Three months back, I caught myself at 3:47 AM staring at my phone, fifteen TikToks deep into people's dramatic job-quitting videos. I'd opened the app "for just a second" somewhere around midnight. Nearly three hours vanished into an algorithmic void designed specifically to do exactly that. I'm not special. This is the business model. The attention economy has turned us into inventory. We're human eyeballs, packaged and sold to advertisers at scale. And business? It's doing incredibly well. Meta brought in $164.5 billion in 2024, up 22% from 2023. Just their fourth quarter pulled in $48.4 billion, with profits jumping 49% to $20.8 billion. Instagram alone is expected to generate over $32 billion in U.S. ad revenue this year, accounting for more than half of Meta's domestic ad sales for the first time. These aren't just impressive numbers. They're the dollar value of our collective consciousness. The Five-Second Hijack Netflix figured out something clever years ago: if you let people think for even a moment, they might actually stop watching. So the next episode starts in five seconds unless you interrupt it. Five seconds. That's barely enough time to find the remote, let alone decide whether you really want to spend another 45 minutes watching strangers bake cakes. A University of Chicago study from 2024 found something interesting: when people turned off autoplay, they watched about 18 minutes less per session. One guy said it was the first time he actually noticed how many episodes he'd been burning through. When the platform makes the choice for you, you don't even register it. Eighteen minutes. That's how much of your life Netflix reclaims just by making you press one button. The researchers called autoplay a "dark pattern," interface design that manipulates users into doing what benefits the platform, not themselves. It's hardly enough time for viewers to consider their original intentions, they noted. Netflix minimizes friction so opportunities for consumers to deviate are few and far between. In plain English: they engineer out your ability to say no. The Algorithm Knows You Better Than You Do Mark Zuckerberg has been remarkably candid about what Meta is building. In 2024, he described an all-in-one AI ad tool where businesses just say what they want (more customers, more sales, whatever), deposit money, and Meta "just delivers as many results as we can." The company can spin up 4,000 different versions of a single ad and test which one works best on you. Millions of advertisers now use Meta's generative AI tools to create images, videos, and text engineered to grab your attention. Every swipe teaches the algorithm. Every pause refines the model. Every time you linger on a video for three seconds instead of two, the system learns something new about manipulating your attention. The algorithm isn't a recommendation engine. It's a pickpocket with years of practice. By late 2024, Instagram was pulling in $223 per U.S. user each year in ad revenue. Facebook brought in $191 per user. These aren't just metrics. They're the dollar value the market has assigned to your eyeballs. As one tech columnist put it bluntly: if it wasn't clear before that users are the product and advertisers are the customers, it's about to become crystal. Training Ourselves Into Goldfish I spent weeks going through recent studies on TikTok's cognitive effects. The results hit harder than I anticipated. A January 2025 study found that TikTok's fast pace and endless stimulation is actually shrinking attention spans. Students can't focus on tasks that require sustained concentration anymore. Most struggle to pay attention to schoolwork for more than 10 minutes. Elementary school kids have trouble sitting through assemblies now. The mechanism is straightforward: TikTok's interface delivers short bursts of thrills through infinite scroll. Your brain adapts to constant novelty. Then when you try reading something longer or sitting through a lecture, your prefrontal cortex (the part that handles sustained focus) struggles with the slower pace. Michael Manos, who runs the Center for Attention and Learning at Cleveland Clinic Children's, explained it in simple terms: directed attention is basically your ability to tune out distractions and stay focused. It takes planning and prioritizing. Kids struggle with this naturally because their prefrontal cortex isn't fully developed until around age 25. But throw TikTok into the mix, with its constantly changing content, and they lose the ability to handle anything slower-paced in the real world. A Microsoft study from 2024 found that spending just 20 minutes on TikTok measurably drops your attention span and working memory. Twenty minutes. That's it. Your ability to focus and remember takes a measurable hit after less time than it takes to watch a sitcom episode. Over 60% of TikTok-using teens report difficulty maintaining focus in school or while reading, according to a 2022 Statistic survey that's only become more relevant as the platform's user base has exploded. Students admit they can't watch even a one-minute video anymore. Their brains crave constant novelty and instant payoffs. One Australian teenager put it bluntly to researchers: "TikTok has made my attention span so low that I can't even watch a one-minute video." Let that sink in. A platform known for short videos has trained brains so thoroughly that even its own content feels too long. The Dopamine Marketplace Yale psychiatrist Marc Potenza's research found that watching personalized TikTok videos fires up the brain's reward system the same way money, food, and other pleasurable things do. The critical factor here is "personalized." The algorithm-selected video drives a higher dopamine surge than a random one. This isn't accidental. It's the product. TikTok removes the decision-making process entirely. You don't choose what to watch; videos just appear. For your brain, this lack of choice triggers a reward response. It's classical conditioning on steroids: open app, get reward. The randomness makes it worse. You never know when the next perfect video will show up, so you keep swiping. We're not scrolling feeds. The feeds are scrolling us. The effects ripple beyond the app. Stanford researchers found that watching short clips lowers self-control and makes behaviour more impulsive overall. Another study showed TikTok users are more prone to "phubbing" (snubbing real people to stare at their phones) than users of other platforms. We've essentially outsourced our sense of when to stop to user interfaces designed by people whose bonuses depend on us never stopping. The Hidden Tax The personal costs are mounting. Harvard health experts warn that doomscrolling (endless swiping through bad news) is a form of chronic stress that can literally sicken people. One 2024 study reported higher "existential anxiety" in frequent doomscrollers. Another review found more doomscrolling linked to worse well-being and lower life satisfaction. Long stretches staring at screens can give you what experts call "popcorn brain," the feeling that your head is bursting with random images and emotions, making it hard to focus on anything slower or subtler in real life. An Ohio State survey showed that only 25% of people say they don't have focus problems. Almost a third blame their phones, though stress and anxiety ranked higher. For kids and teens, it's particularly bad. A 2025 international study found 68% of teenagers admit social media is already messing with their ability to concentrate. They're right. Their brains are being trained to reject anything that requires sustained attention. But the damage extends beyond individual burnout. When algorithms optimize for engagement, they push sensationalism over sanity. We stop being active thinkers and become surveillance subjects, ripe for manipulation. The more we scroll, the more Big Tech sets our emotional agenda. And the companies barely hesitate to follow that playbook, because more engagement equals more ad revenue, whether or not it's good for our brains (or our democracy). Breaking the Spell Last year, I deleted TikTok, X, and Facebook from my phone's home screen. I started leaving my phone at home during walks. I fast from screens during dinner with friends and family. It felt ridiculous at first. Like an alcoholic avoiding bars. But that's exactly the point. These apps are designed to be addictive, and addiction requires deliberate countermeasures. Resistance Toolkit If you want to fight back without going full digital hermit, start here: Move social apps off your home screen. The extra friction of searching for them gives your brain time to ask "do I actually want this?" Move social apps off your home screen. Kill autoplay everywhere you can. Netflix, YouTube, TikTok. Turn it all off. Make yourself press play. Kill autoplay everywhere you can. Install blockers before your willpower fails. Freedom, StayFocusd, or Apple's Screen Time. Lock yourself out during work hours or after 9 PM. Install blockers before your willpower fails. Treat boredom as a muscle, not a weakness. Your brain needs downtime to process, create, and rest. The discomfort of waiting in line without your phone is the feeling of your attention span healing. Treat boredom as a muscle, not a weakness. Schedule device-free zones. Dinner table. First hour after waking. Conversations with friends. Make these spaces sacred again. Schedule device-free zones. Researchers from Nanyang Tech and ListenLabs are pushing for tech companies to redesign for well-being. They suggest default "scroll breaks," on-screen time cues, and "attention-aware interface" features that force users out of the trance. Make the phone occasionally ask: "Do you really want to keep scrolling?" Facebook and YouTube have dabbled in these features. Mostly as window dressing while they optimize everything else for maximum engagement. Some larger shifts are happening. Mindfulness advocates encourage relearning boredom. Even short, device-free breaks boost creativity and focus more than half a day of distracted multitasking. A few schools and parents push phone curfews. Some companies forbid checking email after hours. There's a slow cultural awakening: we're finally admitting that life without constant feedback is still worth living. The Real Cost of Free Here's what the attention economy has taught us: nothing is actually free. If you're not paying for the product, you are the product. Your time, your focus, your emotional state all get harvested and sold. Meta's second quarter of 2025 brought in $47.52 billion in revenue, up 22% from the previous year. They now have 3.43 billion people using their apps daily. That's almost half the world's population running through one advertising machine. Instagram brings in more money per user than any other social platform. TikTok comes in third at $109 per user, but the gap is shrinking fast. These aren't abstract numbers. They represent what advertisers are willing to pay to capture your attention for a few seconds. The bigger question is whether we can design systems that serve us instead of exploiting us. Cal Newport coined the term "digital minimalism" for this approach. People are using tools like StayFocusd or Freedom to block sites during work. Some schedule strict unplugged time each day. The specific tactics matter less than the underlying recognition: these systems were designed to exploit us, and resisting them requires deliberate effort. What Comes Next In January 2025, Meta announced plans to spend $60-65 billion on AI data centers in 2025, up from $39.2 billion in 2024. Zuckerberg called it "a defining year for AI." They're building a 2-gigawatt data center "so large it would cover a significant part of Manhattan." This isn't infrastructure for connecting people. It's infrastructure for more sophisticated manipulation. The algorithms will get better at predicting what you'll click. The ads will get better at bypassing your defenses. The interfaces will get better at eliminating friction between you and endless scrolling. Unless we demand better. That means giving users real choices (like longer autoplay timers that actually require conscious decisions). It means enforcing breaks by default, not just offering them as hidden settings. It means remembering that the best attention profit is attention freely given, not attention stolen through dark patterns and dopamine manipulation. We walked into the attention auction without knowing we were up for sale. But awareness, better tools, and some good old self-control can turn us back into customers instead of product. The platforms won't fix themselves. Their entire business model requires us to stay hooked. But there's a tipping point coming. When enough teenagers can't concentrate in class, when enough adults realize they've lost entire evenings to feeds designed to trap them, the backlash will be impossible to ignore. I still catch myself reaching for my phone out of boredom. The conditioning runs deep. But now, at least, I know what I'm reaching for: a carefully engineered dopamine dispenser designed to monetize my consciousness. We may not win every swipe, but at least now I know it's a battle.

Netflix

The Attention Economy Has Turned us Into Inventory

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

The Future of Photography in a World Filled With AI

The Noonification: Use This 7-Step McKinsey Framework to Solve Any Problem (1/10/2023)

The Noonification: A Taxonomy of Inclusiveness (1/11/2024)

The Noonification: What is the InfiniteNature-Zero AI Model? (11/19/2022)

10 Ways AI Has Changed Our Lives

100 Days of AI, Day 8: Experimenting With Microsoft's Semantic Kernel Using GPT-4

The Future of Photography in a World Filled With AI

The Noonification: Use This 7-Step McKinsey Framework to Solve Any Problem (1/10/2023)

The Noonification: A Taxonomy of Inclusiveness (1/11/2024)

The Noonification: What is the InfiniteNature-Zero AI Model? (11/19/2022)

10 Ways AI Has Changed Our Lives

100 Days of AI, Day 8: Experimenting With Microsoft's Semantic Kernel Using GPT-4

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Minty

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps