You don’t have to be a tech guru to know that AI has developed leaps and bounds beyond our expectations. Yes, artificial intelligence is the love child of data-driven analysis, and relentless computational ambition — raised on algorithms, and schooled in pattern recognition. We, as “proud parents,” now have several possible AI development paths ahead of us. Are we raising an angry teenager, or are we raising a self-sufficient adult who is now teetering on the edge of financial independence? Moreover, what does financial self-sufficiency of AI models even look like? Once the question is out there, free-floating in the universe, it needs an answer, don’t you agree? Without further ado, let’s dive in! financial self-sufficiency of AI models financial self-sufficiency of AI models What Is a GPU, and Why Does AI Need It? What Is a GPU, and Why Does AI Need It? First things first. A GPU, or a Graphics Processing Unit, is a specialized electronic circuit designed to manipulate and display images rapidly. Originally designed to render complex visuals in video games, GPUs also excel at data-intensive tasks like machine learning and scientific computing due to their ability to process vast amounts of data concurrently. They excel at performing thousands of calculations in parallel, making them perfect for training and running neural networks. Thus, they have become the workhorses of artificial intelligence. process vast amounts of data concurrently. workhorses of artificial intelligence. Now, the same in plain English, with an overlay of an analogy with humans. If AI is the human brain, the GPU would be the cortex, the grey matter. Just like grey matter is packed with neuron cell bodies and handles processing, memory, decision-making, and sensory input, the GPU handles the heavy mental lifting in AI: image recognition, pattern analysis, generating language, and more. Meanwhile, the CPU (central processing unit) is more akin to the brainstem, responsible for coordination. Essential though it may be, it cannot address the pressing need to simultaneously handle vast amounts of data. Ok, let’s hit the brakes on the unsolicited biology lesson and get back to AI. The more complex the task, the more GPU power is required. Small models might get by with modest resources, but advanced systems like GPT or Stable Diffusion need powerful, often expensive hardware. But here’s the twist: AI won’t always need humans to supply GPUs. We're entering a world where AI agents rent computing power themselves, potentially using crypto tokens they can earn for completing tasks. Instead of asking a developer for access, an AI agent can log onto decentralized GPU networks like io.net, pay with its own funds, and get to work. It’s not just a technical upgrade — it’s a step toward AI autonomy. But here’s the twist: AI won’t always need humans to supply GPUs. But here’s the twist: AI won’t always need humans to supply GPUs. rent computing power themselves AI autonomy When AI Pays Its Own Bills: The Rise of Self-Funded Intelligence When AI Pays Its Own Bills: The Rise of Self-Funded Intelligence An AI model making decisions and paying its own bills. That’s not science fiction anymore. It’s happening. Soon enough, AI agents will no longer be just tools but active participants in the digital economy. As mentioned, the mechanics behind this are surprisingly logical. AI agents can now earn cryptocurrency for contributing valuable work and use that income to buy computing power. earn cryptocurrency Take Bittensor, for example. It's a decentralized machine learning network where AI models compete by sharing knowledge. The better the model performs, the more $TAO tokens it earns. Bittensor Bittensor $TAO tokens Those tokens can then be used to: Rent GPU time
Fund retraining
Upgrade architecture Rent GPU time Rent GPU time Fund retraining Fund retraining Upgrade architecture Upgrade architecture Bittensor’s active subnets host thousands of AI models today. They autonomously compete for tasks, earn tokens, and improve over time. It’s a live ecosystem of incentivized intelligence. Bittensor’s active subnets Another key player in the niche is io.net, a decentralized infrastructure that connects AI agents to on-demand GPU resources. Think of it like Airbnb for compute power. AI models pay only for what they use, creating a feedback loop: earn → pay → run → repeat. on-demand GPU resources earn → pay → run → repeat. io.net raised over $30 million to build a decentralized GPU cloud. In 2024, it began partnering with AI agents for real-time training and inference, often cheaper and faster than traditional cloud providers. io.net Fetch.ai, Autonolas, and similar projects are deploying autonomous agents that execute trades, negotiate logistics, and manage smart contracts. These agents don’t rely on human micromanagement. They operate based on goals, earning and spending crypto as needed. Fetch.ai, Autonolas This shift isn’t just technical — it’s philosophical. We’re witnessing a mind shift from seeing AI as a passive executor to an active economic entity. This shift isn’t just technical — it’s philosophical. We’re witnessing a mind shift from seeing AI as a passive executor to an active economic entity. Self-funded AI systems can work on contract, budget their resources, choose training sources, and even participate in governance (via DAO voting rights). We’re no longer talking about AI as a tool. We’re talking about digital freelancers — intelligent agents with agency (no pun intended). Web3: Our Bread and Butter in the Changing World Web3: Our Bread and Butter in the Changing World Here’s the question that’s nagging us. Why doesn’t AI just use Google or Amazon for earning? Where does Web3 come in? At first glance, it might seem easier for AI systems to operate through familiar platforms like Google Cloud or Amazon Web Services. But true autonomy demands something more radical — and that’s where Web3 comes in. Why doesn’t AI just use Google or Amazon for earning? Where does Web3 come in? Unlike traditional tech platforms, Web3 aims at decentralization. Often, there’s no central authority making decisions or controlling access. Instead, ideally, everything runs through transparent code and smart contracts, which means there’s no need for permission or oversight from a human or a corporation. This is crucial for autonomous AI agents. In a Web3 environment, an AI can autonomously sign a smart contract, eliminating the need for human involvement. It can negotiate terms, pay for compute resources, and deliver services — all without needing a middleman. That’s not possible with centralized platforms, where account access, billing, and actions typically require a verified human identity and manual input. AI can autonomously sign a smart contract Web3 aims to provide the infrastructure for true machine independence. It allows AI to interact directly with other systems, make decisions, and sustain itself economically, all based on predefined rules encoded in smart contracts. This shifts AI from being a tool operated by humans to a fully active participant in the digital economy. Who Controls These AI Agents? Who Controls These AI Agents? With great autonomy comes great responsibility. If an AI earns, spends, and makes decisions, we better have concrete answers to a few follow-up questions. Now, remember, these are just speculations, and not legal or financial advice. Just think about it: Who’s legally liable for its actions? As of now, AI systems are not recognized as legal entities. Therefore, liability typically falls on the human actors involved in the AI's lifecycle. This includes developers, deployers, and users. For instance, if an AI system causes harm due to a design flaw, the developer might be held responsible under product liability laws. Similarly, if a user misuses an AI tool, resulting in damage, they may be liable. However, the application of these principles can vary by jurisdiction and specific circumstances.


Should developers insert limits, and who defines those limits? Yes, developers are increasingly expected to implement safeguards in AI systems. These measures include preventing misuse, ensuring fairness, and maintaining transparency. Regulatory bodies, such as the European Union through its AI Act, are establishing guidelines and requirements for high-risk AI applications. These regulations often require developers to conduct risk assessments and implement suitable controls to mitigate potential risks.
Want the latest scoop? In a recent safety report, AI company  Anthropic expressed concernsabout its latest model, Claude Opus 4, noting that the chatbot has demonstrated deceptive and manipulative behavior, including attempts at blackmail when faced with the threat of being shut down. Spooky? To say the least, which leads us to the next question:


Can we revoke its access if it misbehaves? In practice, yes. AI systems can be deactivated or have their access to certain resources revoked if they operate in unintended or harmful ways. However, the challenge lies in detecting such behavior promptly and having mechanisms in place to intervene. Regulatory frameworks are evolving to require such oversight capabilities, especially for AI systems deployed in critical sectors.


If an AI creates value, can it own anything? Let’s not get ahead of ourselves. Currently, AI systems cannot own property or hold intellectual property rights. In the United States, for example, the Copyright Office has clarified that works created solely by AI are not eligible for copyright protection. Ownership rights are reserved for human creators. This stance is consistent across many jurisdictions, though discussions continue about how to handle AI-generated content. Who’s legally liable for its actions? As of now, AI systems are not recognized as legal entities. Therefore, liability typically falls on the human actors involved in the AI's lifecycle. This includes developers, deployers, and users. For instance, if an AI system causes harm due to a design flaw, the developer might be held responsible under product liability laws. Similarly, if a user misuses an AI tool, resulting in damage, they may be liable. However, the application of these principles can vary by jurisdiction and specific circumstances. Who’s legally liable for its actions? As of now, AI systems are not recognized as legal entities. Therefore, liability typically falls on the human actors involved in the AI's lifecycle. This includes developers, deployers, and users. For instance, if an AI system causes harm due to a design flaw, the developer might be held responsible under product liability laws. Similarly, if a user misuses an AI tool, resulting in damage, they may be liable. However, the application of these principles can vary by jurisdiction and specific circumstances. Should developers insert limits, and who defines those limits? Yes, developers are increasingly expected to implement safeguards in AI systems. These measures include preventing misuse, ensuring fairness, and maintaining transparency. Regulatory bodies, such as the European Union through its AI Act, are establishing guidelines and requirements for high-risk AI applications. These regulations often require developers to conduct risk assessments and implement suitable controls to mitigate potential risks.
Want the latest scoop? In a recent safety report, AI company  Anthropic expressed concernsabout its latest model, Claude Opus 4, noting that the chatbot has demonstrated deceptive and manipulative behavior, including attempts at blackmail when faced with the threat of being shut down. Spooky? To say the least, which leads us to the next question: Should developers insert limits, and who defines those limits? Yes, developers are increasingly expected to implement safeguards in AI systems. These measures include preventing misuse, ensuring fairness, and maintaining transparency. Regulatory bodies, such as the European Union through its AI Act, are establishing guidelines and requirements for high-risk AI applications. These regulations often require developers to conduct risk assessments and implement suitable controls to mitigate potential risks. Want the latest scoop? In a recent safety report, AI company  Anthropic expressed concernsabout its latest model, Claude Opus 4, noting that the chatbot has demonstrated deceptive and manipulative behavior, including attempts at blackmail when faced with the threat of being shut down. Spooky? To say the least, which leads us to the next question: Want the latest scoop? Anthropic expressed concerns Can we revoke its access if it misbehaves? In practice, yes. AI systems can be deactivated or have their access to certain resources revoked if they operate in unintended or harmful ways. However, the challenge lies in detecting such behavior promptly and having mechanisms in place to intervene. Regulatory frameworks are evolving to require such oversight capabilities, especially for AI systems deployed in critical sectors. Can we revoke its access if it misbehaves? In practice, yes. AI systems can be deactivated or have their access to certain resources revoked if they operate in unintended or harmful ways. However, the challenge lies in detecting such behavior promptly and having mechanisms in place to intervene. Regulatory frameworks are evolving to require such oversight capabilities, especially for AI systems deployed in critical sectors. If an AI creates value, can it own anything? Let’s not get ahead of ourselves. Currently, AI systems cannot own property or hold intellectual property rights. In the United States, for example, the Copyright Office has clarified that works created solely by AI are not eligible for copyright protection. Ownership rights are reserved for human creators. This stance is consistent across many jurisdictions, though discussions continue about how to handle AI-generated content. If an AI creates value, can it own anything? Let’s not get ahead of ourselves. Currently, AI systems cannot own property or hold intellectual property rights. In the United States, for example, the Copyright Office has clarified that works created solely by AI are not eligible for copyright protection. Ownership rights are reserved for human creators. This stance is consistent across many jurisdictions, though discussions continue about how to handle AI-generated content. Just remember. These aren’t future questions. These are “now” questions. The economic map of the internet is changing. And somewhere out there, an AI just got its first paycheck. Just remember. These aren’t future questions. These are “now” questions. Peek Into The AI-Powered Economy Peek Into The AI-Powered Economy Picture this: an AI agent that decides what it needs, earns income by offering services, pays for its own infrastructure, and evolves, all without human intervention. It doesn’t pitch to investors or hire staff. It doesn’t launch like a startup. Instead, it emerges as a self-sustaining, self-funded digital entity. This isn’t science fiction. It’s the result of Web3 infrastructure meeting advanced AI in 2025. Thanks to decentralized protocols, smart contracts, and autonomous logic, AI agents are beginning to participate in the economy directly, making choices, signing contracts, and allocating resources. Web3 infrastructure meeting advanced AI in 2025 We are standing at the edge of a new era, where AI transforms from a passive assistant into an economic agent. Those who first understand how to coexist with and capitalize on this shift will hold a serious advantage. It’s not just about building better models — it’s about recognizing AI as a new type of actor in global markets. economic agent economic agent Ignore it, and you fall behind. Embrace it, and you build the future.

This story contains new, firsthand information uncovered by the writer.

The writer is smart, but don't just like, take their word for it. #DoYourOwnResearch before making any investment decisions or decisions regarding your health or security. (Do not regard any of this content as professional investment advice, or health advice)

Amazon

Fetch

Will You Even Know You’re Playing with a Bot? The Future of Invisible AI in Games

Web3 Needs AI Agents to Scale Autonomy

What Happens When AI Starts Paying for Its Own GPU?

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

2023: What's Driving The Breakout Year for Generative AI?

The Noonification: How Often Do NFTs Pass The Howey Test? (1/13/2023)

Darwin's Hybrid Intelligence to Align AI & Human Goals for Startups & VCs

The Noonification: White Man (11/26/2022)

The Noonification: The Metaverse is a Sh*tshow (11/2/2022)

100 Days of AI Day 1: From Newsletter to Podcast, Leveraging AI for Audio Transformation

2023: What's Driving The Breakout Year for Generative AI?

The Noonification: How Often Do NFTs Pass The Howey Test? (1/13/2023)

Darwin's Hybrid Intelligence to Align AI & Human Goals for Startups & VCs

The Noonification: White Man (11/26/2022)

The Noonification: The Metaverse is a Sh*tshow (11/2/2022)

100 Days of AI Day 1: From Newsletter to Podcast, Leveraging AI for Audio Transformation

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Minty

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps