Open AI reply to amended complaint Court Filing Kandis A. Westmore, November 3, 2023, is part of . You can jump to any part in this filing . This is part 6 of 13. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here II. ARGUMENT C. Plaintiffs Fail to Plead a DMCA Claim Under Section 1202(b) Plaintiffs spend much of the DMCA section of their Opposition (Opp. at 11-16) addressing arguments that OpenAI did not make in its motion. (See MTD at 10-14.) Defendants are not relitigating issues the Court has ruled on. Rather, Defendants’ DMCA arguments are limited to two issues pertaining to newly pled facts in the FAC: (1) Plaintiffs’ specific examples of “removal” are not removal of CMI from a work at all; and (2) the alleged “removals” from these added examples are not from identical copies of Plaintiffs’ works.[1] (Id.) Continue Reading . Here About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case 3:22-cv-06823-KAW retrieved on September 2, 2023, from is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. Storage.Courtlistener