DOE v. Github (original complaint) Court Filing, retrieved on November 3, 2022 is part of You can jump to any part in this filing . This is part 29 of 37. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. here VIII. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF COUNT VI UNJUST ENRICHMENT Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 17200, et seq. and Common Law (GitHub and OpenAI) 200. Plaintiffs and the Class hereby repeat and incorporate by reference each preceding and succeeding paragraph as though fully set forth herein. 201. Plaintiffs and the Class have invested substantial time and energy in creating the Licensed Materials. 202. GitHub and OpenAI have unjustly utilized access to Licensed Materials hosted on GitHub. This code is used to create Derivative Works that are licensed to third parties in exchange for, inter alia, compliance with applicable License terms. 203. GitHub and OpenAI derive profit or other benefits from removal of attribution, copyright notices, and license terms from Licensed Materials and reselling it as Output through Copilot. 204. It would be unjust for GitHub and OpenAI to retain those benefits. 205. Plaintiffs and the Class have suffered monetary damages as a result of GitHub’s and OpenAI’s conduct. 206. The conduct of GitHub and OpenAI is causing and, unless enjoined and restrained by this Court, will continue to cause Plaintiffs and the Class great and irreparable injury that cannot fully be compensated or measured in money. Continue Reading . Here About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case 3:22-cv-06823-KAW retrieved on September 5, 2023, from is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. Storage.Courtlistener

Unjust Enrichment Allegations: GitHub and OpenAI Under Fire

Too Long; Didn't Read

@legalpdf

RELATED STORIES