While we know the many benefits of going serverless -- reduced costs via pay-per-use pricing models, less operational burden/overhead, instant scalability, increased automation -- the challenges of going serverless are often not addressed as comprehensively. The understandable concerns over migrating can stop any and actions being made for fear of and . architectural decisions getting it wrong not having the right resources This article discusses the around along with . common concerns going serverless advice to minimize their impact If you'd like to learn more about the challenges of going serverless and other concepts more in-depth, make sure to check out our Knowledge Base. Security Risks Caused by Misconfiguration and Premature Deployment Misconfiguration and subsequent premature deployment is a when it comes to technology. Even though Serverless is a , and there are usually to take into account, you are still in charge of , just as in a traditional server-based infrastructure. As teams start to migrate, using new cloud applications until it's too late, their infrastructure is at risk of , Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks, and Man-in-the-Middle attacks, to name a few. genuine issue managed service fewer configuration concerns making your application secure without full insight into the deployment exposure to data leaks There have been plenty of stories over the years showing prominent organizations' , and various successful into their infrastructure. This leads to their customer base , not to mention the huge . On the other hand, have proved to be rather when it comes to security breaches. data breaches leaks security hacks questioning their reputation and security financial repercussions serverless infrastructures bullet-proof Learning any new language or skill requires mistakes to be made, but the key is to . There are plenty of resources and platforms available that check your infrastructure follows the correct security best practices. , letting it run in there for some time while using one of these platforms to cross-check. Once all prove successful and safe, you'll be confident when you deploy it into production. avoid having these mistakes create any true impact A simple method to check configurations is to deploy small and often into a test environment Dashbird analyses the , , and of cloud-native applications and reports back. You can find out in seconds against industry best practices. security efficiency posture, reliability how your infrastructure benchmarks Cost Efficiency for Prolonged Computing . For highly scaled applications with data-intensive workload processing requests, a is required to . Costs could spike unpredictably for an unforeseen increase in usage demands and may require organizations to tradeoff the traffic they can accommodate in a bid to reduce the IT expense. The longer the computing tasks run, the more you pay detailed cost analysis of usage-based serverless computing services ensure optimal cost efficiency Make sure to keep a close eye on AWS service costs. There are multiple ways to solve this issue; . Lambda's limitations got removed over the years, and . However, sometimes it can still be advisable to use a virtual machine or container. AWS Fargate tries to be the middle ground between function as a service and VMs: Serverless containers, so to say. This might be a better service for your long-running processes. the easiest solution is not to use Lambda for long-running processes at all the service is now more flexible than ever before The more complex solution requires you to . This can lead to faster invocations and even less money spent. Sadly, this isn't always possible, and you can't parallelize some processes, so Lambda isn't an option anymore. implement your process more distributed if possible, divide and conquer Additional Function and Microservice Calls Additional overhead is introduced to initiate compute requests with every function and microservice since the workloads may not reside on the same server instance. This information may be required to plan for an accurate total cost of ownership. Furthermore, has its that . Most serverless providers on how computing resources before it's . For instance, the execution time limit for Lambda is set at 15 minutes. If an API Gateway event invokes a Lambda function, this timeout is just 29 seconds. every server invocation inherent latency may impact app performance enforce time limits long the request can consume terminated AWS' services become better and better at direct integration with each other. API Gateway can write to DynamoDB directly, and with a VTL template, you can transform the request data to fit into your table without needing a Lambda function. This saves money and speeds up the transfer. If possible, try to cut out Lambda briding functions whenever possible. The same goes for AWS Step Functions; it can deliver its payload directly to many services already, removing the need for costly Lambda functions in-between. Observability lessens As we already know, and the main driver for . A common stumbling block for anyone new to serverless infrastructure is the , or rather the seemingly reduced visibility compared to what they were used to. insight is key architectural changes and improvements lack of visibility Serverless, by design, and is often stateless so having access to is the only way to . encourages event-based architecture logs and application traces understand any gaps in your infrastructure All public cloud platforms offer services to increase visibility and observability of your infrastructure; however, specialist monitoring platforms such as Dashbird can give further insight. , offer 3rd party integration for automated alerts, and seamlessly remain updated with any infrastructure changes. Such services make observability easier by providing intuitive dashboards that can drill down into detail should you need it These features offer full and comprehensive observability to a level that would be difficult to have in a default cloud-provider monitoring service such as AWS CloudWatch. Vendor Lock-in There is often a fear of when it comes to serverless, as the . The benefits of the cloud, such as hardware choices and upgrades, runtimes, and resource parameters, can also be seen as . In addition to this, once the infrastructure has been deployed and fully functioning, concerns are raised around and should users want to . losing control vendor determines management and application specifics over-reliance and inflexibility vendor lock-in limitations migrate later down the line As developers working within , to meet the needs of the business. While hardware choices are no longer down to the business, public cloud platforms and ways to work have come a long way to enable greater infrastructure autonomy. agile organizations architectural adaptability is crucial Looking at applications using and (DDB), hundreds of Lambda functions can interact with just a few DDB tables. If every Lambda queries using DDB standards -- this is programming to an implementation -- any database move will require an arduous change to each Lambda function. This is called AWS Lambda AWS DynamoDB A useful workaround is to create an interface that can translate general Lambda requests to the DDB query standards. programming to an interface. This change in programming will allow developers to that still understands the requests and can translate to the new database query language when they need to move out of AWS DDB. The interface can be for an even greater decoupling level. write a new interface deployed as a Lambda layer Distributed Computing With serverless comes the design for , where components are shared among multiple computers to . The challenge comes from but not too many to make it in the long term. Another consideration is to that their very benefit is eliminated. Instead, you have to contend with. distributed computing enable greater efficiency and performance creating a balance of granular functions for high performance unmanageable ensure that the functions aren't so high level or broad multiple mini monoliths When looking at examples of benefits and the distributed computing model, after the "I want that too" thoughts comes the "but how?!" It's important to keep clear that every organization . This sounds like straightforward advice, but it can get easily lost in the noise when starting or migrating entire builds into the cloud. large enterprises taking advantage of serverless started small and scaled The actor model is the second thing to keep in mind when thinking about your system and how each function will communicate. Limiting the actors to a set of functions such as creating other actors, sending messages, or deciding what to do with the next message will help avoid overwhelm and encourage a communicative environment. Opportunities of going serverless Now that we've gone through some of the challenges, we'd like to stress that the benefits of serverless are so vast that the operational and financial rewards could significantly outweigh the older, clunky and chunkier alternative making the switch highly valuable and incredibly worthy. Here are just some of the benefits of moving to serverless: An entire chain of manual infrastructure management processes is eliminated as users no longer need to coordinate and manage resources for increasingly distributed software components that constitute modern apps. Automated Infrastructure Management: The operational costs and time is reduced as no system administration processes are required to package and deploy the apps. Cost and Time Saving: The cost barrier to scale apps is also reduced as serverless IT workloads don't require dedicated resources. Every application request is met with continuous and independent scalability requirements, yet the users are charged only when requests are served. High Scalability and Optimized Resource Utilization: Since the application deployment process is (apparently) decoupled from the underlying infrastructure, Agile and DevOps-driven organizations are can maintain flexible IT operations and business processes. Due to hardware complexity and infrastructure configuration limitations, the constraints have less impact and role in dictating IT-driven business operations or app functionality. Agile teams can aim for faster development sprints and deploy iterative improvements or changing app functionality with fewer constraints. Truly Agile Business Processes: Services like AWS are inherently resilient and can guarantee performance SLAs most of the time. Serverless architecture offers the convenience of reducing the opportunities of hardware misconfigurations that potentially lead to performance degradation with traditional app deployment practices. Reliability and Performance: Conclusion Going serverless , and cause for confusion would be untruthful as there are plenty of unknowns in this now very accessible, fast-moving technology. With so many large organizations using it today who have the budget for vast resources and teams and yet are still subject to security breaches and architectural failures, the new serverless world can seem daunting and unworthy. comes with its challenges However, in equal measure to the many questions and concerns are their solutions and answers. The most prominent advice we can give from our own experience is to and , use a such as Dashbird to expand visibility, increase insights, continuously encourage and follow best practices, and throughout to . start and continue small for configurations deployment dedicated serverless observability platform keep simplicity avoid overly complex systems It won't be perfect straight away, but Rome wasn't built in a day either! Also published on . https://dashbird.io/blog/challenges-opportunities-going-serverless/