FTC v. Binance Court Filing, retrieved on March 27, 2023 is part of . You can jump to any part in this filing . This is part 30 of 31. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here VII. RELIEF REQUESTED , the Commission respectfully requests that the Court, as authorized by Section 6c of the Act, 7 U.S.C. § 13a-l, and pursuant to the Court’s own equitable powers, enter: WHEREFORE A. An order finding that Defendants Binance Holdings Limited, Binance Holdings (IE) Limited, and Binance (Services) Holdings Limited, collectively doing business as Binance, and through their officers, employees, and agents, including without limitation Zhao, violated Section 4(a) of the Act, 7 U.S.C. § 6(a) (or, in the alternative, Section 4(b) of the Act, 7 U.S.C. § 6(b), and Regulation 48.3, 17 C.F.R. 48.3 (2022)); Section 4c(b) of the Act, 7 U.S.C. § 6c(b), and Regulation 32.2, 17 C.F.R. § 32.2 (2022); Section 4d of the Act, 7 U.S.C. § 6d; Section 5h(a)(1) of the Act, 7 U.S.C. § 7b-3(1), and Regulation 37.3(a)(1), 17 C.F.R. § 37.3(a)(1) (2022); Regulation 166.3, 17 C.F.R. § 166.3 (2022); Regulation 42.2, 17 C.F.R. § 42.2 (2022); and Regulation 1.6(a), 17 C.F.R. § 1.6(a) (2022); finding that Changpeng Zhao is liable for Binance’s aforementioned violations as a control person pursuant to Section 13(b) of the Act, 7 U.S.C. § 13c(b), and for violating Regulation 1.6(a); and further finding that Samuel Lim is liable for aiding and abetting Binance’s aforementioned violations pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Act, 7 U.S.C. § 13c(a), and for violating Regulation 1.6(a). B. An order of permanent injunction prohibiting Defendants and any other person or entity associated with them, from engaging in conduct described above, in violation of 7 U.S.C. §§ 6(a) (or in the alternative 6(b) and 17 C.F.R. 48.3), 6c(b), 6d, and 7b-3(1), and 17 C.F.R. §§ 1.6(a), 32.2, 37.3(a)(1), 42.2, and 166.3. C. An order of permanent injunction prohibiting Defendants and any of their affiliates, officers, agents, employees, successors, assigns, attorneys, and persons in active concert or participation with Defendants, from directly or indirectly: (i) trading on or subject to the rules of any registered entity (as that term is defined in Section la of the Act, 7 U.S.C. § la(40)); (ii) entering into any transactions involving “commodity interests” (as that term is defined in Regulation 1.3, 17 C.F.R. § 1.3 (2022)) and/or digital asset commodities as defined herein, for Defendants’ own accounts or for any account in which they have a direct or indirect interest; (iii) having any commodity interests and/or digital asset commodities as defined herein traded on Defendants’ behalf; (iv) controlling or directing the trading for or on behalf of any other person or entity, whether by power of attorney or otherwise, in any account involving commodity interests and/or digital asset commodities as defined herein; (v) soliciting, receiving, or accepting any funds from any person for the purpose of purchasing or selling any commodity interests and/or digital asset commodities as defined herein; (vi) applying for registration or claiming exemption from registration with the Commission in any capacity, and engaging in any activity requiring such registration or exemption from registration with the Commission, except as provided for in Regulation 4.14(a)(9), 17 C.F.R. § 4.14(a)(9) (2022); and (vii) acting as a principal (as that term is defined in Regulation 3.1(a), 17 C.F.R. § 3.1(a) (2022)), agent or any other officer or employee of any person registered, exempted from registration or required to be registered with the Commission except as provided for in Regulation 4.14(a)(9); D. An order directing Defendants and any third party transferee and/or successors thereof, to disgorge to any officer appointed or directed by the Court all benefits received including, but not limited to, trading profits, revenues, salaries, commissions, loans, or fees derived, directly or indirectly, from acts or practices which constitute violations of the Act as described herein, including pre-judgment and post-judgment interest; E. An order directing Defendants and any successors thereof, to rescind, pursuant to such procedures as the Court may order, all contracts and agreements, whether implied or express, entered into between, with, or among Defendants and any customer or investor whose funds were received by Defendants a result of the acts and practices that constituted violations of the Act, as described herein; F. An order requiring Defendants to make full restitution by making whole each and every customer or investor whose funds were received or utilized by them in violation of the provisions of the Act as described herein, including pre-judgment interest; G. An order directing Defendants to pay civil monetary penalties, to be assessed by the Court, in an amount not more than the penalty prescribed by Section 6c(d)(1) of the Act, 7 U.S.C. § 13a-1(d)(1), as adjusted for inflation pursuant to the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015, Pub. L. 114–74, tit. VII, § 701, 129 Stat. 584, 599- 600, see Regulation 143.8, 17 C.F.R. § 143.8 (2022), for each violation of the Act, as described herein; H. An order requiring Defendants to pay costs and fees as permitted by 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920 and 2412(a)(2); and I. Such other and further relief as the Court deems proper. Continue Reading . Here About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case 1:23-cv-01887 retrieved on September 4, 2023, from is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. docdroid.net

The Commission's Fight to Tame Binance

Too Long; Didn't Read

People Mentioned

@legalpdf

RELATED STORIES