RxPost

When you repost stories on HackerNoon, we offer canonical linking for individuals looking to grow their personal sites. All you need to do is add the link to the original story in this box in your story settings: Canonical Linking Rules 4.c.i. - Canonical Links to Company Domain Canonical links to company domain must come from company account If the original source of the story lives on a company’s domain (ex: ), that company needs to repost the story from a branded Google account in order to get a canonical link. https://ai.googleblog.com/ The only exception to the rule above is if company founders/executives have marketing strategies around building a personal brand to promote their company. In that case, the founder or executive must get approval from the HackerNoon team to publish under their personal HN profile instead of one owned by the company. 4.c.ii. - No Canonical Links to Blog Networks or Social Networks We do not allow canonical links to blog networks or social networks (ex: wordpress.com, reddit.com, linkedin.com, medium.com). The point of our canonical links is to help the writer’s domain or the company’s domain grow. When you host your blog on a subdomain owned by another company, you are powering their domain and their brand, not yours. canonical links to david.com are ok! Canonical links to david.wordpress.com are not allowed. Put simply: Editing Protocol Index: Editing Protocol Overview Second Human Rule Verified Writers Time to Review Standards of Quality Originality Score 6 Ws Score Objectivity in ranked listicles Unranked listicles Actionable advice Red Flags Subject Matter Subject matter saturation Plagiarism Sources and Citations Formatting is bad or broken Grammar level: gibberish Story is Too Short Backlink Rules & Guidelines Backlink Limits Backlink quality and diversity Diversity of sources Internal linking Changing links Reposting and Canonical Linking Canonical links to company domain Canonical links to blog networks or social networks

Reposting and Canonical Linking

Reenvío y enlace canónico

Repostage et lien canonique

रीपोस्टिंग और कैननिकल लिंकिंग

再投稿と正規リンク

Repostagem e link canônico

Đăng lại và liên kết Canonical

重新发布和规范链接

For most accounts growth is good — more followers are better than fewer followers. More followers allow you to reach more people which helps you grow your brand, sell more products or achieve any other goal that is depended on reach. This is obvious. The less obvious part is how you go about growing. Instagram Do you use hashtags, do you only make posts within a very specific time window, do you try the latest trick you heard that will help you be in favor of the algorithm. What do you do?! While the strategies above and countless others may have merit, I am just going to walk you through one strategy that absolutely works. I’ll go over what it is, why it works, examples of it working and how to execute on the strategy. The growth is dead simple — it is to . These are tweets, which can be just text, an image, or video that have performed well on Twitter, which you then screenshot and repost to your Instagram (best practice is to tag the person who made the tweet in the post — almost all of them also have Instagram accounts). For this to work best, it is important that the viral tweet is relatable to your audience and there are two kinds of relatable tweets. hack repost viral, relatable tweets to your Instagram The first is a tweet that is relatable to a niche audience — the tweet will likely have anywhere from a and will only be appropriate to repost if your account also touches on the niche that the tweet is about. For example, if the tweet is related to veganism, your account should also be somehow related to veganism. The second kind of relatable tweet is the type that transcends categories and is relatable to most people. A tweet like this will likely have and should be paired with a comment/caption that contextualizes the post to your followers. So long as you are able to contextualize the post most accounts can repost tweets like this. few hundred to a few thousand likes >50,000 likes Reposting viral, relatable tweets to Instagram is an effective growth strategy because it is highly engaging content. The more engaging your content is the greater your reach will be and . There are a few reasons why tweets make for highly engaging content, but the short answer is that it is already validated content — it performed well on Twitter so it will also perform well on Instagram. You can find a . reach is the name of the game in growth more in-depth answer here Reposting viral tweets is such an effective strategy that it has become a whole category of Instagram accounts, where that is essentially all they post. Some of the biggest accounts that do this are , , , and . That is not to say that this strategy only works for these type of accounts — it works for everyone. Your account could be related to , , , or any other topic. For further evidence, check out how many likes the linked posts of tweets got versus their other posts — the reposts of tweets almost always outperform. Fuckjerry Buzzfeed Kale Salad Girl With No Job veganism personal finance organization motivation Example of a vegan Instagram account reposting a tweet Hopefully, you are now convinced that reposting viral, relatable tweets is a great and simple way to grow your Instagram. Now that last thing you need to know is how to execute on this strategy. Ultimately all that is required is finding/creating a stockpile of these tweets that you’d like to repost. This is most commonly done using a combination of the following three methods: Browsing Instagram and Twitter for this kind of content Getting an intern to browse Instagram and Twitter for this kind of content Using a tool like that automatically finds and categorizes tweets like this (full disclosure, I am a founder of xZeitgeist) xZeitgeist.com Once you have done this you will always have highly engaging content ready to post at a moments notice. Regularly posting this type of content will go a long way in helping you consistently and organically grow your Instagram. If you end up using this strategy I would love to hear how it goes! You can always reach me on . Twitter I hope this helps and wish you all the best in growing on Instagram 🎉📈Jacob P.S. email for a discount on xZeitgeist 😉 jacob@xzeitgeist.com

Instagram Growth Hack: Repost Viral, Relatable Tweets

There is any number of reasons you might want to grow on . Perhaps you want to build your personal brand, maybe you want to command more money when negotiating influencer deals or just maybe you are the type of person that finds validation in a follower count… I’m not here to judge, I’m here to share a tip with you that will help you grow. Twitter My tip on how to grow on Twitter is dead simple, 100% legit (no buying followers or any nonsense like that) and very under-utilized. Are you ready for the tip? here it is: Quickly repost viral videos Quickly reposting viral videos will help you grow your followers because it is highly engaging content. The more engaging the content is the more likes and retweets it will get which thereby increases the overall reach. The more users you reach the more opportunity you have to convert people to loyal followers. To get the very best results you should try and do three things when reposting a viral video: . The faster you are able to the viral video the better results you will get. This is because the longer the video is out the more people will see the video and users are less likely to engage with the video the second time they see it. Speed repost . This means you have to do a little bit of work and use a tool like and then upload when you make the tweet (Twitter will attribute the original poster, so no worries there). Repost > Retweet twittervideodownloader.com Whether you are reposting the video or retweeting the video it is important that you add a little bit of text where you can add some context or commentary on the video. Add your own voice. Yes, it is that simple. Let’s go through three examples. Example 1 — Celebrity/Influencer: Here is a tear-jerking, heartwarming video that blew up on Twitter And here is James Corden reposting the video two days later Even though it was not reposted that quickly the amazing personal commentary helped it become one of his most liked tweets. Example 2 — Personal Brand: The original video is posted Then a week later (7 days!) it is reposted by and then it gets way more engagement than the original video and becomes his most liked tweet of the year (it probably helped that he tweeted in English). jason Example 3 — Brand This is StockTwits doing something a little different and posting a viral video . This strategy works best when you repost the video after it has been quite some time since the video has gone viral. Nonetheless, this tweet was StockTwits most liked tweet of 2018. from 2014 Hopefully, you are now convinced that posting quickly reposting viral videos is a great way to make engaging content and that engaging content will increase your reach and therefore followers. Now the question becomes: How do you find this content? There are three ways: With an intern With a tool like xZeitgeist.com An intern with a tool like ** (the best way) xZeitgeist.com This strategy works best for accounts that already have a small following but can be effective for accounts of all sizes. I hope this helps and wish you all the best in growing on Twitter 🎉📈 JacobP.S. email jacob@xzeitgeist.com for a discount 😉 *I am a founder of xZeitgeist

Organic Twitter Growth Hack: How to Repost Viral Videos

Hey hackers 👋 I’m founder of Fluently, and I want to share my journey of creating a tool which help non-native professionals improve their English speaking skills with AI. Think Grammarly, but for video conferences. How the Idea Came About I lived in the States for over a year where I improved my English to an advanced level. I consume almost all information, including books in English. But despite this, in the last 4 months of living in London while attending the Entrepreneur First accelerator, I noticed that sometimes people still asked me to repeat what I’ve said. I saw from their faces that they didn’t understand anything. That's hard to hide. The funniest situation happened when a guy from Latvia quietly told me: "you pronounce 'vague' as 'wagyu'." The first word means unclear or indistinct, while the second is Japanese beef 😅 In short, I once again felt the desire to improve my English. The option of "oh well, they'll understand anyway, I'm not local" doesn't suit me at all. However, going to tutors is difficult. Firstly, you need to allocate time for lessons. Secondly, good tutors are expensive. Thirdly, the amount of feedback after an hour-long lesson is not much for a week. The Solution: Fluently My background as an ML engineer got me thinking: What if AI could track and highlight my common mistakes, and assist me in correcting them? Like a virtual tutor that fits organically into my daily routine and takes my English to a new level. That’s how Fluently started. First of all, I decided to spend a week to see if anyone else was interested. So I put together a landing page where you can sign up for the waitlist, and on the site itself, I simply outlined the main values of the product. The site hasn’t changed yet. Then I showed this landing page to my friends with the approach "hey, look what I found" to see how they would react. Surprisingly, 2/3 showed interest in the app and signed up for the waitlist on the site. The rest either have good English skills or don’t care. Also I shared a short demo video of Fluently in my Telegram channel, and a few friends reposted it. As a result, more than 200 people joined the waitlist. That was a big sign for me to start building! What is Fluently now? Fluently is an Mac app designed to help non-native professionals improve their English by giving instant feedback after online calls, like those on Google Meet or Zoom. Imagine that you have a personal coach who offers tips right after each call. To try Fluently, download an app and follow these easy steps: Start the app: Fluently activates when you speak English during online meetings.
Get feedback: After each call, Fluently provides feedback tailored to your language challenges, pointing out mistakes and suggesting improvements.
Track progress: Over time, you can see where you’re improving and where you still need practice. Here is an example of the Fluently feedback: Some of Fluently key benefits and features: Real-life feedback: Helps fix mistakes from real calls, not just in classrooms.
Effortless learning: No extra time needed – just learn from your usual meetings.
English Level Assessment: Evaluates your English level and identifies your strongest and weakest areas.
AI Tutor: Allows for English practice even when you’re not on calls. The Tech Side Since the app is for MacOS, I decided to write the client in Swift. We could have looked at Electron, but native apps always feel better. And if we have to dive into something low-level, it will be faster to solve issues in Swift. Currently, the app detects the start of a call and begins analyzing the user's audio in small chunks, processing them on the server. Only the user's speech is analyzed, and the speech of the interlocutor is not even heard by the app (except in some cases of loud conversations without headphones). The backend is written in Python, and the ML models are on PyTorch. The server receives the audio and detects pronunciation errors, which are sent back to the app. I won’t go into the implementation details of the pipeline itself, as that’s a topic for a separate post. To simplify, everything is arranged as follows: the audio is recognized into text, the text is translated into phonemes, and a separate model checks how well they match the sounds spoken in the audio recording. Privacy: of course we don’t collect the recordings themselves, only keeping statistics on errors. Besides, we don’t need English speech with a strong accent. I can record that for hours myself 😅 Next Steps I’m continuously working to improve Fluently. First of all, we are building web and mobile apps. To significantly increase Fluently potential audience. And creating daily exercises like Duolingo, based on your most common mistakes. It’s about making learning fun and useful for  daily routine. Got questions or feedback? I’m here to hear from you! Hey hackers 👋 I’m founder of Fluently , and I want to share my journey of creating a tool which help non-native professionals improve their English speaking skills with AI. Think Grammarly, but for video conferences. Fluently How the Idea Came About How the Idea Came About I lived in the States for over a year where I improved my English to an advanced level. I consume almost all information, including books in English. But despite this, in the last 4 months of living in London while attending the Entrepreneur First accelerator, I noticed that sometimes people still asked me to repeat what I’ve said. I saw from their faces that they didn’t understand anything. That's hard to hide. The funniest situation happened when a guy from Latvia quietly told me: "you pronounce 'vague' as 'wagyu'." The first word means unclear or indistinct, while the second is Japanese beef 😅 In short, I once again felt the desire to improve my English. The option of "oh well, they'll understand anyway, I'm not local" doesn't suit me at all. However, going to tutors is difficult. Firstly, you need to allocate time for lessons. Secondly, good tutors are expensive. Thirdly, the amount of feedback after an hour-long lesson is not much for a week. The Solution: Fluently The Solution: Fluently My background as an ML engineer got me thinking: What if AI could track and highlight my common mistakes, and assist me in correcting them? Like a virtual tutor that fits organically into my daily routine and takes my English to a new level. That’s how Fluently started. First of all, I decided to spend a week to see if anyone else was interested. So I put together a landing page where you can sign up for the waitlist, and on the site itself, I simply outlined the main values of the product. The site hasn’t changed yet. Then I showed this landing page to my friends with the approach "hey, look what I found" to see how they would react. Surprisingly, 2/3 showed interest in the app and signed up for the waitlist on the site. The rest either have good English skills or don’t care. Also I shared a short demo video of Fluently in my Telegram channel, and a few friends reposted it. As a result, more than 200 people joined the waitlist. That was a big sign for me to start building! What is Fluently now? Fluently is an Mac app designed to help non-native professionals improve their English by giving instant feedback after online calls, like those on Google Meet or Zoom. Imagine that you have a personal coach who offers tips right after each call. To try Fluently, download an app and follow these easy steps: Start the app: Fluently activates when you speak English during online meetings. Get feedback: After each call, Fluently provides feedback tailored to your language challenges, pointing out mistakes and suggesting improvements. Track progress: Over time, you can see where you’re improving and where you still need practice. Start the app: Fluently activates when you speak English during online meetings. Get feedback: After each call, Fluently provides feedback tailored to your language challenges, pointing out mistakes and suggesting improvements. Track progress: Over time, you can see where you’re improving and where you still need practice. Here is an example of the Fluently feedback: Some of Fluently key benefits and features: Some of Fluently key benefits and features: Real-life feedback: Helps fix mistakes from real calls, not just in classrooms. Effortless learning: No extra time needed – just learn from your usual meetings. English Level Assessment: Evaluates your English level and identifies your strongest and weakest areas. AI Tutor: Allows for English practice even when you’re not on calls. Real-life feedback: Helps fix mistakes from real calls, not just in classrooms. Effortless learning: No extra time needed – just learn from your usual meetings. English Level Assessment: Evaluates your English level and identifies your strongest and weakest areas. AI Tutor: Allows for English practice even when you’re not on calls. The Tech Side The Tech Side Since the app is for MacOS, I decided to write the client in Swift. We could have looked at Electron, but native apps always feel better. And if we have to dive into something low-level, it will be faster to solve issues in Swift. Currently, the app detects the start of a call and begins analyzing the user's audio in small chunks, processing them on the server. Only the user's speech is analyzed, and the speech of the interlocutor is not even heard by the app (except in some cases of loud conversations without headphones). The backend is written in Python, and the ML models are on PyTorch. The server receives the audio and detects pronunciation errors, which are sent back to the app. I won’t go into the implementation details of the pipeline itself, as that’s a topic for a separate post. To simplify, everything is arranged as follows: the audio is recognized into text, the text is translated into phonemes, and a separate model checks how well they match the sounds spoken in the audio recording. Privacy: of course we don’t collect the recordings themselves, only keeping statistics on errors. Besides, we don’t need English speech with a strong accent. I can record that for hours myself 😅 Privacy: Next Steps I’m continuously working to improve Fluently. First of all, we are building web and mobile apps. To significantly increase Fluently potential audience. And creating daily exercises like Duolingo, based on your most common mistakes. It’s about making learning fun and useful for  daily routine. Got questions or feedback? I’m here to hear from you!

How I Built An AI App To Help Busy (Lazy) People Improve Their English Speaking Skills

ব্যস্ত (অলস) লোকেদের তাদের ইংরেজি বলার দক্ষতা উন্নত করতে সাহায্য করার জন্য আমি কীভাবে একটি AI অ্যাপ তৈরি করেছি

Wie ich eine KI-App entwickelt habe, die vielbeschäftigten (faulen) Menschen hilft, ihre Englischkenntnisse zu verbessern

Cómo creé una aplicación de inteligencia artificial para ayudar a las personas ocupadas (perezosas) a mejorar sus habilidades para hablar inglés

Comment j'ai créé une application d'IA pour aider les personnes occupées (paresseuses) à améliorer leurs compétences en anglais

कैसे मैंने व्यस्त (आलसी) लोगों को उनकी अंग्रेजी बोलने की क्षमता सुधारने में मदद करने के लिए एक AI ऐप बनाया

忙しい（怠け者）人の英語会話力向上を支援する AI アプリの構築方法

바쁜(게으른) 사람들의 영어 말하기 능력 향상을 돕기 위해 AI 앱을 구축한 방법

Como desenvolvi um aplicativo de IA para ajudar pessoas ocupadas (preguiçosas) a melhorar suas habilidades de falar inglês

Как я создал приложение с искусственным интеллектом, чтобы помочь занятым (ленивым) людям улучшить навыки разговорной речи на английском языке

Meşgul (Tembel) İnsanların İngilizce Konuşma Becerilerini Geliştirmelerine Yardımcı Olmak İçin Nasıl Bir Yapay Zeka Uygulaması Geliştirdim

Cách tôi xây dựng ứng dụng AI để giúp những người bận rộn (lười biếng) cải thiện kỹ năng nói tiếng Anh

我如何开发一款人工智能应用程序来帮助忙碌（懒惰）的人提高英语口语技能

10 Proven Strategies to Grow Your iOS App

A new theory from a YouTuber suggests Satoshi Nakamoto, the founder of Bitcoin may comprise of three people who merged their first and last names. This is contrary to previous theories that suggest Satoshi is just one person. Certain individuals suspected to be Satoshi may not have comprised of the ‘persons’ that founded Bitcoin. Of course, you've heard of Bitcoin. You've also heard that its creator is the mysterious Satoshi Nakamoto. This theory emerged on October 31st, 2008, after the Bitcoin white paper was released via a cypherpunk mailing list under the name Satoshi Nakamoto, leaving the world to speculate whether it was an individual or a group. New evidence has brought us closer to identifying who Satoshi is. Many believe Satoshi Nakamoto is just one person; well, we are about to find out. Satoshi Nakamoto Comprises of 3 persons - New Evidence Reveals Recent evidence presented by a Youtuber - Fooch, suggests that Hal Finney, the first person to receive Bitcoin, and Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonymous creator of Bitcoin, may have attended the same conference, Crypto '98, in Santa Barbara, California in 1998. By checking the event's program info, Fooch discovers a Satoshi in attendance. Searching for the term "Naka" leads him to a page detailing a presentation by Satoshi Hada and Toshiaki Tanaka on The Existence of 3-round Zero-knowledge Protocols at Crypto '98. That's not all. Fooch then searched on Google for Satoshi Hada Nakamoto, and boom, this post on X popped up, showing that the creators of Bitcoin allegedly comprise three researchers who may have also worked with IBM. The archived link leads to an IBM research paper. “Satoshi is allegedly 3 researchers from IBM”. Fooch said. Also, Fooch’s check on Toshiaki Tanaka and Naohiko Uramoto shows that they, at one time, worked at IBM. Right under the post is a comment tagging what seems to be Satoshi Hada’s account. Here's what it looks like 👇🏽 Maybe a coincidence 🧐 Under Satoshi Hada's most recent post on X, which was in 2017 by the way, someone commented by typing 'Satoshi Nakamoto' backward. What does this person know? Also, Satoshi Hada's previous repost on X in 2012 was about the IBM CEO predicting the future of business. Fooch's intelligent investigation was able to connect the dots based on an interview with Fran, Hal Finney’s wife. She recalled her husband communicating with someone named Satoshi, whom he believed to be based in Japan. Evidence from a YouTube video by The Bitcoin Layer corroborates that Satoshi’s working hours align with the PST time zone which is used in Japan. If “They” Are Satoshi, Why Are They Hiding? Fooch is of the opinion that the Japanese are humble people unlike Americans or Australians who may want to prove anything. Well, what do you think about Fooch’s theory? It appears to be the closest sketch to drawing Satoshi Nakamoto though. Another interesting thing that can be noticed is Satoshi's use of “we” in the bitcoin whitepaper - “We propose a…” Other Alleged Satoshis In an adventure to discover the genius behind Bitcoin, various theories have emerged. Some individuals have purposely claimed to be Satoshi despite evidence proving otherwise. Others have been linked to Satoshi because of their early association with Bitcoin, and one unlucky fellow was accused due to a name coincidence. Let's find out who they are and why they may not be 'Satoshi’. Craig Wright An Australian scientist who has been ruled as a fraudster by a judge in the United Kingdom has long claimed to be the founder of Bitcoin. However, his claims lack tangible evidence beyond document forgery, and he has offered many excuses for his inability to prove it, including 'stomping on the hard drive’ that contains files to prove that he created Bitcoin. Dorian Nakamoto When you google Satoshi Nakamoto, the image you often see is that of Dorian Nakamoto, who has denied being the founder of Bitcoin despite the name coincidence. Dorian is a retired physicist. In a 2014 exposé with Newsweek, where he was accused of being the founder of Bitcoin, he claimed he was wrongly quoted when asked about Bitcoin, thinking the question related to his career, and said: “I am no longer involved in that and I cannot discuss it.” When the exposé went viral, Dorian stated that he felt victimized and decided to tell his own side of the story. “I’m saying I’m no longer in engineering. That’s it. And even if I was, when we get hired, you have to sign this document, contract saying you will not reveal anything we divulge during and after employment. So that’s what I implied.
It sounded like I was involved before with bitcoin and looked like I’m not involved now. That’s not what I meant. I want to clarify that.” Dorian's side of the story attracted sympathy from the Bitcoin community, resulting in donations of over 102 bitcoins which is worth almost a hundred million dollars today. Gavin Andersen It's understandable why some might have suspected Gavin Andresen of being Satoshi Nakamoto. He joined Bitcoin as a core developer in its early stages, creating important features that remain crucial to the Bitcoin ecosystem today. In the documentary "The Bitcoin Story," Gavin repeatedly referred to Satoshi as a "he" and emphasized Satoshi's genius: “He's obviously had some academic training because he wrote this academic whitepaper that is in the style of a peer reviewed academic journal article. He's obviously a genius. I’d love to meet him someday.” “As far as I know, no one has actually met Satoshi. No one knows who he, or she, or they are. I've never talked with Satoshi although I have communicated with him electronically via email or on online forums.
Satoshi started working on Bitcoin he says in 2007, and it actually took him a couple of years to convince himself that he could actually create a system that would work.” Gavin believes he was the last person to speak with Satoshi: “I don't know who might have had the last interaction with Satoshi, it might have possibly been me. My very last email to Satoshi, I actually told him I had been invited to give a talk at the CIA. He had already told me he was going to step back. I don't know if me telling him I was going to visit the CIA was the reason I never heard from him again but I certainly think it didn't help.” Hal Finney If you're a Bitcoin enthusiast, you've likely heard of Hal Finney. He was the first person to receive Bitcoin in a transaction, receiving 10 bitcoins from Satoshi Nakamoto on January 12, 2009. This marked him as an early supporter and contributor to the project. As a cryptographer, Finney recognized the potential of Bitcoin, predicted that it would hit $1 million, and actively contributed to its development. He was a passionate advocate for privacy and saw Bitcoin as a solution to financial transaction privacy concerns. Sadly, Hal passed away on August 28, 2014, after battling with complications from Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) for five years. Recent research by Jameson Lopp, a Bitcoin researcher, has provided evidence that Hal Finney was not Satoshi Nakamoto. This research analyzed the timing of a specific Bitcoin transaction and Hal Finney's participation in a race, concluding that they occurred simultaneously, making it impossible for him to have been Satoshi at that time. Adam Back British cryptographer and CEO of Blockstream has also been suspected to be Satoshi because of his early involvement with Bitcoin. In 1997, Adam developed Hashcash, a proof-of-work system that is now used in Bitcoin mining. This invention is referenced in Satoshi Nakamoto's Bitcoin white paper. Through public emails revealed between Satoshi and Adam, it appears both individuals have distinct communication styles and technical expertise. Len Sasseman Len Sassaman, a renowned cryptographer and academic researcher, made significant contributions to the field of cryptography and privacy. While his work indirectly influenced the development of Bitcoin, there is no concrete evidence to support the claim that he was Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonymous creator of Bitcoin. After Sassaman's untimely death in 2011, the Bitcoin community honored him in a unique and lasting way. A tribute was embedded in block 138725 of the Bitcoin blockchain, forever commemorating his legacy. A message in the block reads: "Len was our friend.A brilliant mind, a kind soul, and a devious schemer.” A new theory from a YouTuber suggests Satoshi Nakamoto, the founder of Bitcoin may comprise of three people who merged their first and last names. This is contrary to previous theories that suggest Satoshi is just one person. A new theory from a YouTuber suggests Satoshi Nakamoto, the founder of Bitcoin may comprise of three people who merged their first and last names. This is contrary to previous theories that suggest Satoshi is just one person. A new theory from a YouTuber suggests Satoshi Nakamoto, the founder of Bitcoin may comprise of three people who merged their first and last names. This is contrary to previous theories that suggest Satoshi is just one person. Certain individuals suspected to be Satoshi may not have comprised of the ‘persons’ that founded Bitcoin. Certain individuals suspected to be Satoshi may not have comprised of the ‘persons’ that founded Bitcoin . Certain individuals suspected to be Satoshi may not have comprised of the ‘persons’ that founded Bitcoin Of course, you've heard of Bitcoin. You've also heard that its creator is the mysterious Satoshi Nakamoto. This theory emerged on October 31st, 2008, after the Bitcoin white paper was released via a cypherpunk mailing list under the name Satoshi Nakamoto, leaving the world to speculate whether it was an individual or a group. New evidence has brought us closer to identifying who Satoshi is. Many believe Satoshi Nakamoto is just one person; well, we are about to find out. Satoshi Nakamoto Comprises of 3 persons - New Evidence Reveals Recent evidence presented by a Youtuber - Fooch, suggests that Hal Finney, the first person to receive Bitcoin, and Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonymous creator of Bitcoin, may have attended the same conference, Crypto '98, in Santa Barbara, California in 1998. By checking the event's program info, Fooch discovers a Satoshi in attendance. Searching for the term "Naka" leads him to a page detailing a presentation by Satoshi Hada and Toshiaki Tanaka on The Existence of 3-round Zero-knowledge Protocols at Crypto '98. The Existence of 3-round Zero-knowledge Protocols Crypto '98. That's not all. Fooch then searched on Google for Satoshi Hada Nakamoto , and boom, this post on X popped up, showing that the creators of Bitcoin allegedly comprise three researchers who may have also worked with IBM. The archived link leads to an IBM research paper. Satoshi Hada Nakamoto “Satoshi is allegedly 3 researchers from IBM”. Fooch said. Also, Fooch’s check on Toshiaki Tanaka and Naohiko Uramoto shows that they, at one time, worked at IBM. Right under the post is a comment tagging what seems to be Satoshi Hada’s account. Here's what it looks like 👇🏽 Maybe a coincidence 🧐 Under Satoshi Hada's most recent post on X, which was in 2017 by the way, someone commented by typing 'Satoshi Nakamoto' backward. What does this person know? Also, Satoshi Hada's previous repost on X in 2012 was about the IBM CEO predicting the future of business. Fooch's intelligent investigation was able to connect the dots based on an interview with Fran, Hal Finney’s wife. She recalled her husband communicating with someone named Satoshi, whom he believed to be based in Japan. Evidence from a YouTube video by The Bitcoin Layer corroborates that Satoshi’s working hours align with the PST time zone which is used in Japan. If “They” Are Satoshi, Why Are They Hiding? Fooch is of the opinion that the Japanese are humble people unlike Americans or Australians who may want to prove anything. Well, what do you think about Fooch’s theory? It appears to be the closest sketch to drawing Satoshi Nakamoto though. Another interesting thing that can be noticed is Satoshi's use of “we” in the bitcoin whitepaper - “We propose a…” Other Alleged Satoshis In an adventure to discover the genius behind Bitcoin, various theories have emerged. Some individuals have purposely claimed to be Satoshi despite evidence proving otherwise. Others have been linked to Satoshi because of their early association with Bitcoin, and one unlucky fellow was accused due to a name coincidence. Let's find out who they are and why they may not be 'Satoshi’. Craig Wright Craig Wright Craig Wright An Australian scientist who has been ruled as a fraudster by a judge in the United Kingdom has long claimed to be the founder of Bitcoin. However, his claims lack tangible evidence beyond document forgery, and he has offered many excuses for his inability to prove it, including 'stomping on the hard drive’ that contains files to prove that he created Bitcoin. Dorian Nakamoto Dorian Nakamoto Dorian Nakamoto When you google Satoshi Nakamoto, the image you often see is that of Dorian Nakamoto, who has denied being the founder of Bitcoin despite the name coincidence. Dorian is a retired physicist. In a 2014 exposé with Newsweek , where he was accused of being the founder of Bitcoin, he claimed he was wrongly quoted when asked about Bitcoin, thinking the question related to his career, and said: Newsweek “I am no longer involved in that and I cannot discuss it.” “I am no longer involved in that and I cannot discuss it.” When the exposé went viral, Dorian stated that he felt victimized and decided to tell his own side of the story. “I’m saying I’m no longer in engineering. That’s it. And even if I was, when we get hired, you have to sign this document, contract saying you will not reveal anything we divulge during and after employment. So that’s what I implied. It sounded like I was involved before with bitcoin and looked like I’m not involved now. That’s not what I meant. I want to clarify that.” “I’m saying I’m no longer in engineering. That’s it. And even if I was, when we get hired, you have to sign this document, contract saying you will not reveal anything we divulge during and after employment. So that’s what I implied. It sounded like I was involved before with bitcoin and looked like I’m not involved now. That’s not what I meant. I want to clarify that.” Dorian's side of the story attracted sympathy from the Bitcoin community, resulting in donations of over 102 bitcoins which is worth almost a hundred million dollars today. Gavin Andersen Gavin Andersen Gavin Andersen It's understandable why some might have suspected Gavin Andresen of being Satoshi Nakamoto. He joined Bitcoin as a core developer in its early stages, creating important features that remain crucial to the Bitcoin ecosystem today. In the documentary "The Bitcoin Story," Gavin repeatedly referred to Satoshi as a "he" and emphasized Satoshi's genius: “He's obviously had some academic training because he wrote this academic whitepaper that is in the style of a peer reviewed academic journal article. He's obviously a genius. I’d love to meet him someday.” “He's obviously had some academic training because he wrote this academic whitepaper that is in the style of a peer reviewed academic journal article. He's obviously a genius. I’d love to meet him someday.” “As far as I know, no one has actually met Satoshi. No one knows who he, or she, or they are. I've never talked with Satoshi although I have communicated with him electronically via email or on online forums. Satoshi started working on Bitcoin he says in 2007, and it actually took him a couple of years to convince himself that he could actually create a system that would work.” “As far as I know, no one has actually met Satoshi. No one knows who he, or she, or they are. I've never talked with Satoshi although I have communicated with him electronically via email or on online forums. Satoshi started working on Bitcoin he says in 2007, and it actually took him a couple of years to convince himself that he could actually create a system that would work.” Gavin believes he was the last person to speak with Satoshi: “I don't know who might have had the last interaction with Satoshi, it might have possibly been me. My very last email to Satoshi, I actually told him I had been invited to give a talk at the CIA. He had already told me he was going to step back. I don't know if me telling him I was going to visit the CIA was the reason I never heard from him again but I certainly think it didn't help.” “I don't know who might have had the last interaction with Satoshi, it might have possibly been me. My very last email to Satoshi, I actually told him I had been invited to give a talk at the CIA. He had already told me he was going to step back. I don't know if me telling him I was going to visit the CIA was the reason I never heard from him again but I certainly think it didn't help.” Hal Finney Hal Finney Hal Finney If you're a Bitcoin enthusiast, you've likely heard of Hal Finney. He was the first person to receive Bitcoin in a transaction, receiving 10 bitcoins from Satoshi Nakamoto on January 12, 2009. This marked him as an early supporter and contributor to the project. As a cryptographer, Finney recognized the potential of Bitcoin, predicted that it would hit $1 million, and actively contributed to its development. He was a passionate advocate for privacy and saw Bitcoin as a solution to financial transaction privacy concerns. Sadly, Hal passed away on August 28, 2014, after battling with complications from Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) for five years. Recent research by Jameson Lopp, a Bitcoin researcher, has provided evidence that Hal Finney was not Satoshi Nakamoto. This research analyzed the timing of a specific Bitcoin transaction and Hal Finney's participation in a race, concluding that they occurred simultaneously, making it impossible for him to have been Satoshi at that time. Adam Back Adam Back Adam Back British cryptographer and CEO of Blockstream has also been suspected to be Satoshi because of his early involvement with Bitcoin. In 1997, Adam developed Hashcash, a proof-of-work system that is now used in Bitcoin mining. This invention is referenced in Satoshi Nakamoto's Bitcoin white paper. Through public emails revealed between Satoshi and Adam, it appears both individuals have distinct communication styles and technical expertise. Len Sasseman Len Sasseman Len Sasseman Len Sassaman, a renowned cryptographer and academic researcher, made significant contributions to the field of cryptography and privacy. While his work indirectly influenced the development of Bitcoin, there is no concrete evidence to support the claim that he was Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonymous creator of Bitcoin. After Sassaman's untimely death in 2011, the Bitcoin community honored him in a unique and lasting way. A tribute was embedded in block 138725 of the Bitcoin blockchain, forever commemorating his legacy. A message in the block reads: " Len was our friend.A brilliant mind, a kind soul, and a devious schemer .” Len was our friend.A brilliant mind, a kind soul, and a devious schemer

Has Satoshi Nakamoto's Identity Finally Been Revealed?

সাতোশি নাকামোটোর পরিচয় কি অবশেষে প্রকাশ করা হয়েছে?

Wurde die Identität von Satoshi Nakamoto endlich enthüllt?

¿Se ha revelado finalmente la identidad de Satoshi Nakamoto?

L'identité de Satoshi Nakamoto a-t-elle enfin été révélée ?

क्या सातोशी नाकामोतो की पहचान अंततः उजागर हो गई है?

サトシ・ナカモトの正体はついに明らかになったのか？

나카모토 사토시의 정체가 드디어 밝혀졌나요?

A identidade de Satoshi Nakamoto foi finalmente revelada?

Личность Сатоши Накамото наконец раскрыта?

Satoshi Nakamoto'nun Kimliği Nihayet Ortaya Çıktı mı?

Danh tính của Satoshi Nakamoto cuối cùng đã được tiết lộ?

中本聪的身份终于揭晓了吗？

Hey hackers! If you’re a budding author looking for feedback and growing your personal brand, should you: Publish on an “anything-goes” website?


Or one where your content will be edited and reviewed by an actual person? The answer is of course B! As you’re probably aware, HackerNoon is designed for technologists to read, write, and publish. We publish tons of stories every day, including reposts from other websites. But what if one were to publish on HackerNoon first and then republish their content elsewhere? Well, here’s why that might be a good idea... 1. Original Content Gets More Attention For starters, HackerNoon greatly prioritizes original content that hasn’t been published elsewhere. That means, better publishing turn-around times; priority responses from editors; better distribution; and, of course, the chance to be featured on the homepage! Being on the homepage as a top story also grants your story auto-translation to 11 languages + wider distribution across the internet. All of that is great, but there's something that makes publishing on HackerNoon even better: 2. Human First HackerNoon isn’t where technologists come just to get published. It’s where they come to get validated. All stories submitted to HackerNoon go through a rigorous review by real, human editors who take your work from good to great. That means that once your content is published on HackerNoon, you will be redistributing the best version of your work to the rest of the internet. Also, given that HackerNoon editors are very well versed in things like SEO, keyword curation, writing meta descriptions, as well as choosing the right image (or generating one for your article using AI), you have a higher chance of ranking on Google once you get published on HackerNoon. 3. High Domain Rating HackerNoon has a much higher domain rating than some of the other publishing websites out there. According to AHREFS, our domain rating is at 88, a particularly high number: This means that if two websites post similar articles targeting the same keyword, domain ranking could determine which article gets placed higher on Google, and which article gets more clicks and engagement. By posting your articles on HackerNoon, you give yourself a higher chance of ranking on Google for competitive keywords, and your article greater chances to get more views, more social shares, more backlinks, and longer life on the first page of Google SERPs. Here’s a post from a HackerNoon contributor detailing their experience posting the same content across multiple websites (spoiler: HackerNoon absolutely crushed it for them!). https://hackernoon.com/which-writing-platform-really-works-for-newbie-tech-writers-in-2023-and-why?embedable=true So if you’re sitting on content, and getting ready to publish, we hope these tips will help sway you in the direction of HackerNoon, instead of the other way around ;-) And before you go… Here is a repository of writing templates you can use to write your next HackerNoon Top Story, in case you’re looking for ideas. Better yet, HackerNoon is currently running the #blockchain-api Writing Contest, offering contributors the chance to win cash prizes! We’ve included a starter template pack to help you generate a solid entry for the competition. We’re looking forward to your submissions! Hey hackers! If you’re a budding author looking for feedback and growing your personal brand, should you: If you’re a budding author looking for feedback and growing your personal brand, should you: Publish on an “anything-goes” website? Or one where your content will be edited and reviewed by an actual person? Publish on an “anything-goes” website? Publish on an “anything-goes” website? Or one where your content will be edited and reviewed by an actual person? Or one where your content will be edited and reviewed by an actual person? The answer is of course B! The answer is of course B! As you’re probably aware, HackerNoon is designed for technologists to read, write, and publish. We publish tons of stories every day, including reposts from other websites. But what if one were to publish on HackerNoon first and then republish their content elsewhere? Well, here’s why that might be a good idea... first then 1. Original Content Gets More Attention For starters, HackerNoon greatly prioritizes original content that hasn’t been published elsewhere. That means, better publishing turn-around times; priority responses from editors; better distribution; and, of course, the chance to be featured on the homepage! Being on the homepage as a top story also grants your story auto-translation to 11 languages + wider distribution across the internet. top story top story 11 languages wider distribution wider distribution All of that is great, but there's something that makes publishing on HackerNoon even better: All of that is great, but there's something that makes publishing on HackerNoon even better: 2. Human First 2. Human First HackerNoon isn’t where technologists come just to get published. It’s where they come to get validated . All stories submitted to HackerNoon go through a rigorous review by real, human editors who take your work from good to great. That means that once your content is published on HackerNoon, you will be redistributing the best version of your work to the rest of the internet. just get validated get validated Also, given that HackerNoon editors are very well versed in things like SEO , keyword curation , writing meta descriptions , as well as choosing the right image (or generating one for your article using AI ), you have a higher chance of ranking on Google once you get published on HackerNoon. SEO SEO keyword curation keyword curation writing writing meta descriptions meta descriptions AI 3. High Domain Rating HackerNoon has a much higher domain rating than some of the other publishing websites out there. According to AHREFS, our domain rating is at 88, a particularly high number: much higher domain rating much higher domain rating This means that if two websites post similar articles targeting the same keyword, domain ranking could determine which article gets placed higher on Google, and which article gets more clicks and engagement. By posting your articles on HackerNoon, you give yourself a higher chance of ranking on Google for competitive keywords, and your article greater chances to get more views, more social shares, more backlinks, and longer life on the first page of Google SERPs. Here’s a post from a HackerNoon contributor detailing their experience posting the same content across multiple websites (spoiler: HackerNoon absolutely crushed it for them!). their experience their experience https://hackernoon.com/which-writing-platform-really-works-for-newbie-tech-writers-in-2023-and-why?embedable=true https://hackernoon.com/which-writing-platform-really-works-for-newbie-tech-writers-in-2023-and-why?embedable=true So if you’re sitting on content, and getting ready to publish, we hope these tips will help sway you in the direction of HackerNoon, instead of the other way around ;-) And before you go… Here is a repository of writing templates you can use to write your next HackerNoon Top Story, in case you’re looking for ideas. repository repository Better yet, HackerNoon is currently running the #blockchain-api Writing Contest , offering contributors the chance to win cash prizes! We’ve included a starter template pack to help you generate a solid entry for the competition. #blockchain-api Writing Contest #blockchain-api Writing Contest template template We’re looking forward to your submissions!

Why Choosing to Publish on HackerNoon First Matters

কেন হ্যাকারনুন ফার্স্ট ম্যাটারস-এ প্রকাশ করা বেছে নেওয়া হচ্ছে

Warum es wichtig ist, zuerst auf HackerNoon zu veröffentlichen

Por qué es importante elegir publicar en HackerNoon

Pourquoi choisir de publier sur HackerNoon First Matters

हैकरनून फर्स्ट पर प्रकाशित करना क्यों महत्वपूर्ण है

HackerNoon に最初に投稿することを選択することがなぜ重要なのか

HackerNoon에 게시하기로 선택하는 것이 가장 중요한 이유

Por que escolher publicar no HackerNoon é importante

Почему выбор публикации на HackerNoon First имеет значение

Neden HackerNoon First'te Yayınlamayı Seçmek Önemlidir?

Tại sao chọn xuất bản trên HackerNoon Vấn đề đầu tiên

为什么选择首先在 HackerNoon 上发布文章很重要

Hi! Today, I want to tell you how I launched my project Chill Subs spending only $6 on a domain and gaining 3000 followers on my brand new Twitter/X account in the first 3 days. For a bit of context, Chill Subs is, at its core, a database of over 4000 opportunities for writers looking to publish their work. When I started it, it was just me, and the website listed only 75 literary magazines. Two years later, we’re a team of 7 people working full-time in 5 different countries, and the website has over 26,000 registered users and over 60,000 followers on social media. And it all started with just one fun weekend of coding after getting a beer in a bar in Gdansk. Alright, let’s unpack this! Idea & Execution Like is often the case with great projects, I wasn’t even looking to launch a startup. I was just mad at the way things were, wanted a better solution for myself, and then somewhere halfway, realized that it actually might be useful for other people. When you’re solving your own problem or the problem of people close to you, you have a massive advantage right from the start - the confidence in what you’re creating. You know when your solution works because you’re the first one to test-drive it. So, all that is left is to just make it known to other people (which, of course, is not a simple task, but much much easier and more pleasant to do when you’re not trying to sell something useless) You don’t have to do anything super revolutionary. It can be just a website with a better UX than your competitor has. Or just that one missing feature that makes all the difference. The main thing is that you have to love it yourself and have this “Ohhhh I can’t wait to use it” thought running through your mind during development. Note on finding the right ideas for yourself: I think fantastic projects happen when you bring together two of your different skills/passions. The fact that I know how to code and also am genuinely interested in the literary world gave me a unique advantage in creating a startup for writers. Few people in the industry know how to code, and when business sharks from outside the industry come and try to make a business there, it fails because they don’t fully understand the pains and needs of the community. I studied the indie lit scene for 3 months before my project was born. I looked for literary magazines everywhere and put the ones I liked into a spreadsheet with all of their main submission guidelines and what I loved about the journal. Here’s what it looked like: I noticed a lot of things while I was doing this. For example, magazines are hard to find unless they’re The New Yorker, and when you do find them, it’s unclear whether they accept work right now and what their guidelines are. Sometimes, you might be looking at 5 pages of unformatted text trying to look for info with Ctrl+F. Or the page can say “Follow us on Twitter to know when we open!” Oof. Then some places accept work through a submission portal, some through email, and some through Google Forms. Some want you to only use that specific font. Some want your bio under 50 words, and some under 75 words. And hundreds of other rules like that. There was already a website called Duotrope where you could find magazines and their stats, but it’s $5/m, and it looks like this: I had two issues with this: I thought that magazine discovery should be free.


I wanted something that looked less like a control panel, and more like a fun inviting place where writers could truly connect to a magazine. We’re talking about a creative industry here, so I knew people would appreciate a more human touch. And that’s how I knew what I should do. I needed to turn my spreadsheet of lit mags into a free searchable database. Industry Connections (You Don’t Need Many) In my case, just one was enough. But it has to be a quality one. How do you find it? Look for the industry leaders. Not necessarily someone at the very top; they can be just cool guys on the indie scene, someone who people love and who has high post engagement. If you launch inside this smaller but engaged circle of people and they love the product, it will scale naturally. My connection was Bullshit Lit - a new magazine that writers fell in love with as the magazine had this punky not taking yourself too seriously feel (and well, of course, the title) So, when I had a prototype ready, I sent a few screenshots to the editor and she loved it. This gave me the needed validation to finish it and launch it publicly. And when I wrote the announcement tweet (the page had 0 followers), they reposted it, and it went viral immediately. But it’s not the only reason why. Good project + nice connections + … great presentation. Let’s go. Social Media Launch I launched only on Twitter so that first tweet was all I had. I needed to make it work. What I did: I spent a few days perfecting the text so that it describes the thing most effectively. People needed to know all the main features it has, and they needed to feel the vibe of the website through these words
.


I think crafting a presentation text as early as you can (even before the project is ready) is super important. I read Build and Tony Fadell says the same: this helps you understand what the most important features are. If they’re not in this announcement, they can probably wait.


I made a screen recording of using the website myself. This made it easy for people to get a feel of it without leaving Twitter. Everyone already loved the website before even clicking the link. This is what the final post looked like: In the thread, I added some secondary information like less shiny features, plans for the project, and the link for Buy Me a Coffee. Website Copy and Power of the First Impression So many people talked about the text on the website and said that the tone was the thing that attracted them initially. Not even features. Remember, the website only had 75 magazines while the competitor had over 3000. This is what one of the first website versions looked like: And this is what the About page said: Writers said how reading all this was a breath of fresh air, and that this was exactly how they felt. They tweeted individual lines and screenshots. And not only users! My teammates said they wanted to work with me based on that text alone. Now, I don’t say that all the websites need to talk like this. What matters here is being able to read your audience and feel what tone would speak to them the most. Finally, Start Small and Don’t Overthink (the Hardest One for Me) I found that I really need to make myself launch the thing before I give myself too much time to let my inner critic talk. Before I think “I need to rewrite the whole thing”/”Not enough features”/”Not enough audience”/etc. In this particular case, I could think that 75 is too few magazines. The people wouldn’t even take it seriously! I could spend a few more months improving the dataset (a few more months without testing my idea!) But this is not what mattered in the end. People appreciated the feel of it and its accessibility, not quantity. It represented a needed change in the industry. And this gave them a reason to follow. In a separate article, I want to talk about different ways to keep those followers engaged, so you may want to subscribe so as not to miss it. Now, go launch something yourself! Hi! Today, I want to tell you how I launched my project Chill Subs spending only $6 on a domain and gaining 3000 followers on my brand new Twitter/X account in the first 3 days. Hi! Today, I want to tell you how I launched my project Chill Subs spending only $6 on a domain and gaining 3000 followers on my brand new Twitter/X account in the first 3 days. Chill Subs Chill Subs For a bit of context, Chill Subs is, at its core, a database of over 4000 opportunities for writers looking to publish their work. When I started it, it was just me, and the website listed only 75 literary magazines. Two years later, we’re a team of 7 people working full-time in 5 different countries, and the website has over 26,000 registered users and over 60,000 followers on social media. And it all started with just one fun weekend of coding after getting a beer in a bar in Gdansk. Alright, let’s unpack this! Idea & Execution Like is often the case with great projects, I wasn’t even looking to launch a startup. I was just mad at the way things were, wanted a better solution for myself, and then somewhere halfway, realized that it actually might be useful for other people. When you’re solving your own problem or the problem of people close to you, you have a massive advantage right from the start - the confidence in what you’re creating. You know when your solution works because you’re the first one to test-drive it. So, all that is left is to just make it known to other people (which, of course, is not a simple task, but much much easier and more pleasant to do when you’re not trying to sell something useless) You don’t have to do anything super revolutionary. It can be just a website with a better UX than your competitor has. Or just that one missing feature that makes all the difference. The main thing is that you have to love it yourself and have this “Ohhhh I can’t wait to use it” thought running through your mind during development. Note on finding the right ideas for yourself: I think fantastic projects happen when you bring together two of your different skills/passions. The fact that I know how to code and also am genuinely interested in the literary world gave me a unique advantage in creating a startup for writers. Few people in the industry know how to code, and when business sharks from outside the industry come and try to make a business there, it fails because they don’t fully understand the pains and needs of the community. Note on finding the right ideas for yourself: I think fantastic projects happen when you bring together two of your different skills/passions. The fact that I know how to code and also am genuinely interested in the literary world gave me a unique advantage in creating a startup for writers. Few people in the industry know how to code, and when business sharks from outside the industry come and try to make a business there, it fails because they don’t fully understand the pains and needs of the community. Note on finding the right ideas for yourself: I studied the indie lit scene for 3 months before my project was born. I looked for literary magazines everywhere and put the ones I liked into a spreadsheet with all of their main submission guidelines and what I loved about the journal. Here’s what it looked like: I noticed a lot of things while I was doing this. For example, magazines are hard to find unless they’re The New Yorker, and when you do find them, it’s unclear whether they accept work right now and what their guidelines are. Sometimes, you might be looking at 5 pages of unformatted text trying to look for info with Ctrl+F. Or the page can say “Follow us on Twitter to know when we open!” Oof. Then some places accept work through a submission portal, some through email, and some through Google Forms. Some want you to only use that specific font. Some want your bio under 50 words, and some under 75 words. And hundreds of other rules like that. There was already a website called Duotrope where you could find magazines and their stats, but it’s $5/m, and it looks like this: I had two issues with this: I thought that magazine discovery should be free. I wanted something that looked less like a control panel, and more like a fun inviting place where writers could truly connect to a magazine. We’re talking about a creative industry here, so I knew people would appreciate a more human touch. I thought that magazine discovery should be free. I thought that magazine discovery should be free. I wanted something that looked less like a control panel, and more like a fun inviting place where writers could truly connect to a magazine. We’re talking about a creative industry here, so I knew people would appreciate a more human touch. I wanted something that looked less like a control panel, and more like a fun inviting place where writers could truly connect to a magazine. We’re talking about a creative industry here, so I knew people would appreciate a more human touch. And that’s how I knew what I should do. I needed to turn my spreadsheet of lit mags into a free searchable database. Industry Connections (You Don’t Need Many) Industry Connections (You Don’t Need Many) In my case, just one was enough. But it has to be a quality one. How do you find it? Look for the industry leaders. Not necessarily someone at the very top; they can be just cool guys on the indie scene, someone who people love and who has high post engagement. If you launch inside this smaller but engaged circle of people and they love the product, it will scale naturally. My connection was Bullshit Lit - a new magazine that writers fell in love with as the magazine had this punky not taking yourself too seriously feel (and well, of course, the title) So, when I had a prototype ready, I sent a few screenshots to the editor and she loved it. This gave me the needed validation to finish it and launch it publicly. And when I wrote the announcement tweet (the page had 0 followers), they reposted it, and it went viral immediately. But it’s not the only reason why. Good project + nice connections + … great presentation. Let’s go. Social Media Launch I launched only on Twitter so that first tweet was all I had. I needed to make it work. What I did: I spent a few days perfecting the text so that it describes the thing most effectively. People needed to know all the main features it has, and they needed to feel the vibe of the website through these words
. I think crafting a presentation text as early as you can (even before the project is ready) is super important. I read Build and Tony Fadell says the same: this helps you understand what the most important features are. If they’re not in this announcement, they can probably wait. I made a screen recording of using the website myself. This made it easy for people to get a feel of it without leaving Twitter. Everyone already loved the website before even clicking the link. I spent a few days perfecting the text so that it describes the thing most effectively. People needed to know all the main features it has, and they needed to feel the vibe of the website through these words . I spent a few days perfecting the text so that it describes the thing most effectively. People needed to know all the main features it has, and they needed to feel the vibe of the website through these words . I think crafting a presentation text as early as you can (even before the project is ready) is super important. I read Build and Tony Fadell says the same: this helps you understand what the most important features are. If they’re not in this announcement, they can probably wait. I think crafting a presentation text as early as you can (even before the project is ready) is super important. I read Build and Tony Fadell says the same: this helps you understand what the most important features are. If they’re not in this announcement, they can probably wait. Build Build I made a screen recording of using the website myself. This made it easy for people to get a feel of it without leaving Twitter. Everyone already loved the website before even clicking the link. I made a screen recording of using the website myself. This made it easy for people to get a feel of it without leaving Twitter. Everyone already loved the website before even clicking the link. This is what the final post looked like: In the thread, I added some secondary information like less shiny features, plans for the project, and the link for Buy Me a Coffee. Website Copy and Power of the First Impression Website Copy and Power of the First Impression So many people talked about the text on the website and said that the tone was the thing that attracted them initially. Not even features. Remember, the website only had 75 magazines while the competitor had over 3000. This is what one of the first website versions looked like: one of the first website And this is what the About page said: Writers said how reading all this was a breath of fresh air, and that this was exactly how they felt. They tweeted individual lines and screenshots. And not only users! My teammates said they wanted to work with me based on that text alone. Now, I don’t say that all the websites need to talk like this. What matters here is being able to read your audience and feel what tone would speak to them the most. Finally, Start Small and Don’t Overthink (the Hardest One for Me) I found that I really need to make myself launch the thing before I give myself too much time to let my inner critic talk. Before I think “I need to rewrite the whole thing”/”Not enough features”/”Not enough audience”/etc. In this particular case, I could think that 75 is too few magazines. The people wouldn’t even take it seriously! I could spend a few more months improving the dataset (a few more months without testing my idea!) But this is not what mattered in the end. People appreciated the feel of it and its accessibility, not quantity. It represented a needed change in the industry. And this gave them a reason to follow. In a separate article, I want to talk about different ways to keep those followers engaged, so you may want to subscribe so as not to miss it. In a separate article, I want to talk about different ways to keep those followers engaged, so you may want to subscribe so as not to miss it. In a separate article, I want to talk about different ways to keep those followers engaged, so you may want to subscribe so as not to miss it. subscribe subscribe Now, go launch something yourself!

How to Do a Successful Product Launch When You Have 0 Followers and $6

আপনার 0 ফলোয়ার এবং $6 থাকলে কীভাবে একটি সফল পণ্য লঞ্চ করবেন

So führen Sie eine erfolgreiche Produkteinführung durch, wenn Sie 0 Follower und 6 US-Dollar haben

Cómo realizar un lanzamiento de producto exitoso cuando tienes 0 seguidores y $6

Comment réussir un lancement de produit lorsque vous avez 0 abonné et 6 $

जब आपके पास 0 फ़ॉलोअर्स और $6 हों तो सफल उत्पाद लॉन्च कैसे करें

フォロワーが0人で売上が6ドルのときに成功する製品ローンチの方法

팔로어가 0명이고 $6일 때 성공적인 제품 출시를 수행하는 방법

Como fazer um lançamento de produto bem-sucedido quando você tem 0 seguidores e US$ 6

Как сделать успешный запуск продукта, когда у вас 0 подписчиков и 6 долларов

0 Takipçiniz ve 6 Dolarınız Varken Başarılı Bir Ürün Lansmanı Nasıl Yapılır?

Cách ra mắt sản phẩm thành công khi bạn có 0 người theo dõi và 6 đô la

当你没有粉丝、资金不足 6 美元时，如何成功发布产品

RXPOST

rx-post.com

-- employees

Since n.d.

COMPANY RANKING

RXPOST

EVERGREEN INDEX #9342

Representing this company? Click here to claim and customize this page!

RxPost WIKI

Apply to get your Tech Company News Page live on HackerNoon.com today!

RXPOST

rx-post.com

-- employees

Since n.d.

COMPANY RANKING

RXPOST

EVERGREEN INDEX #9342

RELATED COMPANIESRANK

STORIES ABOUT RXPOST

Representing this company? Click here to claim and customize this page!

RxPost WIKI

Apply to get your Tech Company News Page live on HackerNoon.com today!