Microsoft Accused of Sharing Copyrighted Works Without Attribution
by Legal PDF: Tech Court CasesAugust 15th, 2024
Too Long; Didn't Read
Count VII accuses Microsoft of violating 17 U.S.C. § 1202(b)(3) by providing copies of the plaintiff’s copyrighted works, lacking essential attribution details, to OpenAI. This occurred during the development of ChatGPT and Copilot.
The Center for Investigative Reporting Inc. v. OpenAI Court Filing, retrieved on June 27, 2024, is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This part is 17 of 18.
Count VII – Violation of 17 U.S.C. § 1202(b)(3) by Defendant Microsoft
158. The above paragraphs are incorporated by reference into this Count.
159. Upon information and belief, Defendant Microsoft shared copies of Plaintiff’s works without author, title, copyright notice, and terms of use information with the OpenAI Defendants in connection with the development of ChatGPT and Copilot.
Continue Reading Here.
About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.
This court case retrieved on June 27, 2024, motherjones.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction.
L O A D I N G
. . . comments & more!
. . . comments & more!
