paint-brush
Per Grand Jury, SBF *knowingly* misappropriates FTX customers' deposits to fund Alamedaby@legalpdf
124 reads

Per Grand Jury, SBF *knowingly* misappropriates FTX customers' deposits to fund Alameda

by Legal PDF: Tech Court CasesDecember 16th, 2022
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story w/o Javascript

Too Long; Didn't Read

SAMUEL BANKMAN-FRIED, a/k/a "SBF," is accused of defrauding customers of FTX.com by misappropriating those customers' deposits, and using those deposits to pay expenses and debts of Alameda Research, BANKman­-Fried's proprietary crypto hedge fund, and to make investments. The court-created documents provided by PACER are works of the federal government. They are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction.

People Mentioned

Mention Thumbnail
featured image - Per Grand Jury, SBF *knowingly* misappropriates FTX customers' deposits to fund Alameda
Legal PDF: Tech Court Cases HackerNoon profile picture


US v. Bankman-Fried, 22-cr-673 Court Filing, Dec 13 2022 is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This is part 2 of 9.


COUNT TWO: Wire Fraud on Customers


The Grand Jury further charges:


  1. From at least in or about 2019, up to and including in or about November 2022, in the Southern District of New York and elsewhere, SAMUEL BANKMAN-FRIED, a/k/a "SBF," the defendant, knowingly having devised and intending to devise a scheme and artifice to defraud, and for obtaining money and property by means of false and fraudulent pretenses, representations and promises, transmitted and caused to be transmitted by means of wire, radio, and television communication in interstate and foreign commerce, writings, signs, signals, pictures, and sounds for the purpose of executing such scheme and artifice, to wit, BANKMAN-FRIED, along with others, engaged in a scheme to defraud customers of FTX.com by misappropriating those customers' deposits, and using those deposits to pay expenses and debts of Alameda Research, BANKMAN­-FRIED's proprietary crypto hedge fund, and to make investments.


    (Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1343 and 2.)


Continue Reading here


About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.


This court case (US v. Bankman-Fried, 22-cr-673 (Abrams), retrieved on Dec 15 2022) is part of the public domain. The court-created documents provided by PACER are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction.