paint-brush
Ned Segal Officially Declares That All of His Statements Against Twitter Are True and Correctby@legalpdf
248 reads

Ned Segal Officially Declares That All of His Statements Against Twitter Are True and Correct

by Legal PDF: Tech Court CasesNovember 4th, 2023
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story w/o Javascript
tldt arrow

Too Long; Didn't Read

Ned Segal signs a statement declaring all of his statements true.

People Mentioned

Mention Thumbnail
featured image - Ned Segal Officially Declares That All of His Statements Against Twitter Are True and Correct
Legal PDF: Tech Court Cases HackerNoon profile picture

PARAG AGRAWAL VIJAYA GADDE, and NED SEGAL v. twitter Court Filing, retrieved on April 10, 2023 is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This is part 13 of 38.

VERIFICATION PURSUANT TO DELAWARE UNIFORM UNSWORN FOREIGN DECLARATIONS ACT (10 DEL. C.§ 5351et seq.) DECLARED UNDER 10 DEL. C. § 5356

I, Ned Segal, pursuant to the Delaware Uniform Unsworn Foreign Declarations Act (10 Del. C. § 5351 et seq.), declare as follows:


1. I am a plaintiff in this action.


2. I have reviewed the Verified Complaint for Advancement (the "Complaint").


3. To the extent the allegations in the Complaint concern my actions or matters of which I have direct personal knowledge, I know those allegations to be true and correct.


4. To the extent the allegations in the Complaint concern matters of which I do not have direct personal knowledge, I believe those allegations to be true and correct.


I declare under penalty of perjury under the law of Delaware that the foregoing is true and correct, and that I am physically located outside the geographic boundaries of the United States, Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, and any territory or insular possession subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.




Continue Reading Here.


About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.


This court case 2023-0409 retrieved on October 4, 2023, from int.nyt.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction.