Pinnacle Associates Ltd. raised its holdings in shares of Marsh &amp; McLennan Companies, Inc. (NYSE:MMC – Free Report) by 2.5% in the 4th quarter, according to its most recent 13F filing with the SEC. The fund owned 6,698 shares of the financial services provider’s stock after acquiring an ...

Pinnacle Associates Ltd. Acquires 161 Shares of Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (NYSE:MMC) - Defense World

Mayflower Financial Advisors LLC bought a new position in shares of Marsh &amp; McLennan Companies, Inc. (NYSE:MMC – Free Report) during the fourth quarter, according to its most recent filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The institutional investor bought 1,541 shares of the financial ...

Mayflower Financial Advisors LLC Makes New Investment in Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (NYSE:MMC) - Defense World

Get the most recent info and news about Marsh & McLennan on HackerNoon, where 10k+ technologists publish stories for 4M+ monthly readers.

Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., a professional services company, provides advice and solutions to clients in the areas of risk, strategy, and people worldwide. It operates in two segments, Risk and Insurance Services, and Consulting. The Risk and Insurance Services segment offers risk management services, such as risk advice, risk transfer, and risk control and mitigation solutions, as well as insurance and reinsurance broking, catastrophe and financial modeling, and related advisory services; and insurance program management services. This segment serves businesses, public entities, insurance companies, associations, professional services organizations, and private clients. The Consulting segment provides health, wealth, and career services and products; and specialized management, as well as economic and brand consulting services. The company was founded in 1871 and is headquartered in New York, New York.

Marsh & McLennan

SECONDARY SEXUAL CHARACTERS OF MAN—continued.

ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE INTELLECTUAL AND MORAL FACULTIES DURING PRIMEVAL AND CIVILISED TIMES

COMPARISON OF THE MENTAL POWERS OF MAN AND THE LOWER ANIMALS

175 Stories To Learn About Dao

SEC v. Ripple Court Filing, retrieved on July 13, 2023 is part of . You can jump to any part in this filing . This part is 6 of 18. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here BACKGROUND II. Procedural Background On December 22, 2020, the SEC commenced this action. ECF No. 1. An amended complaint was filed on February 18, 2021. Am. Compl. Fact discovery closed on August 31, 2021, see ECF No. 313, and expert discovery concluded on February 28, 2022, see ECF No. 411. On March 11, 2022, the Court denied the SEC’s motion to strike Ripple’s affirmative defense that it “lacked . . . ‘notice that its conduct was in violation of law, in contravention of Ripple’s due process rights,’” ECF No. 128. ECF No. 440. That same day, the Court also denied Garlinghouse’s and Larsen’s separate motions to dismiss, ECF Nos. 105, 110. MTD Order, ECF No. 441. On March 6, 2023, the Court granted in part and denied in part the parties’ motions to preclude expert testimony. ECF No. 814. Before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment filed on September 13, 2022. ECF Nos. 621, 625; see also ECF Nos. 639, 642, 824, 836. The Court has also reviewed amicus briefs from Accredify, Inc. d/b/a/ InvestReady, ECF No. 698 [9] ; the Blockchain Association, ECF No. 706; the Chamber of Digital Commerce, ECF No. 649; Coinbase, Inc., ECF No. 705; Cryptillian Payment Systems, LLC, ECF No. 716; the Crypto Council for Innovation, ECF No. 711; I-Remit, Inc., ECF No. 660; the New Sports Economy Institute, ECF No. 717; Paradigm Operations LP, ECF No. 707; Phillip Goldstein and the Investor Choice Advocates Network, ECF No. 683; Reaper Financial, LLC, ECF No. 710; SpendTheBits, Inc., ECF No. 684; TapJets, Inc., ECF No. 661; Valhil Capital, LLC, ECF No. 722; Veri DAO, LLC, ECF No. 709; and XRP holders Jordan Deaton, James LaMonte, Mya LaMonte, Tyler LaMonte, Mitchell McKenna, and Kristiana Warner, ECF No. 708. [10] [9] Accredify, Inc. did not formally file an amicus brief after the Court granted leave to do so, see ECF No. 704, but included its brief as an attachment to its original request, see ECF No. 698 [10] On November 4, 2022, the Court directed that any requests to file amicus briefs be filed by November 11, 2022. ECF No. 695. William M. Cunningham and Anoop Bungay, both pro se litigants, each separately requested leave to file an amicus brief on November 16, 2022, and January 20, 2023, respectively. ECF Nos. 712, 807. Cunningham’s and Bungay’s requests are DENIED as untimely. Continue Reading . here About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case 1:20-cv-10832-AT-SN retrieved on September 7, 2023, from is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. dropbox

SEC v. Ripple: The Day the SEC Began Its Action

WINTER DREAMS

In 2007, the web standards project entered the scene once more to push Microsoft to build its most standards-compliant browser to date. A really special thanks to for all of her help writing this article, and with this project in general. Many thanks to you Molly, for your continued support and ongoing work with the web. Molly Holzschlag In late 2007, Molly Holzschlag was invited to sit down with Bill Gates at a Microsoft roundtable event. Holzschlag had met Gates the year prior, at a similar event, and they were there to discuss the same thing—web browesers and standards. The meeting was kept fairly short; each person was given only a single question. She was there representing the Web Standards Project (WaSP) in her role as project lead. WaSP had been working with Microsoft for several years, advocating for standards support in Internet Explorer that kept pace with the latest developments from the W3C. Internet Explorer 7, released a year prior, had been proof of a successful collaboration between Microsoft and the community of developers working on behalf of WaSP. Holzschlag, however, sensed that the communication between WaSP and Microsoft was slipping. As an outsider coming to the meeting, Holzschlag was in a unique position to push back on Microsoft and circumvent the internal politics of the largest tech company in the country. So when it was time for her question, she cut right to the chase. She explained that in the past six months, Microsoft had dropped some lines of communication that had been so instrumental in their previous collaborations, adding,: Because being the person here that’s supposed to be the liaison between designers and developers for the Web and the browser conversation, this conversation seems to have been pretty much shut down. Gates referred her to Dean Hachamovitch, general manager of the IE team, to talk through what kind of improvements were going to make it into Internet Explorer 8. Gates wanted to make sure that Holzschalg knew that this was only a temporary slip, and that her team and his would soon be on the same page. “I’ll look into it,” he promised. This was the CEO of Microsoft, a notoriously closed-off software company, guaranteeing that not only would web standards be a first class citizen in Internet Explorer 8, but transparency and collaboration were to the browser’s development. fundamental In order to understand how much things had changed at Microsoft—how important that level of transparency was—you need to go back several years, at the time when WaSP was created. A decade before that meeting, in the mid to late 1990’s, Microsoft and Netscape aggressively competed for browser market share, in what would later be called the . The two companies worked in isolation, Netscape on Navigator, and Microsoft on Internet Explorer, adding in proprietary features and moving further away from the standards and promise of an open web. Browser Wars Developers found themselves frustrated and caught in the middle of this conflict. A grassroots movement formed aimed at convincing browsers to more evenly support web technologies, especially the Document Object Model (DOM). They called themselves the Web Standards Project, or WaSP. Jeffrey Zeldman, leading the first iteration of the group, would often use a tactic referred to as the WaSP’s “string”—putting public pressure on browsers to adopt better standards and DOM support through scathing, public online editorials, and broad, relentless email campaigns. Microsoft was a frequent target. In 2001, Microsoft released Internet Explorer 6. Web standards began to change. The browser was, for the most part, celebrated by Zeldman and the Web Standards Project for better-than-average DOM and standards support. Over time, the organization leaned less on the WaSP’s sting, and shifted their focus from pressuring browsers to developer education and outreach. At least, that is, for a short while. , not too keen on learning from their past mistakes, decided that they had basically done their job. After the release of IE6, they shuffled engineers from the IE team to other places, and left only one or two people around to steer the ship. Microsoft The web platform, meanwhile, continued to move forward. A lot happened in just a few short years. The W3C was transitioning towards XHTML and new standards specifications. CSS, a relatively new technology when IE 6 was released, was being actively worked on at the W3C. Firefox, , released their standards-compliant open source browser. Opera, a constant advocate for web standards, was up to version 7, the first browser to introduce tabbed browsing. And both added some really impressive CSS support (even if their share of the market was small). an offshoot of Netscape Microsoft had nothing new to add to the conversation. IE 6, once a champion of web standards, once again fell behind, and was criticized for failing to catch up with modern web standards. With little to no movement in the browser in half a decade, many developers even began to blame Microsoft for holding the web back. Holzschlag had worked with the organization for years, primarily on CSS. In 2003, she was asked to help lead the project, along with co-lead Steve Champeon. She entered a world of rapidly evolving web specifications and genuine excitement from a growing community of web developers. Microsoft, however, remained a major hurdle and if the web were going to progress, Microsoft would need to come on board. At a time when it seemed that Microsoft and WaSP were deepening their trenches, all Holzschlag saw was a bridge. That outlook would end up having a huge impact on web standards. Rather than coordinate a strike against Microsoft, Holzschlag began meeting with members of the Internet Explorer team to see if there was anyway they could work together. To her surprise, they were delighted to meet with her. Though not widely known at the time, there were some employees inside Microsoft that had even begun to internally advocate for better standards support and a new version of the browser. Developers like Chris Wilson and Markus Mielke had been pushing their bosses to do better for a while now. But what they needed was a good push from the outside. Shortly after the introductions were made, WaSP set up the Microsoft Web Standards Project Task Force, an official statement of cooperation between WaSP and Microsoft. The web community had learned a lot about HTML and CSS from open source browsers like Opera and Firefox. But that standards support needed to make its way into IE. The task force worked with Microsoft, connecting directly with developers on their team, and advocating for better compliance with W3C standards in future versions of Internet Explorer. Not everyone agreed with the new direction of WaSP; there were supporters of standards that pushed back on cooperation with Microsoft. But Holzschlag knew that rivalry had led to stagnation. Cooperation might lead to progress. And Microsoft really did begin to open things up. They talked to the community and gathered feedback. Wilson and Mielke started a public blog, with dispatches from inside the Internet Explorer development team. With support from the outside—and now with at least some support also from within—that team Internet Explorer 7 in 2006, with better web standards compliance, a faster interface, and a brand new UI. Also in 2006, Holzschlag was invited to Microsoft’s annual all-hands Mix. She sat on a panel with other members from the web community, like Andy Clarke and Eric Meyer, along with members from the IE team. They spoke openly about the issues developers faced when working with their browser, and what could best be done in the future. The beta was already released for IE 7, but the team from Microsoft listened to this feedback and began working it into the next version. It was there that she met Bill Gates for the time. first Which brings us all the way back to 2007, when Holzschlag was invited back for the roundtable event—Microsoft Mix’n’Mash (this time with a slightly tighter group of engineers asking the questions)—with a question for Bill Gates that kicked off this post. In that period, after the release of Internet Explorer 7 and ahead of the Internet Explorer 8 launch, Microsoft’s browser team was passionate and ambitious. Many were representatives at the W3C. They knew what had to be done, but they needed approval from on high. Holzschlag applied some pressure with her question for Gates, pushing web standards back into the conversation. A lot had changed in ten years. now understood the importance of Internet Explorer, and of web standards. When Holzschlag posed her question, he responded to it directly. The culture surrounding Microsoft’s browser team really had changed. They were given freedom and support to work on technologies that wouldn’t just make Internet Explorer better, but would make the web better too. Bill Gates Over the next few years, that browser team would open up even more. In public announcements, and a in a growing blog penned by Wilson, Mielke and others on the IE team, Microsoft proved willing and able to collaborate with WaSP and standards-focused developers. The release of Internet Explorer 8 in 2009 proved that point. It had better compliance with W3C standards than any of its predecessors, including a more complete implementation of the DOM, better CSS support, and the inclusion of ARIA landmarks. It was an incredible change from the Microsoft that had released Internet Explorer 6 in 2001. Holzschlag eventually stepped down from her role as lead at WaSP and began consulting for Microsoft. Her work with the web, advocating for open access and web standards, has never stopped. Her time at WaSP was part of a web community that grew together towards a more standards-compliant future. This post introduced 2 milestones to the Timeline. Microsoft Web Standards Task Force July 5, 2005 Spearheaded by Molly Holzschlag, The Web Standards Projects creates a task force to help bring better web standards support to Microsoft's browser, Internet Explorer. Over the next few years, this group would provide Microsoft with guidance on how best to implement the latest HTML and CSS specifications. Internet Explorer 6 August 27, 2001 Microsoft releases Internet Explorer 6 bundled with Windows XP. The browser is fairly advance, features the latest web standards, and takes a large share of the market. However, the next version of IE would not be released for 5 years, and it soon fell behind its competitors. View the Full Timeline Sources Jen Simmons and Eric Meyer. "The Web Behind with Molly Holzschlag." The Web Ahead. November 11, 2012. http://thewebahead.net/41 Molly Holzschlag. "Conversation with Bill Gates About IE8 And Transparency." Molly. December 12, 2007. https://molly.com/2007/12/05/conversation-with-bill-gates-about-ie8-and-microsoft-transparency/ Phil Manchester. "Gates’ spontaneity highlights IE data gap." The Register. December 12, 2007. https://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/12/10/gates_ie8_fire_drill/ Molly Holzschlag. "Upcoming IE8: Interview with Bill Gates by Molly Holzschlag." Brainstorms and Raves. December 12, 2007. http://brainstormsandraves.com/archives/2007/12/06/ie8/ Bill Gates. "Blogger Roundtable." Liveside. December 12, 2007. http://www.liveside.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Transcript-Bill-Gates-Media-Roundtable.pdf Drew McLellan. "Change in Group Lead – The Web Standards Project." WaSP. December 12, 2006. https://www.webstandards.org/2006/12/20/change-in-group-lead/ "The Future of IE." Channel 9. April 4, 2006. https://channel9.msdn.com/Events/MIX/MIX06/NGW048 Molly Holzschlag. "Blogging is An Act of Courage." Molly. August 8, 2005. https://molly.com/2005/08/27/blogging-is-an-act-of-courage/ Paul Festa. "A standards truce in the browser war?." CNET. August 8, 2005. https://www.cnet.com/news/a-standards-truce-in-the-browser-war/ Molly Holzschlag. "Meeting Microsoft." Molly. July 7, 2005. https://molly.com/2005/07/21/meeting-microsoft/ Molly E. Holzschlag. "WaSP to Collaborate with Microsoft to Promote Web Standards." WaSP. July 7, 2005. https://www.webstandards.org/press/releases/2005-07-05/ Robert Lynch. "Even more on web standards." Robert's Random Ramblings. June 6, 2004. http://www.taitte-lynch.com/robert/2004/06/even-more-on-web-standards.html Jonathan Snook. "Mix’n’mash 2007." Snook. https://snook.ca/archives/conferences/mixnmash2007/ First Published . Here

The History of Internet Explorer and Web Standards

La historia de Internet Explorer y los estándares web

L'histoire d'Internet Explorer et des normes Web

इंटरनेट एक्सप्लोरर और वेब मानकों का इतिहास

Internet Explorer と Web 標準の歴史

A história do Internet Explorer e dos padrões da Web

Lịch sử của Internet Explorer và các tiêu chuẩn web

Internet Explorer 和 Web 标准的历史

In this post, I wanted to share a Reddit dataset list that gained a lot of traction on social media when it was first posted. Known as “the front page of the internet,” Reddit is part forum, part social media site, where users can post virtually anything and everything. Unlike Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram, the majority of Reddit users remain anonymous. Reddit moderators strictly censor and curate the subforums, known as subreddits. However, anonymity allows people to say what they want in whatever manner they wish. Therefore, Reddit comments and posts are perfect for testing and training numerous natural language processing (NLP) models. Some of the datasets below were compiled specifically for the training of content moderation models. Therefore, the data may include explicit content. Warning: Reddit Comments Datasets 1. – This dataset contains comments from the subreddit r/cryptocurrency. The data consists of comments posted over five months from November 2017 to March 2018. Cryptocurrency Reddit Comments Dataset 2. – A simple dataset containing thousands of comments crawled from Reddit that mention Donald Trump. Donald Trump Comments on Reddit 3. – This dataset was built to help create a model that can predict whether or not a Reddit comment will receive upvotes or downvotes. The dataset includes 4 million Reddit comments: 2 million poor-performing (downvoted) and 2 million high-performing (upvoted). Reddit Comment Score Prediction Reddit News Datasets 4. – As the title suggests, this dataset was originally made to create models that could predict stock market fluctuations. The data consists of news crawled from r/worldnews from June 2008 to July 2016, as well as Dow Jones Industrial Average stock data. Daily News for Stock Market Prediction 5. – Taken from the r/worldnews subreddit, this dataset contains info about all of the news posted on this subreddit dating back to 2008. The dataset includes the following info: date created, upvotes and downvotes, title, author, and whether or not the news contains mature content. World News on Reddit Other Data from Reddit 6. – This dataset contains the top 1,000 posts of all time from 18 subreddits, in terms of upvotes. For each post, the CSV files contain the title of the post and username of the poster. Additionally, the number of upvotes and downvotes, subreddit name, url, and other metadata has been included. Reddit’s Top 1000 7. – A simple dataset containing a CSV file of 26 million usernames of Reddit users. Furthermore, the dataset includes the total number of comments each user has made. Reddit Usernames 8. – This dataset consists of over 1.3 million sarcastic comments and posts crawled from Reddit. The dataset creator has labeled the sarcasm in each statement. In addition, the username of the poster, topic, and context is also included with each statement. SARC: Self-Annotated Reddit Corpus for Sarcasm 9. – This dataset contains over 140,000 acronyms found on subreddits about science, biology, technology, and futurology. The data is in the form of a CSV file which includes the comment ID, time, username, subreddit name, and the acronym mentioned. Science and Tech Acronyms from Reddit 10. – This product dataset is a collection of the top 100 Amazon products from every subreddit that has ever posted an Amazon product from 2015 to 2017. Each CSV file in the dataset includes the name of the product, category, and URL to the product. Furthermore, the total mentions on Reddit and total subreddit mentions have been included in the data. Things on Reddit (products) The datasets above could be used to help train sentiment analysis models, text classifiers, predictive models, and other NLP algorithms. For more datasets, please view our related resources. Also published on: https://lionbridge.ai/datasets/top-10-reddit-datasets-for-machine-learning/ Lead image via Erik Mclean on Unsplash

MARSH & MCLENNAN

mmc.com

10K+ employees

Since 1871

COMPANY RANKING

MARSH & MCLENNAN

EVERGREEN INDEX #7401

Representing this company? Click here to claim and customize this page!

Marsh & McLennan WIKI

Apply to get your Tech Company News Page live on HackerNoon.com today!

MARSH & MCLENNAN

mmc.com

10K+ employees

Since 1871

COMPANY RANKING

MARSH & MCLENNAN

EVERGREEN INDEX #7401

RELATED COMPANIESRANK

STORIES ABOUT MARSH & MCLENNAN

Representing this company? Click here to claim and customize this page!

Marsh & McLennan WIKI

Apply to get your Tech Company News Page live on HackerNoon.com today!