paint-brush
Mutations of noncommutative crepant resolutions: Main resultsby@eigenvector
123 reads

Mutations of noncommutative crepant resolutions: Main results

by Eigenvector Initialization Publication
Eigenvector Initialization Publication HackerNoon profile picture

Eigenvector Initialization Publication

@eigenvector

Cutting-edge research & publications dedicated t0 eigenvector theory, shaping diverse...

June 9th, 2024
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story in a terminal
Print this story
Read this story w/o Javascript
Read this story w/o Javascript

Too Long; Didn't Read

This paper studies equivalences between magic windows that correspond to wall-crossings in a hyperplane arrangement in terms of NCCRs.
featured image - Mutations of noncommutative crepant resolutions: Main results
1x
Read by Dr. One voice-avatar

Listen to this story

Eigenvector Initialization Publication HackerNoon profile picture
Eigenvector Initialization Publication

Eigenvector Initialization Publication

@eigenvector

Cutting-edge research & publications dedicated t0 eigenvector theory, shaping diverse science & technological fields.

Learn More
LEARN MORE ABOUT @EIGENVECTOR'S
EXPERTISE AND PLACE ON THE INTERNET.
0-item

STORY’S CREDIBILITY

Academic Research Paper

Academic Research Paper

Part of HackerNoon's growing list of open-source research papers, promoting free access to academic material.

Authors:

(1) Wahei Hara;

(2) Yuki Hirano.

4. Main results

4.1. Wall crossing and tilting equivalence. This section shows that wall-crossings of magic windows correspond to equivalences that are induced by tilting modules.


image


image


Proof. By Teleman’s quantization theorem [Tel], for all k ∈ Z, the natural restriction map induces an isomorphism


image


image


image


of equivalences is commutative.


Proof. (1) The adjunction gives an isomorphism


image


Therefore we only need to prove that the right hand sides of (4.E) and (4.F) are isomorphic functors. But this follows from a natural isomorphism


image


image


image


Lemma 4.8. Notation is same as above.


image


(2) This also follows from Lemma 3.19 and the fact that µδ,δ′ is a bijection.


(3) This is a consequence of (2).


For each F ∈ F(δ,δ′)


image


Theorem 4.9. Notation is same as above.



image


image


image


image


image


image


image


image


image


image


image


image


image


image


This paper is available on arxiv under CC0 1.0 DEED license.


L O A D I N G
. . . comments & more!

About Author

Eigenvector Initialization Publication HackerNoon profile picture
Eigenvector Initialization Publication@eigenvector
Cutting-edge research & publications dedicated t0 eigenvector theory, shaping diverse science & technological fields.

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN...

Permanent on Arweave
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story in a terminal
 Terminal
Read this story w/o Javascript
Read this story w/o Javascript
 Lite
X REMOVE AD