The article demonstrates the use of ConfigureAwait(false) efficiently to add deadlock-free asynchronous code.
Consider an example where the user wants to load data asynchronously within a method.
/// <summary>
/// Old approach with classic async await
/// </summary>
/// <returns></returns>
public async static Task OldApproach()
{
await ReadDataAsync();
}
In this approach, the await operator waits for ReadDataAsync and then proceeds with execution in the same synchronization context from where it began.
The aforementioned approach is used when the developer ensures that UI updates are executed in a separate thread. However, it may introduce potential deadlock risks.
Let’s transform the above method using ConfigureAwait(false)
/// <summary>
/// Optimized approach with ConfigureAwait
/// </summary>
/// <returns></returns>
public static async Task OptimizedApproachAsync()
{
await ReadDataAsync().ConfigureAwait(false);
}
By adding this, the compiler doesn't add the execution in the same synchronization context, which reduces the chances of deadlocks.
The aforementioned optimization is beneficial in non-UI applications like library code, etc.
Please find below the benefits of using ConfigureAwait(false) method
As the optimized approach doesn’t add the execution to the same synchronization context, it saves on extra overhead and helps create scalable applications.
ConfigureAwait(false) method mitigates the risk of deadlocks when the synchronization context is blocked.
The ConfigureAwait(false) method in C# aims to craft efficient, deadlock-avoidant asynchronous code. Its advantages are particularly beneficial in non-UI applications and in library projects.
GitHub — ssukhpinder/30DayChallenge.Net
Thank you for being a part of the C# community! Before you leave:
Follow us: X | LinkedIn | Dev.to | Hashnode | Newsletter | Tumblr
Visit our other platforms: GitHub | Instagram | Tiktok | Quora | Daily.dev
More content at C# Programming
Also published here.