Twitter v. Elon Musk Court Filing by Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, July 12, 2022 is part of . You can jump to any part in this filing . This is part 11 of 31. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here Feature Image: HackerNoon’s Midjourney AI, Prompt ‘Non-Disparagement’ FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS III - The Final, Agreed-upon Term Deals E. Public Statements and Non-Disparagement 52. Section 6.8 of the agreement contains standard language requiring each side to consult with the other before issuing certain public statements, as well as negotiated language concerning Musk’s ability to Tweet about the merger. Under the provision, Musk may so Tweet only “so long as such Tweets do not disparage the Company or any of its Representatives.” Id. § 6.8. Continue reading here