Photo Credit, exponentialview on instagram.
š®š” In conversation with Yuval Harari on how the advances in genetic engineering and artificial intelligence will transform humans and human society. MUST LISTEN. Yuvalās excellent new book Homo Deus is now available in America. (Buy it here: UK | United States | Germany)
š Hello teamwork. āCognitive skills in topics like maths and English have long been used as to measure the calibre of a job candidateā¦non-cognitive skills are also integral to educational performance and success at workāāāand are becoming increasingly soā, says think-tank, The Hamilton Project. GOOD READ. See also George Monbiot exploring alternative models of education. And also, entrepreneur Mark Cuban argues for the coming increase in demand in liberal arts.
š¦ The great rebundler. Once internet business models were about unbundling. Today the reverse seems to be true. INSIGHTFUL.
š¤ Artificial intelligence has achieved much of its recent success by mimicking biology. Now it must go further. SUPER essay by @kellybclancy.
š Point (by Berit Anderson): Trumpās campaign team successfully-weaponised AI to provide better insights, more targeted messaging and rapid distribution of information. Counterpoint: Or maybe it wasnāt effective. The jury is still deliberating the real impact of the data-meets-social strategy used by the Trump and Brexit teams.
Sarah Tavelās āHierarchy of Engagementā is a GREAT READ for product entrepreneurs.
š„ Repost of Karl Polanyiās 1940 lecture: The Breakdown of The International system APPOSITE
One of the themes explored in my discussion with Yuval Harari was the move towards algorithmic management of the world. How, increasingly, algorithms make automated decisions in our everyday lives and in the deep bowels of business and the economy.
š Pew Research recently interviewed 1,302 experts on the impacts of algorithms on society in this rather excellent survey. The conclusions: algorithms will go everywhere and thatās mostly a good thing. But we need to be wary about losing our own decision-making prowess, guard against bias, manage filter bubbles and ensure we have oversight of those algorithms.
My take is that correctly designed, algorithmic decision-making will continue to be an incredible boon to human society. However, such algorithms needs to be holistically designed, which means understanding the wider context of a decision including any externalities arising from it. If āalgorithmic decisionsā are narrowly focused on efficiency for the operator of the algorithm, unintended consequences are likely to abound.
Wired magazine profiles Heliograf, a bot used by Washington Post to generate electoral stories:
In November 2012, it took four employees 25 hours to compile and post just a fraction of the election results manually. In November 2016, Heliograf created more than 500 articles, with little human intervention, that drew more than 500,000 clicks.
This is a far cry from 1995 when my then boss at The Guardian clamped together a bunch of scripts to autogenerate weather reports.
DeepMindās Pathnet has got AI researchers buzzing because it seems to be a precursor to the kind of architecture that could support artificial general intelligence (or AGI). Pathnet combines several hot areas of AI research in a single architecture: meta-learning, reinforcement learning, adversarial & cooperative learning and transfer learning. Carlos Perez has a reasonably accessible overview of it.
Adversarial examples are a datum that can force a machine learning system to make a mistake. Itās an intriguing area of cyber-security, especially as more decision making switches to algorithms. OpenAI has a nice paper on the subject.
Elsewhere:
The Economist reckons that electric vehicles are coming faster than we think. New forecasts doubled estimates for the penetration of battery EVs by 2030 to nearly 25%.
My take is that forecasts will soon be revised even further upwards. The historic 13-year replacement cycle for cars in the US (and similar in Europe), is going to come under real pressure are we move towards consumer acceptance, fleet ownership, autonomy and the vicious cycle for petrol-powered cars.
Elsewhere:
Ok. I didnāt write about Mark Zuckerbergās manifesto for saving the world. To be honest, I didnāt have time to read it (or the many critiques of it.) What I would say is that Iām glad heās starting to engage with some of the key issues that actually matter. Iāll hold assessment on the manifesto until I actually peruse it.
This week, Iām hoping to catch a few minutes at the demo day for Zeroth.ai, the Worldās First AI/ML Accelerator. (I occasionally help tak_lo, the founder.) Their investor/demo day will be live-streamed and there are only a few seats available. You can sign up to view here.
Have a great mid-February!
Ciao
Azeem
P.S. We have some cool things on our Instagram page.