“Give me six hours to chop down a tree and I will spend the first four sharpening the ax.”- Not actually Abraham Lincoln
This quote has almost become cliché but I constantly see that, by and large, its message is being ignored.
I am laying out a framework to aid decisions around whether training is worth it and at exactly what point is it worth it.
In Stephen Covey’s 7 Habits of Highly Effective People the final habit is “Sharpen the Saw”. While this concept’s scope is larger than what I am describing, it lays out the importance of ways to keep yourself sharp and the advantages of doing so.
It is my intent to make continuous learning and improvement an objectively correct choice rather than a subjectively ambiguous choice.
Context: these examples and questions are taken from personal experience and study largely in the startup domain and more specifically coding, but they apply to any field that can be measured.
I want to acknowledge that in every example I gave the “improvement” was estimated or guessed.
Improvement can never be that precise, but you can measure.
You can find a metric that relates to your performance and you can measure its change over time. If you are managing a team, you can do a controlled study (i.e. splitting 30 people into two groups of 15, half of which go to a conference). In order to have value in the calculator (see below) you either need to measure the results or acknowledge that other variables can interfere with results.
I created a calculator to make it easy to see when something pays off. It assumes 8 hours a day.
The first example above, charted:
In this example, it takes 27.5 days before your invested time is paid off. Every day after you profit. Theoretically, forever.
“I should just spend all my time learning.” That’s what school was for. Now, you likely have deadlines. In the example above, if you had 15 days to accomplish a project that relied on the course that took 27.5 before you broke even and crossed that line, it wouldn’t have worked.
Does what you’re improving make a difference?
If I can increase my typing speed from 120 WPM to 150 WPM (25% improvement!) with a 50-hour course, it will take me 31 days to “payoff” my invested time. I would argue that, except in very rare cases, this will not produce an important change.
The Pareto principle amplifies this rule drastically. Taking one of the above scenarios, Google Adwords, consider the following:
The framework is as follows:
This is my framework for deciding what workshops employees should attend when I need to delegate a task, or how much time I need to spend to give new tools or experiments a “real shot”.
I hope it is useful for you.
If you enjoyed this article and found it useful, please let me know and clap or write comments below! I’m happy to expound further on any questions you may have.
Kerry Jones is a CTO, Founder, and was recently awarded the Forbes 30 Under 30 achievement. I am passionate about everything startup from a culture-first environment to the pros and cons of tech stacks and paradigms. Connect with me on LinkedIn or say hi on Twitter.