DOE vs. Github: Plaintiffs' Claims and Common Grievances
by Legal PDFSeptember 1st, 2023
Too Long; Didn't Read
The lawsuit highlights the typicality of claims among Plaintiffs and Class members who published code under a License, later utilized by Copilot. Allegations center around shared damages resulting from Defendants' alleged wrongful actions, emphasizing the collective nature of the relief sought.
DOE vs. Github (amended complaint) Court Filing (Redacted), June 8, 2023 is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This is part 9 of 38.
VI. CLASS ALLEGATIONS
C. Typicality
40. Plaintiffs’ claims are typical of the claims of their fellow Class members because Plaintiffs and Class members all own code published under a License. Plaintiffs and the Class published work subject to a License to GitHub later used by Copilot. Plaintiffs and absent Class members were damaged by this and other wrongful conduct of Defendants as alleged herein. Damages and the other relief sought herein is common to all members of the Class.
Continue Reading Here.
About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.
This court case 4:22-cv-06823-JST retrieved on August 26, 2023, from Storage Courtlistener is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction.
L O A D I N G
. . . comments & more!
. . . comments & more!
