FTC v. Binance Court Filing, retrieved on March 27, 2023 is part of . You can jump to any part in this filing . This is part 23 of 31. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here VI. VIOLATIONS OF THE COMMODITY EXCHANGE ACT AND REGULATIONS COUNT I Violations of Section 4(a) of the Act, 7 U.S.C. § 6(a), or, alternatively, Section 4(b) of the Act, 7 U.S.C. § 6(b) and Regulation 48.3, 17 C.F.R. 48.3 (2022) Execution of Futures Transactions on an Unregistered Board of Trade 187. The allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 through 186 are re-alleged and incorporated herein by reference. 188. During the Relevant Period, Defendants Binance Holdings, Binance IE, and Binance Services, all acting as a common enterprise and doing business as Binance, and through their officers, employees, and agents, violated and are continuing to violate 7 U.S.C. § 6(a) by: a. offering to enter into retail commodity transactions, or contracts for the purchase or sale of digital assets that are commodities for future delivery; b. entering into retail commodity transactions, or contracts for the purchase or sale of digital assets that are commodities for future delivery; c. confirming the execution of retail commodity transactions, or contracts for the purchase or sale of digital assets that are commodities for future delivery; and d. conducting an office or business in the U.S. for the purpose of soliciting, or accepting any order for, or otherwise dealing in, any transaction in, or in connection with, retail commodity transactions or contracts for the purchase or sale of digital assets that are commodities for future delivery; without conducting its futures transactions on or subject to the rules of a board of trade that was designated or registered by the CFTC as a contract market. 189. Binance’s retail commodity transactions are and were offered, entered into on a leveraged or margined basis, or are and were financed by the offeror, the counterparty, or a person acting in concert with the offeror or counterparty on a similar basis. 190. Binance’s retail commodity transactions are and were offered to, entered into with persons who are not eligible contract participants or eligible commercial entities and who are not engaged in a line of business related to cryptocurrencies. 191. In the alternative, during the Relevant Period, Defendants Binance Holdings, Binance IE, and Binance Services, all acting as a common enterprise and doing business as Binance, and through their officers, employees, and agents, violated and are continuing to violate 7 U.S.C. § 6(b) and Regulation 48.3, 17 C.F.R. § 48.3 (2022), by permitting direct access to its electronic trading and order matching system without obtaining an Order of Registration for a foreign board of trade from the Commission. 192. Each offer to enter into, entrance into, execution of, and/or confirmation of the execution of illegal off exchange futures transactions, including, without limitation, those specifically alleged herein, is alleged as a separate and distinct violation of 7 U.S.C. § 6(a) or, alternatively, 7 U.S.C. § 6(b) and 17 C.F.R. § 48.3. 193. During the Relevant Period, Zhao directly or indirectly controlled Binance, and did not act in good faith or knowingly induced, directly or indirectly, the acts constituting Binance’s violations described in this Count. Therefore, pursuant to Section 13(b) of the Act, 7 U.S.C. § 13c(b), Zhao is liable as a control person for Binance’s violations described in this Count. 194. The acts and omissions of Zhao, Lim, and other officers, employees, or agents acting for Binance described in this Complaint were done within the scope of their office, employment, or agency with Binance. Therefore, pursuant to Section 2(a)(1)(B) of the Act, 7 U.S.C. § 2(a)(1)(B), and Regulation 1.2, 17 C.F.R. § 1.2 (2022), Binance is liable as a principal for each act, omission, or failure of the other officers, employees, or agents acting for Binance. 195. From July 2019 through at least January 2022 and while acting as Binance’s Chief Compliance Officer, Lim willfully aided, abetted, counseled, commanded, induced, or procured the acts constituting Binance’s violations described in this Count, or acted in combination or concert with any other person in any such violation, or willfully caused an act to be done or omitted which if directly performed or omitted by Lim or another would constitute a violation described in this Count. Pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Act, 7 U.S.C. § 13c(a), Lim is therefore liable for Binance’s violations described in this Count to the same extent as Binance. Continue Reading . Here About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case 1:23-cv-01887 retrieved on September 4, 2023, from is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. docdroid.net

Binance's CEA Violations - COUNT I: Execution of Transactions on an Unregistered Board of Trade

Too Long; Didn't Read

People Mentioned

@legalpdf

RELATED STORIES