Polkadot Vs. COSMOS Vs. Octopus Network Vs. NEAR Protocol: Fat Hubs Are Better Than Hub Minimalismby@oct_network
12,638 reads

Polkadot Vs. COSMOS Vs. Octopus Network Vs. NEAR Protocol: Fat Hubs Are Better Than Hub Minimalism

January 7th 2022
9 min
by @oct_network 12,638 reads
tldt arrow
Read on Terminal Reader🖨️

Too Long; Didn't Read

Ethereum has been unable to maintain its dominance due to scalability constraints. New public blockchains have continued to emerge. The future of blockchain won't be one-chain-fits-all but rather an Internet of Blockchains. Some well-respected multichain cryptonetworks follow a Hub Minimalism approach, pushing DeFi off to their sub-chains. But, just like a non-financial business doesn’t need to establish its own bank, non-financial web3 chains don't need their own DeFi. They need a Fat Hub.

People Mentioned

Mention Thumbnail
Mention Thumbnail

Companies Mentioned

Mention Thumbnail
Mention Thumbnail

Coins Mentioned

Mention Thumbnail
Mention Thumbnail
featured image - Polkadot Vs. COSMOS Vs. Octopus Network Vs. NEAR Protocol: Fat Hubs Are Better Than Hub Minimalism
Octopus Network HackerNoon profile picture

@oct_network

Octopus Network

react to story with heart

RELATED STORIES

L O A D I N G
. . . comments & more!
Hackernoon hq - po box 2206, edwards, colorado 81632, usa