Interoperability in Blockchain Networks
Crypto & MMA Enthusiast. #freshgraphics #topbitcoinbeliever 👻👽
It is through blockchain technology that modern cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin and Ethereum were established- technology that has been earmarked for future greatness.
However, the implementation of blockchain has faced numerous challenges over the years. Recurring problems amongst developers and those who seek to implement the technology include blockchain’s limited interoperability and scalability.
As blockchain technology grew beyond one of the early use cases such as cryptocurrency, the limitations of the platform became evident. These limitations prompted developers to work on solutions to the highlighted problems. Most platforms sought to address scalability first, which made the problem of interoperability even more glaring.
Blockchain platforms are developed for different functions. These functions determine the technological direction of the platform. Developers are required to make sound decisions when It comes to developing network architectures.
Fintech companies will opt for more secure platforms while gaming platforms may decide to major in scalability. These differences in system operations hinder interoperability between different blockchains. Further, even within the same industry, blockchain platforms may take different technological routes. For example, Bitcoin and Ethereum speak different technical languages. Though both use blockchain, Bitcoin cannot be spent on the Ethereum network.
The trade-offs made by blockchain developers make blockchain integration and interoperability more difficult. Streamlining of blockchain systems is therefore hindered, and adoption becomes a burden to mainstream industries.
For blockchain to become successful in the mainstream market, it has to function equal to or better than centralized networks. Thus, it must have specific technical attributes that have allowed centralized networks to thrive for so long.
Technically, blockchain needs to gravitate towards becoming more of a co-operating
OS than just an underlying protocol. Microsoft is a perfect example of the success that awaits blockchain should it to take this route. The company’s early success was primarily due to the direction initially decided upon in 1983 when they announced Windows
. By developing an operating system, they cemented their presence in the computer industry.
Windows allowed the execution of multiple applications on one underlying system. Developers would, therefore, build all their applications based on Windows. These applications would operate seamlessly through their shared connection via Windows OS.
What Are Some of the Options Available?
- Exchange of digital assets
- Exchange of data
Interoperability aims to encourage cross-chain communication
between networks that are blockchain-based but with different architectures. By enabling exchange of digital assets and data, cross-chain communication is achieved.
Interoperability would allow the exchange of assets originating from different blockchain platforms. As long as parties from the various technological divides can provide publicly verifiable signatures from their cooperating platforms, the exchange can be executed.
The exchange of data between different blockchains would allow operations executed on one blockchain to be performed in a separate blockchain. This would mean that smart contracts created in one blockchain can be triggered in a different technical platform as long as the blockchains have a universal code interpreter and verifier.
Exchange of data is inherently difficult with the current technical set up as most blockchains are unable to produce signatures that can be verified by other platforms. However, some developments will likely make interoperability possible shortly.
are like mini blockchains operating jointly with the main chain. The networks can include independent miner, independent consensus mechanism, and independent tokens, which are all connected via the main chain.
Diagram showing interoperability in blockchain via sidechains | Source: Author
The main chain acts as the link between all the sidechains.
For transactions initiated within the same network, the following are required for submission of proof and verification:
a. Merkle Tree
with branches that contain transaction details, including the root of the transaction.
b. A blockheader
confirmation to confirm block creation with the previous hash.
c. Proof that the block added has been confirmed by blocks within the sidechain/mainchain
A platform that has successfully employed the use of sidechains is Aelf
and Cosmos. The Aelf network architecture
comprises of a system of sidechains linked to one main chain which acts as the backbone of the entire platform. The sidechains are in two indices,
i. External sidechains
ii. Internal sidechains
Their architecture utilizes one chain, one type of contract rule which ensures that each chain deals with only a particular set of transactions. Platforms may decide to implement one chain to any contract type rule which could still work. However, the specialization created in Aelf’s case is unique to their network goals.
A Merkle tree set up is also seen in the Aelf network architecture. The Merkle tree makes it possible for sidechains to have their own “sidechains” under one network. The system resembles a tree with branches that have branches.
A Merkle tree set up as used by Aelf | Source: AltNews.nu
Aelf also contains a blockheader which records the Merkle Tree root, an essential step in the operation of sidechain indices in the overall Aelf network.
2. Notary schemes
These achieve cross-chain communication through sidechains, which enables them to attain cross-chain data and asset transfer. In a cross-chain setup, notary schemes would thrive. Notary schemes
can use a trusted distributed node to attest to one chain the events that took place in another chain. The notaries agree through a select consensus mechanism and then issue a signature that can be used to finalize the transaction being executed.
Implementing notary schemes is one of the simplest ways of achieving cross-chain interoperability. However, it must be noted that the network will place its trust in the trusted distributed nodes which may be limited by social scalability
The process of cross-chain communication and validation is crucial in interoperability.
Relays allow chains to verify events that have taken place in other chains. Unlike notary schemes, relays work on a chain-to-chain basis without the need for trusted distributed nodes. Relays work in such a manner that a contract on one chain is a client of sorts on another chain. The relevance of trusted distributed nodes is eliminated by making each chain understand the changes that take place in their respective chains.
For example, a smart contract executed in chain A can be read comfortably by a relay in chain B. The best example of relay used in blockchain is BTC relay
. The BTC relay on Ethereum can read the Bitcoin chain.
Relay architectures work best with chains that bear specific characteristics which include fast consensus finality and flexible multisig capability.
The relay as applied by Polkadot | Source: Medium
The Best Blockchains Allow for Universal Operability
The options developers have for interoperability all appear to be forms of sidechains and, from a broader perspective, they likely are. Therefore, having all-rounded sidechain architecture would likely lead to a better performing platform in terms of interoperability.
The future of blockchain is interoperability, and with platforms heading in the right direction, it seems that that future is bright.
Disclaimer: Please only take this information as my OWN opinion and should not be regarded as financial advice in any situation. Please remember to DYOR before making any decisions.
♂️ Hi, my name’s Sal.
If you found this article useful and would like to view my other work please be sure to clap and follow me on Medium and LinkedIn!😎
Subscribe to get your daily round-up of top tech stories!