All web applications display dynamic information that is fetched from the computer resources that support the web application (in contrast to web sites, which may only display static content). In many cases a web application is supported by a web server like Tomcat or by “serverless” components like Amazon Web Services (AWS) Lambda. To simplify the discussion in this article, the back end system will be referred to as a web server.
When the web application page is displayed, it will contain the dynamic information fetched from the web server. There are two ways that dynamic information from the server can be included in the web page:
This article discusses three template engines that can be used for server side rendering for a Java application that leverages the Spring framework.
The image below shows part of a screen capture for the AWS Cognito demonstration application. This simple page is displayed after the user logs into the application. The page displays the user name (bear) and some simple profile information for the user.
The data is included in the web page using template engine markup in the HTML. In the example below, FreeMarker markup is used.
The HTML for this section of the web page is shown below:
In the Spring Model-View-Controller paradigm, each web page has an associated controller class that contains functions that handle the web page interactions (e.g., HTTP GET and POST, if there is a form). The Java function for the application page is shown below.
In the above example, a UserInfo object is added to the Model map with user_info as the key value. When the web page is rendered on the server by the template engine (in this case FreeMarker), the values from the object are filled in where it is referenced in the page HTML.
The HTML web page is referred to as a template since data values dynamically replace the template markup when the page is rendered.
One of the first template engines was PHP, which dates to the early days of the Web.
In 1999 Sun Microsystems released Java Server Pages (JSP), which is a template engine for Java web applications. In 2006 the Java Server Pages Tag Library (JSTL) was released. The JSTL makes JSP easier to use and the resulting web pages are easier to understand.
In addition to JSP/JSTL, there have been a number of template engines released for the Java software ecosystem. These include Apache Velocity, FreeMarker,Thymeleaf and Pippo (which seems to have evolved from an earlier template engine named Pebble). Groovy Server Pages (GSP) are used for Grails/Groovy applications.
A web application may consist of a large number of web pages. For example, the nderground social network, built by Topstone Software, has over 35 web pages. Designing and developing these web pages represents a significant portion of the effort that went into building the web application. Choosing the template engine for web page implementation is a important investment in the software architecture.
A core requirement in evaluating a Java template engine was whether it is supported by the Spring framework, which Topstone Software uses to develop web applications. Three template engines, which are supported by Spring, have been evaluated.
The best way to evaluate a template engine (or any software development framework) is to use it in a real application. Each of the template engines was used in a version of the Cognito Demonstration application.
The Cognito demonstration application was developed to explore the AWS Cognito authentication service. The application includes ten web pages, where almost every page includes dynamic server side data.
The original version of the Cognito demonstration application uses JSP and JSTL templates in the web pages.
JSTL supports the <c:import … > tag which allows HTML fragements to be included in the page or page header.
The example below shows how conditional logic can be added for server side page generation. When a page is sent to the client, it will consists of static HTML, which has been dynamically generated on the server.
Thymeleaf is currently popular in the Spring community. Many articles on Spring use Thymeleaf in the example web pages. One of the best references on the Spring framework, Spring in Action, Fifth Edition, by Craig Walls, Manning Press, October 2018, also uses Thymeleaf.
Thymeleaf has a number of issues, some of which are stylistic.
Thymeleaf embeds the Thymeleaf markup in HTML tags, usually <div> or <span> tags. I don’t find this as clean and easy to read and write as JSP/JSTL or FreeMarker tags. An example showing Thymeleaf markup is shown below.
Thymeleaf has some issues that go beyond the stylistic.
When Thymeleaf encounters an error while processing Thymeleaf markup, it throws a Java exception. This exception does not contain any information (i.e., line and character number) about what caused the error. This can make finding and correcting a Thymeleaf markup error time consuming, slowing application development.
Another concern is that Thymeleaf could become an orphan open source project.
Although Thymeleaf is popular in the Spring community and Thymeleaf is currently supported by the Spring Tool Suite project builder, I noticed that Thymeleaf is not supported by Pivotal (the company that supports the Spring framework). Thymeleaf is supported by three GitHub committers and most of the GitHub commits are from two people. If these GitHub committers are not able or willing to support Thymeleaf, the project could become an orphan.
FreeMarker is supported by an Apache Software Foundation and has a huge user community, including page templates for several content management systems (see Who Uses FreeMarker). FreeMarker also has support for the Spring framework.
On a stylistic level, I prefer FreeMarker’s JSP/JSTL like tag structure. An example is shown below. Note that the expressions within the conditionals do not have to be quoted.
FreeMarker supports an include tag that can be used to include HTML sections in the page. An example is shown below.
FreeMarker is not without its quirks. I spent hours of frustrating experimentation before I could get images to load on the FreeMarker pages (see the Java configuration class cognitodemo.freemarker.config.AppConfig in the FreeMarker GitHub project).
Free marker also has a syntax that can take getting used to. In the example below the FreeMarker page references the String variable login_error. However, this FreeMaker markup will result in a FreeMarker parsing error.
FreeMarker requires you to use the FreeMarker operators for comparison to null and for string length. The null comparision operator is “??” The String length() function is not allowed. Instead the built-in FreeMarker length operator must be used: login_error?length. The correct FreeMarker markup is shown below:
Velocity is a vintage template engine and alternative to JSP/JSTL. Velocity has a large community and many features. From 2010 to 2017 there were no major Velocity releases and some people, including the Spring development team, concluded that the Velocity project was in hibernation.
In a Jira issue posting the Spring development group states that Velocity will not be a supported part of Spring, but that the Apache Velocity group is welcome to support Spring adapters for Velocity.
In 2017 Apache Velocity released version 2.0 of the template engine and in 2018 they released version 3.0 of the Velocity tools. So the Velocity project seems to be active.
References on Velocity and integrating Velocity with Spring include:
Although it appears that Velocity can be integrated with Spring, I am concerned that Velocity compatibility with Spring doesn’t seem to be a focus of either the Spring project or the Apache Velocity group. Given this concern and the fact that at some point exploration has to give way to application development, I decided not to develop a Velocity version of the Cognito demonstration application.
After investigating JSP/JSTL, Thymeleaf and FreeMarker, I have decided to use FreeMarker for my next Topstone Software web application.
A concern with JSP/JSTL is that not much has happened with the technology since 2008. Although there is an active open source community behind Java, it is not clear that this extends to JSP/JSTL. This makes the technology less attractive compared to FreeMarker, which has a huge user community and an active Apache project.
Thymeleaf has a small development group. Unless this group expands, I am concerned that Thymeleaf could become an orphan project. The fact that, currently, Thymeleaf does not provide useful error messages when it encounters a markup error can make finding problems time consuming. On a stylistic level, I don’t like the Thymeleaf markup as much as JSP/JSTL or FreeMarker.
FreeMarker is an Apache Foundation project with a large user community. When the FreeMarker processor encounters an error, it provides useful error messages. After using Groovy Server Pages and JSP/JSTL, the FreeMarker markup feels familiar.
One objection to the server side model-view-controller (MVC) paradigm that is used in the Cognito demonstration application is that the client side web page logic is integrated with the server side controllers. Changes to the web pages may result in changes to the controller code.
Following this architecture the client display layer is separated from the server code. The server code only has to be change if there is a requirement to display new data.
In this architecture, the application display on the client side could be completely changed without affecting the server.
For large organizations, moving away from the model-view-controller paradigm, where the controller is on the server, may be attractive. The client side and server side groups can work in parallel with less impact.
For a smaller organization or for rapid application development, developing a monolithic Spring MVC application will usually be faster and more flexible since the same developer(s) will be developing both the server side controller and the client side web pages.
After the application gains market traction, it may make sense to move toward an architecture that uses Spring on the server to implement the server API and a client side framework like AngularJS for client side display. However, adopting this approach too early is likely to increase development time when it is important to get the application in the hands of users as soon as possible.
The original version of this article was published on the Topstone Software Consulting web site.