paint-brush
哦,只是一个鲜明的技术分析经过@sin7y
4,570 讀數
4,570 讀數

哦,只是一个鲜明的技术分析

经过 Sin7Y2022/06/11
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story w/o Javascript

太長; 讀書

对证明系统 STARK 的深入技术分析。 它大致包括 3 个主要步骤,构建跟踪、跟踪证明和验证证明。第 2 步,“Prover for Trace”由 9 个子步骤组成,从“AIR 实例化”到“建立证明对象”。 步骤 3,“验证证明”由 4 个子步骤组成,即“Ood 一致性检查”、“实例化 FRI 验证器对象”、“计算查询位置的深度多边形”和“执行 FRI VERIFY 过程”。

Companies Mentioned

Mention Thumbnail
Mention Thumbnail
featured image - 哦,只是一个鲜明的技术分析
Sin7Y HackerNoon profile picture



以下是检查 STARK 深入流程的一些步骤。


Step1 - 构建跟踪(fib2-example)

标有“红色”的数字是公开信息。


 Some assertion: Form: [register, step, value] examples: [0,0,1], [1,0,1], [1,7,987]

第 2 步 - 跟踪证明者

协议参数的选择:


 pub struct ProofOptions { num_queries: u8, // number of queries to increase reliability blowup_factor: u8, // domain extension factor grinding_factor: u8, // ?nonce security parameter, for the security selection of query position hash_fn: HashFunction, // Hash Function blake3-259/192, sha3-256 field_extension: FieldExtension, // Whether the field extension is conducted fri_folding_factor: u8, // The folding factor of Fri protocol 4-8-16 fri_max_remainder_size: u8, // The max remainder of Fri protocol }

1. AIR 实例化

FibAir { context: AirContext::new(trace_info, degrees, options), result: pub_inputs, } AirContext { options, // protocol parameters trace_info, // trace parameters: row number and col number transition_constraint_degrees, // transition the constraint degree, and if the multiplication of two registers is involved, then degree = 2; similarly, if the multiplication of three registers is involved, then degree = 3; if periodic column exists, then degree = base + period.length – 1 ce_blowup_factor, // constraint computational domain extension factor trace_domain < ce_domain < lde_domain trace_domain_generator: B::get_root_of_unity(log2(trace_length)), lde_domain_generator: B::get_root_of_unity(log2(lde_domain_size)), }

2.验证AIR和Trace(Debug模块)的一致性

2.1 验证基本参数

Trace.width = air.trace_width

2.2 验证断言的有效性(边界cs)

 Trace[assertion_i.register][assertion_i.step] = assertion_i.value

2.2 验证Trace是否保持Transition cs(调试模块)

 Loop: For every two adjacent rows: pub struct EvaluationFrame<E: FieldElement> { current: Vec<E>, next: Vec<E>, } Holds: next[0] == cur[0] + cur[1] next[1] == next[0] + cur[1] The number of times of Loop: Trace.length - 1

成绩单

write.into(air, public info)

3. 提交跟踪

域参数选择:


 StarkDomain { trace_twiddles, /ntt twiddle factor ce_domain_size: air.ce_domain_size(), //constraint computational domain ce_to_lde_blowup: air.lde_domain_size() / air.ce_domain_size(), // LDE domain domain_offset: air.domain_offset(), //domain offset }

3.1 插值 -> LDE -> 评估 LDE 域

3.2 承诺

成绩单

write.into(cm_to_trace)

4.评估CS

4.1 获得线性组合系数

Ok(ConstraintCompositionCoefficients { transition: t_coefficients, boundary: b_coefficients, })


系数个数与约束数一致
在这个示例(fib2-example)中,有 2 个过渡 cs 和 3 个边界 cs。

4.2 为t-cs和b-cs建立Evaluator

4.2.1 t-cs


 1. Obtain the degree of t-cs (In this example, the degree is [1,1], refer to Chapter 2.3) 2. Establish the t-cs group (record the parameters needed for reaching the object of degree -> compose degree(ce_domain_size - 1) Loop: Calculate the evaluate-degree = base * (trace.length - 1) + tracce.length / period.cycle *(period.length - 1) of every t-cs Establish the t-cs group according to the degree: TransitionConstraintGroup { degree, // the degree of t-cs degree_adjustment, // The space to reach the object degree, target_degree = composition_degree + trace_poly_degree(vanish poly-degree), degree_adjustment = (target_degree - evaluation_degree) indexes: vec![], coefficients: vec![], } Record index and distribution coefficient “coef” Cycle each t-cs (In fib2-example, cycle twice) 3. Establish the period value table 4. Set the divisor for t-cs, with all t-cs having the same form z(x) = x^n-1 / x - g^{n-1} // The last value does not satisfy the condition


4.2.2 b-cs


 1. The divisor of each b-cs is not necessarily the same 2. Judge that if the number of assertions is the same as the number of coefficients to be distributed assertion.len() == coefficients.len() 3. Establish the b-cs group Loop: Obtain the type and initial step of the assertion Establish the b-cs group BoundaryConstraintGroup { constraints: Vec::new(), divisor, // The divisor corresponding to the boundary degree_adjustment, target//The space to reach the object degree, target_degree = composition_degree + divisor.degree(),degree_adjustment = (target_degree - trace_poly_degree) } Add b-cs forms air::BoundaryConstraint { register: assertion.register, // Corresponding register index poly, // assertion value polynomial, interpolation is required for multiple values; otherwise, it is a single value poly_offset, //offset information. If the assert is in the first step, it is [0,1], otherwise it is [1, T] cc, // Coefficient distributed to this b-cs } prover::BoundaryConstraintGroup { degree_adjustment: group.degree_adjustment(), single_value_constraints: Vec::new(),// corresponding Sigle value assertion small_poly_constraints: Vec::new(),//assertion whose assertion value num is smaller than 63 large_poly_constraints: Vec::new(),//assertion whose assertion value num is larger than 63, the values in ce_domain are needed to conduct Pre_compute };

4.3 评估 t/s-cs Over ce_domain

4.3.1 定义评估者表


ConstraintEvaluationTable<B: StarkField, E: FieldElement<BaseField = B>> { evaluations: Vec<Vec<E>>, //[ce_domain_size][t_cs_merge_value (0): b_cs_values(1...)] divisors: Vec<ConstraintDivisor<B>>, // [t-cs divisor, b-cs divisor] domain_offset: B, trace_length: usize, #[cfg(debug_assertions)] t_evaluations: Vec<Vec<B>>, #[cfg(debug_assertions)] t_expected_degrees: Vec<usize>, } evaluations[step_i][0] += sum_{j}(evaluation[j] * (coefficients.0 + coefficients.1 * xp) // The divisor is identical. evaluations[step_i][j] += (evframe.cur().state[register] - value) * (coefficients.0 + coefficients.1 * xp) // for single assertion evaluations[step_i][j] += (evframe.cur().state[register] - polynom::eval(&self.poly, x * self.x_offset)) * (coefficients.0 + coefficients.1 * xp) // for multiassertion // for multi-assertion evaluations[step_i][j] += (evframe.cur().state[register] - self.values[values_index]) * (coefficients.0 + coefficients.1 * xp) // for multiassertion // for multi-assertion large poly

5. 评估 CS 的承诺

5.1 建立约束组合多项式

5.2 对组合 Poly 的承诺

例子:
Compose_poly = a * x^3 + b * x^2 + c * x + d = (a * x^2 + c) * x^ + (b * x^2 + d) (a * x^2 + c ) 和 (b *x^2 +d) 分别对应两列。


6.建立DEEP组合多项式

一般形式:f(x) = q(x)* t(x)
需要随机检查 z


  1. f(z) = q(z) * t(z)


  2. f(x),q(x),t(x) 确实分别等于 f(z), q(z), t(z)


  3. 计算 Deep_composition = (q(x) - q(z)) / (x - z)


  4. 检查 q_q(x) 的 LDT

6.1 选择z which out of Domain(ood)

画一个域外点z。根据 E 的类型,该点要么从基本字段中绘制,要么从 E 定义的扩展字段中绘制。
此处从扩展字段(而不是基本字段)进行采样的目的是为了提高安全性

6.2 在 OOD 点 z 处评估迹和约束多项式

6.2.1 z & z * g 处的 trace_poly


 ood_frame = {cur: [trace_poly_0(z), trace_poly_1(z)], next: [trace_poly_0(z * g), trace_poly_1(z * g)]}


6.2.2 z 处的合成 Poly


 iter!(self.columns).map(|p| polynom::eval(p, z^m)).collect() // m is the column num of the composition poly

6.3 建立深度合成多项式

6.3.1 生成随机数


pub struct DeepCompositionCoefficients<E: FieldElement> { /// Trace polynomial composition coefficients $\alpha_i$, $\beta_i$, and $\gamma_i$. pub trace: Vec<(E, E, E)>, /// Constraint column polynomial composition coefficients $\delta_j$. pub constraints: Vec<E>, /// Degree adjustment composition coefficients $\lambda$ and $\mu$. pub degree: (E, E), }


6.3.2 Cal 商数聚


=> for trace polynomial T`(x) = alpha * (T(x) - T(z)) // degree = trace.length - 1 T``(x) = beta * (T(x) - T(z * g)) T```(x) = gamma * (T(x) - T(z_conjugate)) merge_trace_composition_poly = T(x) / (x - z) + T``(x) / (x - z * g) + T```(x) / (x - z_conjugate) Degree = trace.lengh - 2 => for composition polynomial compute H'_i(x) = (H_i(x) - H_i(z^m)) / (x - z^m) sum(H`_i(x) * cc_i) Deep_composition_polynomial = merge_trace_composition_poly + sum(H`_i(x) * cc_i) Degree = trace.length - 2 => Deep_composition_polynomial degree adjustment Deep_composition_polynomial = Deep_composition_polynomial * (cc_0 + x * cc_1) Degree = trace.length – 1

6.4 评估深度超过 LDE

 deep_evaluations<lde_domain_size> = deep_composition_poly.evaluate(&domain);

7.计算Deep的FRI Layer num

 trace.length() = fold_factor ^ Layer_num + remainder_size; fold_factor = {4, 8, 16} remainder_size < remainder_max_size == 256 

8. 确定查询的位置

从 lde_domain 中选择查询的多个位置。

 fold_position = source_position % (fold_domain) fold_domain = source_domain / fold_factor

9. 建立证明对象

9.1 生成 FRI 证明

pub struct FriProof { layers: Vec<FriProofLayer>, remainder: Vec<u8>, // last poly <all coefficients> num_partitions: u8, // stored as power of 2 } pub struct FriProofLayer { values: Vec<u8>, paths: Vec<u8>, } 


9.2 查询以上位置的迹多边形

与上述类似


Queries::new(trace_proof, trace_states)

9.3 查询以上位置的约束多边形

与上述类似


Queries::new(merkle_proof, evaluations)

9.4 建立 STARK 证明

StarkProof { context: self.context, commitments: self.commitments, ood_frame: self.ood_frame, trace_queries, constraint_queries, fri_proof, pow_nonce: self.pow_nonce, }

第 3 步 - 验证证明

从成绩单中读取 pub-info 以获取相关数据,然后执行验证过程。

1. 一致性检查

验证第 5.2 章中描述的数学关系的一致性


=> for Boundary b(z) = q_b(x) * b_divisor(z) => for composition poly t(z) = q_z(x) * t_divisor(z)

2. 实例化 FRI-Verifier 对象

pub struct FriVerifier<B, E, C, H> where B: StarkField, E: FieldElement<BaseField = B>, C: VerifierChannel<E, Hasher = H>, H: ElementHasher<BaseField = B>, { max_poly_degree: usize, domain_size: usize, domain_generator: B, layer_commitments: Vec<H::Digest>, //flod_poly commitment layer_alphas: Vec<E>, // random numbers options: FriOptions, num_partitions: usize, _channel: PhantomData<C>, }

3. 计算查询位置的深度多边形

计算方法同第 6.4 章

4. 执行 FRI VERIFY 流程