committees as well as other Members of Congress also have publicly signaled that they are likely to request sworn interviews, private briefings, or public testimony from me related to my role at the Company (collectively the "Inquiries," and together with the D'Ambly Lawsuit, the "Proceedings"). My involvement in the Proceedings is by reason of the fact that I formerly was an officer of the Company. By letter dated January 13, 2023, my counsel requested that Expenses incurred in the Proceedings on my behalf be advanced by the Company pursuant to Section 5 of the Indemnification Agreement. In connection with the request for advancement of Expenses, I hereby undertake to repay any amounts paid, advanced, or reimbursed by the Company for such Expense advances to the extent that it is ultimately determined that I am not entitled to indemnification under the Indemnification Agreement or otherwise. This undertaking shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, without regard to the principles of conflicts of laws thereof. Sincerely, Continue Reading . Here About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case 2023-0409 retrieved on October 4, 2023, from is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. int.nyt.com

Ned Segal: What He Has to Say About the Undertaking

eBay Inc.'s Use of Interstate Commerce for Harassment

Too Long; Didn't Read

Make resilience your competitive advantage

Vijaya Gadde and How They'll Repay the Advancement of Expenses

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

Untitled Story

Judge Rules Anthropic’s Use of Books for AI Training Was Legal, but Pirated Copies Raise Liability

A Full Look at Parag Agrawal's Letter to Twitter Inc.

Amendments in the Twitter Lawsuit: What This Means for Stockholders

Details of the Twitter Lawsuit: Letters Between Both Sides' Lawyers

Former Twitter Execs Sue the Company: Get to Know Their Counsel

Judge Rules Anthropic’s Use of Books for AI Training Was Legal, but Pirated Copies Raise Liability

A Full Look at Parag Agrawal's Letter to Twitter Inc.

Amendments in the Twitter Lawsuit: What This Means for Stockholders

Details of the Twitter Lawsuit: Letters Between Both Sides' Lawyers

Former Twitter Execs Sue the Company: Get to Know Their Counsel

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps