paint-brush
Plaintiffs Parag Agrawal, Vijaya Gadde, and Ned Segal, Depart Twitterby@legalpdf

Plaintiffs Parag Agrawal, Vijaya Gadde, and Ned Segal, Depart Twitter

by Legal PDF: Tech Court CasesApril 24th, 2023
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story w/o Javascript
tldt arrow

Too Long; Didn't Read

Parag Agrawal, Vijaya Gadde, and Ned Segal v. Twitter, Inc. Court Filing by Friedlander & Gorris, P.A., April 10, 2023 is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series.
featured image - Plaintiffs Parag Agrawal, Vijaya Gadde, and Ned Segal, Depart Twitter
Legal PDF: Tech Court Cases HackerNoon profile picture

Parag Agrawal, Vijaya Gadde, and Ned Segal v. Twitter, Inc. Court Filing by Friedlander & Gorris, P.A., April 10, 2023 is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This is part 6 of 10.

Featured Image Generated Using Stable Diffusion 2.1 Using the Following Prompt: “Employees exiting twitter HQ”.

VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR ADVANCEMENT

Plaintiffs Parag Agrawal, Vijaya Gadde, and Ned Segal (Plaintiffs), by and through their undersigned attorneys, upon knowledge as to themselves and their own actions and upon information and belief as to all other matters, allege as follows:

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs Depart Twitter

  1. On or about October 27, 2022, Elon Musk informed each of Agrawal, Gadde, and Segal that their employment with the Company was terminated as of the close of the merger by which Musk took control of the Company.


  2. Section 11 of the Agreements provides that the Company's obligation to indemnify and advance Expenses incurred by Plaintiffs remains in effect following Plaintiffs' terminations, as the Company's obligations "shall continue thereafter so long as Indemnitee shall be subject to any Proceeding . . . by reason of his Corporate Status, whether or not he is acting or serving in any such capacity at the time any liability or expense is incurred for which indemnification can be provided under this Agreement." Id. § 11; see also id. § 14(g) (providing that a "Proceeding" includes that in which Indemnitee "was, is or will be involved as a party or otherwise, by reason of the fact that Indemnitee is or was an officer or director of the Company") (emphasis added).


Continue Reading Here.


About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.


This court case No. 2023-0409 retrieved on April 10, 2023, from int.NYT is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction.