Authors:
(1) Antonio Riotto, Département de Physique Theorique, Universite de Geneve, 24 quai Ansermet, CH-1211 Geneve 4, Switzerland and Gravitational Wave Science Center (GWSC), Universite de Geneve, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland;
(2) Joe Silk, Institut d’Astrophysique, UMR 7095 CNRS, Sorbonne Universite, 98bis Bd Arago, 75014 Paris, France, Department of Physics and Astronomy, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore MD 21218, USA, and Beecroft Institute of Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RH, UK. Table of Links Abstract and 1 Introduction 2 Some open questions 2.1 What is the abundance of PBHs? 2.2 What is the effect of PBH clustering? 2.3 What fraction of the currently observed GW events can be ascribed to PBHs? 2.4 Are PBHs the Dark Matter? 3 The PBH Roadmap 3.1 High redshift mergers 3.2 Sub-solar PBHs 3.3 Plugging the pair instability gap with PBH? 3.4 PBH eccentricity, 3.5 PBH spin and 3.6 Future gamma-ray telescopes 4 Conclusions and References 2.3 What fraction of the currently observed GW events can be ascribed to PBHs? Thanks to the many binary BH events detected so far with many more expected in the next few years, gravitational-wave astronomy is about to become a population study. Currently hierarchical Bayesian analysis combining astrophysical formation models and PBHs may only constrain the fraction of a putative subpopulation of PBHs in the data (see for instance Ref. [13]). The exciting possibility that PBHs are contributing to current observations will be verified only by further reducing uncertainties in astrophysical and primordial formation models. This is another fundamental open issue. This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY 4.0 DEED license. Authors: (1) Antonio Riotto, Département de Physique Theorique, Universite de Geneve, 24 quai Ansermet, CH-1211 Geneve 4, Switzerland and Gravitational Wave Science Center (GWSC), Universite de Geneve, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland; (2) Joe Silk, Institut d’Astrophysique, UMR 7095 CNRS, Sorbonne Universite, 98bis Bd Arago, 75014 Paris, France, Department of Physics and Astronomy, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore MD 21218, USA, and Beecroft Institute of Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RH, UK. Authors: Authors: (1) Antonio Riotto, Département de Physique Theorique, Universite de Geneve, 24 quai Ansermet, CH-1211 Geneve 4, Switzerland and Gravitational Wave Science Center (GWSC), Universite de Geneve, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland; (2) Joe Silk, Institut d’Astrophysique, UMR 7095 CNRS, Sorbonne Universite, 98bis Bd Arago, 75014 Paris, France, Department of Physics and Astronomy, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore MD 21218, USA, and Beecroft Institute of Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RH, UK. Table of Links Abstract and 1 Introduction Abstract and 1 Introduction 2 Some open questions 2 Some open questions 2.1 What is the abundance of PBHs? 2.1 What is the abundance of PBHs? 2.2 What is the effect of PBH clustering? 2.2 What is the effect of PBH clustering? 2.3 What fraction of the currently observed GW events can be ascribed to PBHs? 2.3 What fraction of the currently observed GW events can be ascribed to PBHs? 2.4 Are PBHs the Dark Matter? 2.4 Are PBHs the Dark Matter? 3 The PBH Roadmap 3 The PBH Roadmap 3.1 High redshift mergers 3.1 High redshift mergers 3.2 Sub-solar PBHs 3.2 Sub-solar PBHs 3.3 Plugging the pair instability gap with PBH? 3.3 Plugging the pair instability gap with PBH? 3.4 PBH eccentricity, 3.5 PBH spin and 3.6 Future gamma-ray telescopes 3.4 PBH eccentricity, 3.5 PBH spin and 3.6 Future gamma-ray telescopes 4 Conclusions and References 4 Conclusions and References 2.3 What fraction of the currently observed GW events can be ascribed to PBHs? Thanks to the many binary BH events detected so far with many more expected in the next few years, gravitational-wave astronomy is about to become a population study. Currently hierarchical Bayesian analysis combining astrophysical formation models and PBHs may only constrain the fraction of a putative subpopulation of PBHs in the data (see for instance Ref. [13]). The exciting possibility that PBHs are contributing to current observations will be verified only by further reducing uncertainties in astrophysical and primordial formation models. This is another fundamental open issue. This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY 4.0 DEED license. This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY 4.0 DEED license. available on arxiv

Part of HackerNoon's growing list of open-source research papers, promoting free access to academic material.

What Fraction of the Currently Observed GW Events Can Be Ascribed to PBHs?

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

Untitled Story

A Phenomenological Study: Discussing the Relevant Theoretical and Experimental Constraints

The Future of Primordial Black Holes: Open Questions and Roadmap

Open Questions on the Future of Primordial Black Holes

The Elusive Abundance of Primordial Black Holes

What Is the Effect of PBH Clustering?

A Phenomenological Study: Discussing the Relevant Theoretical and Experimental Constraints

The Future of Primordial Black Holes: Open Questions and Roadmap

Open Questions on the Future of Primordial Black Holes

The Elusive Abundance of Primordial Black Holes

What Is the Effect of PBH Clustering?

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps