A method makes calculations with lots of numbers without describing their semantics A method makes calculations with lots of numbers without describing their semantics TL;DR: Avoid Magic numbers without explanation. You don't know their source and are very afraid of changing them. TL;DR: Avoid Magic numbers without explanation. You don't know their source and are very afraid of changing them. Problems 😔 Coupling
Low testability
Low readability Coupling Coupling Low testability Low readability Solutions 😃 Rename the constant with a semantic and name (meaningful and intention revealing).
Replace constants with parameters, so you can mock them from the outside.
The constant definition is often a different object than the constant (ab)user. Rename the constant with a semantic and name (meaningful and intention revealing). Replace constants with parameters, so you can mock them from the outside. Replace constants with parameters The constant definition is often a different object than the constant (ab)user. Refactorings ⚙️ https://hackernoon.com/improving-the-code-one-line-at-a-time?embedable=true https://hackernoon.com/improving-the-code-one-line-at-a-time?embedable=true https://hackernoon.com/refactoring-025-decompose-regular-expressions?embedable=true https://hackernoon.com/refactoring-025-decompose-regular-expressions?embedable=true Examples Algorithms Hyper Parameters Algorithms Hyper Parameters Context 💬 Magic numbers are literal values embedded directly into your code without explanation. They often appear in algorithms, configuration rules, or business logic as unexplained numeric values. At first, they might feel faster to write, but over time they turn into hidden assumptions that no one remembers. Future maintainers must guess their meaning, increasing the risk of errors when the values need to change. Constants help, but naming them meaningfully and placing them in the right context is what turns a magic number into a reliable, self-explanatory part of your code. Sample Code 📖 Wrong 🚫 <?

function energy($mass) {
    return $mass * (299792 ** 2)
} <?

function energy($mass) {
    return $mass * (299792 ** 2)
} Right 👉 # Storing magnitudes without units is another smell
class PhysicsConstants
   LIGHT_SPEED = 299792458.freeze
end

def energy(mass)
    mass * PhysicsConstants::LIGHT_SPEED ** 2
end # Storing magnitudes without units is another smell
class PhysicsConstants
   LIGHT_SPEED = 299792458.freeze
end

def energy(mass)
    mass * PhysicsConstants::LIGHT_SPEED ** 2
end Detection 🔍 Many linters can detect number literals in attributes and methods. Tags 🏷️ Declarative Code Declarative Code Level 🔋 Beginner Beginner Why the Bijection Is Important 🗺️ When you replace a magic number with a named constant, you create a bijection between the value and its meaning. bijection This one-to-one relationship ensures every numeric value has a clear, unambiguous purpose in your system. Without it, the same number could be reused for different reasons, leading to confusion and accidental coupling. A bijection between meaning and value makes the code easier to navigate, test, and evolve without fear of breaking unrelated parts. AI Generation 🤖 Large Language Models can introduce magic numbers when generating code, especially in examples or algorithm implementations. Treat AI-generated values with the same suspicion you would any human-written literal. Always check if the number is a placeholder, a real-world constant, or an algorithmic parameter, and replace it with a meaningful name before merging it into production code. AI Detection 🥃 Code reviewers should stay alert to magic numbers introduced by AI tools, which often lack context or semantic naming. Automated linters can flag number literals, but human insight is critical to understand if a value requires refactoring into a named constant. Keep your eyes open for AI-generated black box numbers that might slip past initial checks but can cause maintenance headaches later. Try Them! 🛠 Remember: AI Assistants make lots of mistakes Remember: AI Assistants make lots of mistakes Suggested Prompt: Convert it to more declarative Suggested Prompt: Convert it to more declarative Without Proper Instructions

With Specific Instructions



ChatGPT

ChatGPT



Claude

Claude



Perplexity

Perplexity



Copilot

Copilot



You

You



Gemini

Gemini



DeepSeek

DeepSeek



Meta AI

Meta AI



Grok

Grok



Qwen

Qwen Without Proper Instructions

With Specific Instructions



ChatGPT

ChatGPT



Claude

Claude



Perplexity

Perplexity



Copilot

Copilot



You

You



Gemini

Gemini



DeepSeek

DeepSeek



Meta AI

Meta AI



Grok

Grok



Qwen

Qwen Without Proper Instructions

With Specific Instructions Without Proper Instructions Without Proper Instructions With Specific Instructions With Specific Instructions ChatGPT

ChatGPT ChatGPT ChatGPT ChatGPT ChatGPT ChatGPT ChatGPT Claude

Claude Claude Claude Claude Claude Claude Claude Perplexity

Perplexity Perplexity Perplexity Perplexity Perplexity Perplexity Perplexity Copilot

Copilot Copilot Copilot Copilot Copilot Copilot Copilot You

You You You You You You You Gemini

Gemini Gemini Gemini Gemini Gemini Gemini Gemini DeepSeek

DeepSeek DeepSeek DeepSeek DeepSeek DeepSeek DeepSeek DeepSeek Meta AI

Meta AI Meta AI Meta AI Meta AI Meta AI Meta AI Meta AI Grok

Grok Grok Grok Grok Grok Grok Grok Qwen

Qwen Qwen Qwen Qwen Qwen Qwen Qwen Conclusion 🏁 You should address and remove your magic numbers to safeguard your code's readability, maintainability, and testability. Clear, semantic naming and decoupling constants from their consumers are essential steps toward crafting cleaner, more resilient software. Every magic number you replace with intention-revealing logic is a step away from brittle code and closer to robust, professional craftsmanship. Don't let numbers dictate your code; define their purpose and context instead. Relations 👩‍❤️‍💋‍👨 https://hackernoon.com/how-to-find-the-stinky-parts-of-your-code-part-xxxii https://hackernoon.com/how-to-find-the-stinky-parts-of-your-code-part-xxxii https://hackernoon.com/how-to-find-the-stinky-parts-of-your-code-part-xxvi https://hackernoon.com/how-to-find-the-stinky-parts-of-your-code-part-xxvi https://hackernoon.com/how-to-find-the-stinky-parts-of-your-code-part-ii-o96s3wl4 https://hackernoon.com/how-to-find-the-stinky-parts-of-your-code-part-ii-o96s3wl4 https://hackernoon.com/how-to-find-the-stinky-parts-of-your-code-part-xxxiii https://hackernoon.com/how-to-find-the-stinky-parts-of-your-code-part-xxxiii https://hackernoon.com/how-to-find-the-stinky-parts-of-your-code-part-xxxx https://hackernoon.com/how-to-find-the-stinky-parts-of-your-code-part-xxxx https://hackernoon.com/how-to-find-the-stinky-parts-of-your-code-part-xli https://hackernoon.com/how-to-find-the-stinky-parts-of-your-code-part-xli More Information 📕 https://refactoring.guru/es/replace-magic-number-with-symbolic-constant?embedable=true https://refactoring.guru/es/replace-magic-number-with-symbolic-constant?embedable=true https://hackernoon.com/how-to-decouple-a-legacy-system-zf153u42?embedable=true https://hackernoon.com/how-to-decouple-a-legacy-system-zf153u42?embedable=true Credits 🙏 Photo by Kristopher Roller on Unsplash Kristopher Roller Unsplash In a purely functional program, the value of a [constant] never changes, and yet, it changes all the time! A paradox! In a purely functional program, the value of a [constant] never changes, and yet, it changes all the time! A paradox! Joel Spolsky Joel Spolsky https://hackernoon.com/400-thought-provoking-software-engineering-quotes?embedable=true https://hackernoon.com/400-thought-provoking-software-engineering-quotes?embedable=true This article is part of the CodeSmell Series. https://hackernoon.com/how-to-find-the-stinky-parts-of-your-code-part-i-xqz3evd?embedable=true https://hackernoon.com/how-to-find-the-stinky-parts-of-your-code-part-i-xqz3evd?embedable=true

Every

Too Long; Didn't Read

Make resilience your competitive advantage

Code Smell 02 - Don’t Let Mysterious Numbers Rule Your Code

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

Untitled Story

From Helpful to Harmful: How AI Recommendations Destroyed My OS

India’s New Bill Puts Esports on Equal Footing with Cricket & Football

Michael Saylor's Legacy: The Bitcoin Corporate Revolution

Can ChatGPT Outperform the Market? Week 6

10 Influential Women in The AI Space

From Helpful to Harmful: How AI Recommendations Destroyed My OS

India’s New Bill Puts Esports on Equal Footing with Cricket & Football

Michael Saylor's Legacy: The Bitcoin Corporate Revolution

Can ChatGPT Outperform the Market? Week 6

10 Influential Women in The AI Space

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps