Tongo

By Brent Rose All great podcasts have to start somewhere. Many of the behemoths of today began in someone’s closet and with just a handful of friends for listeners. So, what changes that? How does a little, independent podcast spread, ultimately growing to reach an audience of millions? Today we unpack just such a story, and who knows, maybe you’ll find a nugget of wisdom that sends your own project into the stratosphere. The podcast currently averages 50,000 listeners per episode and has reached millions over its lifetime, but it certainly wasn’t born into these kinds of numbers. bills itself as “a history of why we resist new things.” It’s about nay-sayers throughout history who opposed innovation, and, in retrospect, look pretty silly now. We’re talking about people who were vehemently opposed to horrifying abominations like… the umbrella, elevators, bicycles, refrigerators, and yes, even teddy bears and birthdays. The idea is to look at why these things seemed so scary when they were new, and, now that we know they’re not so scary, perhaps calm down about the innovations we’re freaking out about today. The podcast currently averages 50,000 listeners per episode and has reached millions over its lifetime, but it certainly wasn’t born into these kinds of numbers. Pessimists Archive Jason Feifer writes, produces, and hosts the Pessimists Archive podcast. When not working on the podcast, he does his “day job” as editor-in-chief of Entrepreneur Magazine, and before that he was an editor for Fast Company. (Disclosure: I wrote a couple articles for Jason in his FastCo days, and I currently do voiceovers for the Pessimists Archive podcast purely because I enjoy it.) Photo provided by Feifer Pessimists Archive began in 2015 as a Twitter feed run by a British web designer named Louis Anslow. It existed for much the same purpose that the podcast does. Anslow would dig up historical apoplexies about things that now seem commonplace, much to the delight of modern audiences. The feed first came onto Feifer’s radar a year later. For years, he had been interested in the idea of repetitive fears and had been writing about it for Fast Company, so the Twitter feed felt like something he might have thought up. Feifer reached out to Anslow, said he loved his work, and wondered if he might be interested in collaborating. Anslow did some research into Feifer, saw some videos he’d produced, and asked if he would like to make a podcast together. Feifer, who had already been yearning to get into podcasting, said yes, and the rest is history. Well, sort of. “We had no idea what we were doing,” Feifer tells me. “Or whether or not it was going to resonate, or whether it was a project we even wanted to continue on. The first episode took three months to make. I mean, I had to get a microphone and teach myself audio editing.” They had a suspicion that there was an audience who would be hungry for the podcast, though, because the Twitter account already had about 20,000 followers, and some of them were big names in tech. When Feifer and Anslow did finally put the first episode out in September of 2016, it got to 5,000 listens fairly quickly. “We had heard that that was a big marker of success for podcasts,” Feifer said. “And we were like, ‘Oh, well, if we hit that on the first one, then I guess maybe it’s worth doing more of them.” To get to the next level, though, the two hosts would have to completely change the way their show was made. After a handful of episodes, it was becoming clear that their styles of working weren’t particularly compatible. Episodes were still taking far too long to make, and sending bits and pieces of each episode back and forth was not only frustrating both of them, it was making it tougher to put the show together in a cohesive way. Eventually, the two agreed that they should just focus on their strengths. Feifer would produce the podcast and Anslow would continue to dig through archives to provide research and run the still-popular Twitter feed. These kinds of internal restructurings are frequently make-or-break moments for podcasts. “It was stressful,” Feifer says. “But I think that you have to constantly be revising your process and just have open communication about that.” Fortunately, they both emerged unscathed, and the podcast became stronger for it. The podcast grew in the first year, but because episodes were coming out three months apart, that growth wasn’t exactly linear or easy to track. “One day we would see a spike,” Feifer says. “Like suddenly there was a thousand people who listened to it all one day, which was a huge number back in the early days. And we were like, ‘What is that? How did that happen?’ We’d scramble around, and the answer was something like ‘we were referenced on some random other podcasts.’ Somebody said our name. That’s not searchable so it’s really hard to figure out what that moment was.” The big breakthrough moment for growth, though, was when they won a grant from the Charles Koch Foundation. Feifer was able to hire someone to edit the audio, which would usually take him at least 10 hours an episode. He could now walk into a studio to record the voice-over rather than mucking around with his own equipment. Because of that, they were finally able to put episodes out every month. Notably, he now also had a bit of a marketing budget, which meant he could spend some money on ads, and the returns were massive. The podcast went from a total of less than 200,000 listens across everything to over 1 million in that year alone. “I started to run these little experiments where I would pay for ads on certain podcasts and some would hit really well and just drive a ton of traffic, and then some would do nothing,” Feifer told me. “And the podcasts that I was buying on were like the same size. So, what was happening? Well, what was happening is I was learning about my audience. I was discovering that ads on tech podcasts, for example, do really well, but ads on history podcasts don’t really do well. And that made me start to think of things like, ‘I always thought about this as a history show, but maybe it’s not a history show.’ Or ‘maybe I should stop talking about it like a history show because my audience isn’t history people.’” Overall, though, Feifer isn’t really into checking numbers. He comes from print magazines where you never get numbers. “So, I’ve never been acclimated to having numbers, and I just kind of hate numbers.” Instead he feels that you should focus on making the best product that you can and engaging directly with the people who consume it. As for whether there has been a single tipping point for the show, he’s not exactly sure. “I mean, the thing about tipping moments is [that] a tipping moment also means that success is somehow defined,” he says, “and I don’t know what success looks like yet for the show” But he did note that the past year or so has had a number of smaller tipping points, such as the sheer number of very high-profile people (including entrepreneur Marc Andreessen and psychologist and author Steven Pinker) liking and talking about the show completely on their own. He was also featured on both and , which sent their numbers skyrocketing for a month. Radiolab Reason Magazine’s podcast Thanks to a new budget via the Koch Foundation grant , the hosts are planning to hire a consulting firm that specializes in audience development. There’s only so much you can learn about your audience from watching who is following you on Twitter and anecdotally collecting those who are engaging with you, Feifer says. This consulting firm will be able to directly survey the podcast’s audience, giving thema more definitive understanding of why followers of the show like it so much. This is exciting from an audience-building perspective, but Feifer also sees how it could turn into a trap of preaching to the choir. For example, one of the things they already know about the show is that it’s popular with fans of technology, and also with libertarians.He says libertarians tend to buy in on the concept from the get-go because they are very pro-innovation, and they see Pessimists Archive as a sort of pushback against the forces that limit innovation.  “It’s not how I thought of it, but I get it,” Feifer told me. “But I don’t want to give into that and make this a show that’s just for libertarians, because then it’s not impacting anybody. Right? Then it’s just giving a set of people who like this what they want, and what I want to do is—I want to challenge people, and I want people to say, ‘Oh, this changed the way that I think.’ And I am seeing people say that on social media. That’s extremely gratifying,” he says. “So, I don’t want to pivot too hard into my audience, but I do think that it’s important to understand who your audience is so that you can grow, and so that maybe you can figure out who adjacent audiences are so that you could, you could expand it to there.” Feifer is careful to note, though, that he does encourage audience members to reach out with their ideas, not only because he’s interested in how people respond to the show, but because if they have valid points then he wants to build them in. Over the last few years, he has incorporated some ideas for topics as well as for the overarching tone of the series, and the show has been made better for it. Feifer wasn’t shy about admitting that his goals for Pessimists Archive aren’t necessarily confined to the worlds of podcasting and Twitter: “You know, to me, the ultimate tipping point would be if I could do this as a full-time job, or if it could lead to some kind of massive new thing like a TV show, or I’ve been exploring a book on the subject, but haven’t done it yet.I don’t know what the show’s starring role is yet, but I’m very encouraged that every time we release an episode, I get a better sense of that.” Article from Chicago Examiner Vol. 9 no. 17 He sees Pessimists Archive almost as the beginning of a thought movement, and as a potent argument for something that’s critical now, which is understanding change and, hopefully, being a force for positive change. Whether that manifests through TV, or books, or partnering with an organization focused on innovation, almost doesn’t matter, as long as the product continues to grow and become more influential. Or, as Feifer himself put it, “I’m constantly curious and exploring ways in which it can be as much as it can possibly be.” At this point, none of those lofty goals feel unattainable. Through learning about his listeners and building his understanding of what it is about his show that hooks people, Feifer has managed to draw many more people in. His audience is now a platform he can stand on, build from, and continue to reach for those higher aspirations. It’s amazing what a little research can do. Previously published at Timber.fm

Pessimists Archive: The Ultimate Podcast for Techno-Liberitarians

Telegram Open Network Architecture Explained by A Network Validator [Deep Dive]

Zug, Switzerland, October 4th, 2023/Chainwire/-- MEXC Ventures, a subsidiary of MEXC’s global cryptocurrency exchange MEXC, has announced a significant investment in , the largest layer-1 investment the firm has ever made. This investment works alongside a strategic partnership with The Open Network (TON) Foundation. This symbiotic partnership represents the shared vision of both companies in promoting global Web3 accessibility by lowering the barriers to entry. The Open Network MEXC Ventures’ investment, the highest amount it has committed to any layer-one blockchain, is just one part of MEXC’s broader efforts to bolster the growth of TON’s ecosystem. MEXC Ventures’ investment support of TON-based projects, such as Megaton Finance, TONPlay, Fanzee, and Sonet, is already well underway, and the venture firm plans to continue funding TON-based mini apps and projects. MEXC’s exchange will also provide marketing services and promotion for the TON-based projects they list on their platform. To further empower a commitment to The Open Network, MEXC exchange will also introduce 0% trading fees for Toncoin and plan to provide a TON collateral lending service in the near future. TON Foundation acts as a bridge, connecting nearly 800 million monthly active Telegram users to Web3 and true asset ownership. The team is dedicated to transforming TON into an accessible platform as a simple gateway to Web3, enabling more users to acquire cryptocurrency assets swiftly and conveniently. With the support of MEXC Ventures, TON Foundation’s goal is to catalyze the creation of a Web3 ecosystem within the Telegram app– transforming the social messenger platform into a massive traffic entry point for easy access to crypto assets. “By working with MEXC, we will bring global access to the decentralized Web3 ecosystem in Telegram," said Justin Hyun, Director of Growth at TON Foundation. "Our Foundation is committed to promoting a user-centric experience for The Open Network community. MEXC’s support significantly strengthens our potential to build new tools and services for developers and applications that make crypto feel indistinguishable from social media for users.” TON’s native cryptocurrency, Toncoin, is used for executing smart contracts, utilizing decentralized applications (dApps), and participating in governance on TON blockchain. Additionally, a portion of Toncoin has been allocated to the TON Foundation to encourage and support the development of the ecosystem. To date, the TON ecosystem boasts a multitude of applications, spanning wallets, DeFi protocols, decentralized exchanges (DEXs), games, NFTs, cross-chain bridges, and social, giving it a well-established foundational infrastructure. “This investment underlines MEXC's strong conviction in TON blockchain in building a Web3 super-app ecosystem on Telegram,” said Steve Yun, President of TON Foundation. “We are confident that the TON ecosystem and MEXC will grow together as we build for the next market cycle of bull runs.” About MEXC MEXC is a centralized cryptocurrency exchange that employs high-performance matching technology and has consistently maintained a leading position in the field of futures trading in the cryptocurrency industry. With the lowest trading fees in the market, a professional team providing industry-leading service responses around the clock, and a seamless trading experience, MEXC is highly regarded by users in the industry, boasting over 10 million users in over 170 countries worldwide. Since its inception, MEXC has always adhered to the value of "Users First". Customer satisfaction has always been the guiding criterion. The fundamental reason for MEXC's wide acclaim in service is its commitment to achieving customer satisfaction. . To sign up, register on . MEXC Official Website MEXC About MEXC Ventures is a comprehensive fund under MEXC Group, committed to empowering innovations of the cryptocurrency field, via strategic investment, M&A, FOF, and project incubation. Mexc Ventures upholds the concept of "discovering opportunities and growing together" by fully sharing fund resources and providing solid support for projects. The team spans across the US, Singapore, HK, and other regions of the world, with $100m+ AUM and 300+ portfolio investments. MEXC Ventures About TON Foundation: (TON Foundation) is a non-profit organization founded in Switzerland in 2023. TON Foundation is 100% funded by the community, acting in the community's interests, and supports initiatives aligned with The Open Network’s mission. Learn more at . The Open Network Foundation https://ton.foundation About The Open Network (TON): (TON) is putting crypto in every pocket. By building a Web3 ecosystem in Telegram Messenger, TON is giving billions of people the opportunity to own their digital identity, data, and assets. See more at . The Open Network https://ton.org/ Contact TON Foundation ton@theagencypartnership.com This story was distributed as a release by Chainwire under HackerNoon’s Brand As An Author Program. Learn more about the program . here

MEXC Ventures Invests in Toncoin; Enters Strategic partnership with TON Foundation

Software debugging can often feel like a never-ending maze. Just when you think you're on the right track, you hit a dead-end. But, by employing the age-old technique of the process of elimination and using the analogy of the 'Tong Motion,' we can navigate this maze more effectively. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K4FRRG4pnEM&embedable=true As a side note, if you like the content of this and the other posts in this series, check out my that covers this subject. If you have friends who are learning to code, I'd appreciate a reference to my . If you want to get back to Java after a while, check out my . Debugging book Java Basics book Java 8 to 21 book Understanding the Process of Elimination in Debugging The Basics The process of elimination in is straightforward in principle: continuously rule out non-problematic components until the root cause reveals itself. This can be achieved either by commenting out lines of code or using debugging techniques, such as the 'force return,’ which bypasses specific code paths. debugging Using External Tools For front-end issues, replicating the problem using tools like Curl or Postman is valuable. It helps us determine if the bug is within the front-end code or elsewhere. This way, we can quickly narrow our focus, not merely addressing the symptoms but locating the actual bug. The Power of Unit Tests in Debugging Unit tests are our best allies when it comes to debugging. By focusing on isolated units, they hone in on potential problem areas. Benefits of Mocking Frameworks Mocking frameworks like Mockito come in handy as they can simulate large parts of the application. This way, we can drill down on the exact problem, circumventing potential disturbances. Moreover, using mocks can prevent regression and make our test cases cleaner. However, while there are best practices regarding the a specific problem, it's more pragmatic to mock as much as necessary to distill the problem to its essence. extent of mocking when debugging The Challenges with Flaky Issues The elimination technique is less straightforward with flaky issues - those bugs that appear irregularly or whose behavior changes as code is eliminated. The key strategy here is to . In simpler terms, if removing a certain block doesn't cause the problem to appear, it doesn't automatically indict that block. The absence could be due to the bug's unpredictable nature. Hence, it's crucial only to trust instances where the problem consistently reproduces. focus on the negatives The Concept of the 'Tong Motion' Think of tongs. They grasp from both sides. Similarly, almost all software has at least two primary interfaces or points of input/output. For instance: : Web UI on one side and the database on the other. Enterprise Web Apps : User space app on one end and computer hardware on the other. Operating System Kernel : The joystick and screen API on one side and the game database on the other. Video Games Applying the Tong Motion to Debugging Using the example of an enterprise web app: : Begin by using tools like Curl or Postman to eliminate front-end issues. Mocking the Web Tier : Replace the actual database with mock data. Mocking the Database : If the problem persists, move to testing the presentation tier directly, thereby eliminating the database from the equation. Narrowing Down Further : Invoke the business method directly and mock its dependencies. This way, you are narrowing down on the actual method causing the issue while excluding the rest of the application. Digging Deeper One common pitfall is neglecting one prong of the tongs or misplacing the other. It's crucial to ensure both sides are appropriately positioned; otherwise, it might skew the results. If stuck, consider investigating from the opposite side and then revert when needed. An Illustrative Case: Debugging a Server Performance Issue In a real-world scenario, while tackling a server performance issue, I employed the 'Tong Motion' technique. By replacing web calls with curl requests, I shifted focus to the problematic area. At the same time, I enhanced database logging to monitor its output as problematic SQL was replicated through curl. This dual-sided approach helped unearth a bug in the Object Relational Mapping layer. This concrete example comprises of the following stages: The tongs start by mocking the web tier with curl or postman. This eliminates front-end-related issues. The other side of the tong motion replaces the database with mock data. If the issue can be reproduced, we can further squeeze the tongs by invoking the presentation tier method directly in a test case. We can then eliminate the database entirely from the equation by mocking it in a test case. Finally, we can invoke the business method directly, eliminating the presentation tier aspect. We can mock its dependencies, which means we narrow down on a specific method that’s at fault while eliminating the rest of the application. Wrapping Up . However, with the right techniques, like the process of elimination and the 'Tong Motion' approach, it becomes a more manageable task. Always remember to tackle issues methodically and from all angles to find and fix the root cause effectively. Debugging can be a daunting process Abstract: Once we press the merge button, that code is no longer our responsibility. If it performs sub-optimally or has a bug, it is now the problem of the DevOps team, the SRE, etc. Unfortunately, those teams work with a different toolset. If my code uses up too much RAM, they will increase RAM. If the code runs slower, it will increase CPU. If the code crashes, they will increase concurrent instances. If none of that helps, . A lot of these problems are visible before they become a disastrous middle-of-the-night call. Yes. DevOps should control production, but the information they gather from production is useful for all of us. they will call you up at 2 a.m Also published . here

Get the Bugs Out of Your Code Using the Tong Motion Approach

: Vested Interest Disclosure The author's an independent contributor, and while HackerNoon has reviewed the story for quality, the claims hereon belong to the author. #DYOR TONcoin Fund launches $250M Ecosystem Fund with support from leading exchanges The is the very first ecosystem fund dedicated specifically to assist founders developing on The Open Network. Huobi Incubator, Kucoin Ventures, MEXC Pioneer Fund, 3Commas Capital, Orbs, TON Miners, and Kilo Fund have created a collaborative initial pledge of up to $250M to endorse the fund. The TON Foundation will sponsor the ecosystem fund and designate initiatives with grants. TONcoin Fund The Open Network is a decentralized layer-1 proof-of-stake blockchain that works with Telegram and was created with billions of customers in mind. It touts super-fast transactions, cheap costs, user-friendly apps, and is eco-friendly. Benjamin Rameau, the Managing Partner of TONcoin Fund, said: The Open Network offers tremendous opportunities to achieve mass adoption of blockchain technology. TON may become the first blockchain network accessible to millions of users thanks to the Telegram integration efforts by the community via in-app bots as well as native interface proposals. TONcoin Fund is very excited to support the first decentralized exchanges, stable coins, NFT projects and other dApps building on TON. The TON Foundation would track the ecosystem's growth and development. The Foundation's Incubation Partners programme recognises high-quality teams and assists in a decentralised way for the growth of the ecosystem. To facilitate the acceptance and growth of major apps, these Incubation Partners constitute ecosystem funds. The TON blockchain will be used to fund startups and developers via the TONcoin Fund. Incubation, investments, grants, hackathons, and the provision of instructional resources for the community are all potential methods of achieving this goal. For this reason, the TONcoin Fund aspires to be a part of the TON blockchain's success thanks to its in-house experience in web3 design and venture capital investment. In addition, portfolio companies will benefit from backing from the venture arms of some of the world's top crypto exchanges, increasing their user reach and connecting them with sector visionaries. Don’t forget to like and share the story!

TONcoin Fund launches $250M Ecosystem Fund to support development on the Open Network

Efficient Neural Network Approaches for Conditional Optimal Transport: Discussion and Reference

How To Resolve Conflicts With Your Superiors At Work

Q1 2024 brought some fascinating shifts in the market, with certain sectors outperforming others. Here's a rundown of the most profitable crypto narratives that dominated the first quarter of 2024, along with their implications. And if you run a crypto/DeFi/NFT project and you need a piece of advice on marketing and community building, you can [message me](mailto: serge@x10.agency) directly. Here is a Q1 2024 breakdown: Memecoins: The Unexpected Champions Who would have thought that would take the crypto world by storm in Q1 2024? With an astonishing average return of 1,312.6% across the top 10 memecoins by market cap, these playful tokens left other narratives in the dust. memecoins The standout performers were BRETT, which skyrocketed by 7,727.6%, and the viral sensation dogwifhat (WIF), which surged an impressive 2,721.2%. Newcomers like BOOK OF MEME (BOME), cat in a dogs world (MEW), and Dogecoin20 (DOGE20) also gained significant traction, highlighting the explosive growth of the meme coin sector. This meteoric rise in memecoins outpaced the next best-performing crypto narrative, Real World Assets (RWA), by 4.6 times. Other narratives like AI, DeFi, and DePIN also saw moderate to strong gains, but none could match the sheer dominance of memecoins in Q1 2024. The surge in meme coin popularity attracted the attention of influential figures like Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin, who sees the potential for these playful projects to contribute positively to the ecosystem and global community. However, the inherent volatility of memecoins remains a significant concern, as highlighted by a recent Solana meme coin pre-sale debacle. Nonetheless, the Q1 2024 performance of memecoins has been nothing short of remarkable, solidifying their status as the most profitable crypto narrative of the quarter. Memecoins demonstrate the power of community and virality in the crypto market. While they may be volatile and risky, their potential for massive returns has captured the attention of investors. Implications: Real-World Assets (RWAs): Solid Returns Coming in second place behind the meteoric rise of memecoins, generated an average return of 285.6% in Q1 2024. Real World Assets (RWAs) Standout Performers - MANTRA (OM): Surged 1,074.4%, solidifying its position as a leading RWA token. - TokenFi (TOKEN): Gained 419.7%, demonstrating the growing investor appetite for RWA-based crypto assets. Outlier Performance However, not all RWA tokens shared in the overall sector's success. XDC Network (XDC) bucked the trend, declining by 15.6% during the quarter. RWAs continue to show promise as they bridge the gap between traditional finance and the crypto world. Their strong performance indicates that investors are increasingly interested in tokens backed by real-world assets. However, This outlier performance serves as a reminder that, even within the promising RWA narrative, individual token performance can vary significantly based on factors such as project fundamentals, market conditions, and investor sentiment. Implications: AI Narrative: Triple-Digit Triumphs The secured the third-best performing crypto theme in Q1 2024, with an average gain of 222.0%. AI narrative Top AI Crypto Performers AIOZ Network (AIOZ): Soared by an impressive 480.2%, cementing its position as a leading AI-focused crypto project. Fetch.ai (FET): Climbed 378.3%, demonstrating the growing investor appetite for AI-powered blockchain solutions. The AI narrative's success highlights the growing importance of artificial intelligence in various industries. As AI continues to transform businesses and create new opportunities, the demand for AI-related cryptocurrencies is likely to increase. Implications: DeFi and DePIN: Moderate but Steady DeFi Narrative The achieved moderate returns of 98.9% in Q1 2024. This performance was partly driven by the Uniswap (UNI) fee switch proposal, which generated renewed investor interest in the DeFi sector. DeFi narrative DePIN Narrative The started the quarter in the red but finished strong with 81.0% gains. This category was led by the standout performances of: DePIN (Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Networks) narrative • Arweave (AR): A leading DePIN project that saw significant price appreciation. Livepeer (LPT): Another DePIN token that delivered strong returns during the quarter. Theta Network (THETA): A DePIN project that also contributed to the overall gains in this narrative. DeFi and DePIN show that decentralized finance and infrastructure solutions are here to stay. Despite facing regulatory challenges and market volatility, these sectors continue to grow and attract investors. Implications: Layer 1, Gaming, and Layer 2: Room for Improvement The Layer 1 (L1) narrative returned 70.0%, with Toncoin (TON) and Bitcoin Cash (BCH) as the top performers. saw respectable gains of 64.4%, while Layer 2 (L2) solutions lagged behind at 39.5%. Stacks (STX) and Mantle (MNT) were the strongest contenders in this category. GameFi While L1, gaming, and L2 solutions didn't perform as well as other narratives in Q1 2024, they still offer significant potential. Improvements in scalability, interoperability, and user experience could help these sectors catch up and thrive in the future. Implications: To draw a conclusion, the first quarter of 2024 was all about the memecoin revolution, with RWAs, AI, and DeFi also making significant strides. The comparatively lower performance of L2s and GameFi serves as a reminder of the challenges in capturing investor attention in the fast-paced and unpredictable crypto market. P.S. Check out my previous articles on AI at HackerNoon: NFT Market Trends In 2024 Meme Coin Marketing: The Ultimate Breakdown Why Everyone's Talking About Blast: The DeFi & Airdrop How To L aunch an NFT Project in 2024 AI Crypto Coins: When the Power of AI Meets the Blockchain DeFi Community Building: A Step-by-Step Guide for Crypto Startups

TONGO

gettongo.com

-- employees

Since n.d.

COMPANY RANKING

TONGO

EVERGREEN INDEX #10145

Representing this company? Click here to claim and customize this page!

Tongo WIKI

Apply to get your Tech Company News Page live on HackerNoon.com today!

TONGO

gettongo.com

-- employees

Since n.d.

COMPANY RANKING

TONGO

EVERGREEN INDEX #10145

RELATED COMPANIESRANK

STORIES ABOUT TONGO

Representing this company? Click here to claim and customize this page!

Tongo WIKI

Apply to get your Tech Company News Page live on HackerNoon.com today!